---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6199/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Patch deletes old
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6200/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Fix typo
Agent would fail
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 06:23:44AM -0400, Koushik Das wrote:
Currently in CS only root volume can be created on local storage.
This feature is to support creation of data volumes on local
storage. Please refer to [1] for the details. There is already a bug
CS-14277 created for this.
Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is a
global setting (use.local.storage).
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:13 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6199/#review9588
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kishan Kavala
On July 30, 2012, 6:16 a.m.,
By the way, we might want to add the same configuration to vmops for XenServer.
Currently it is possible to have a tenant vm send a router advertisement on the
isolated lan that is picked up by XenServer. Even though XenServer only has a
bridge interface in the tenant lan that interface will be
Hi Edison,
Thanks for your sharing. Could you help to write up a wiki page about
multiple devcloud setup?
Yes, wrote a page here:
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/DIY+DevCloud+Setup
Though the proof of concept setup works (with a lot of system crashes) and the
idea of multiple
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is
a global setting (use.local.storage).
-Koushik
Even zone-level seems too high - why isn't this at the cluster level?
--David
Edison,
I'm working on converting the second phase of the devcloudsetup.sh
script to puppet, but I ran into this issue.
Looking for help understanding what you were doing here:
In this section of the script:
107 echo configure xcp
108 wget $fileSvr/echo -P /usr/lib/xcp/plugins/
109
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hey guys,
The current systemvm has IPv6 enabled including autoconfiguration. This means
that if the machine is placed in an IPv6 enabled network (or somebody starts
sending router advertisements) the VM's
Hey Chip,
Yeah, I want help :-)
I just committed the sysctl.conf changes for the systemvm. This morning i
applied them to my test environment and they do the job.
We could add the actual sysctl command to the vmops next to adding the IPv6
ip6tables statements I think.
Cheers,
Hugo
David,
We are final phase of deciding which license to follow - MIT or BSD. I think
once the decision is taken we should make the jars available from an URL
Thanks,
Ram
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: 29 July 2012 03:10
To:
Hey David,
This the part from the SLA regarding distribution of the netapp SDK:
-- snip --
No distribution or redistribution rights are granted by this license, except as
specified in this paragraph. Notwithstanding the terms of this Agreement to
the contrary, certain of the components of the
Hey Chip,
Interesting, which version are you using?
My box:
Linux XX 2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs6.0.2.542.170665xen #1 SMP Tue Jan 17 15:14:24
EST 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@X ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
XenServer release 6.0.2-53456p (xenenterprise)
[root@X ~]# ls
Looks like we are using the same version, but different configuration?:
# uname -a
Linux xshost2 2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs6.0.2.542.170665xen #1 SMP Tue Jan 17
15:14:24 EST 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
# cat /etc/redhat-release
XenServer release 6.0.2-53456p (xenenterprise)
# ls
Indeed - I'm testing in an advanced networking zone, so we didn't
bother doing the support pack installation. That would be the
difference.
I think your scripts will work, excluding the error condition that my
environment introduces. IMO - if that pack isn't required, then we
should expect to
Hey,
I just pushed a fix that will disable IPv6 immediately and reinstate the
disable-ipv6 file. This should take care of the current situation for people
with the support pack. So far my testing has revealed no adverse effects.
Anybody any idea why IPv6 support is enabled by the cloud
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hey,
I just pushed a fix that will disable IPv6 immediately and reinstate the
disable-ipv6 file. This should take care of the current situation for people
with the support pack. So far my testing has
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 5:12 AM
To: Edison Su
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Development with multiple devclouds
Hi Edison,
Thanks for your sharing. Could you help to write up a wiki page about
multiple devcloud
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 6:02 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Update on wrapping DevCloud into a Vagrant Box
Edison,
I'm working on converting the second phase of the
On 7/29/12 9:31 PM, Tommy Aditya Lawanto to...@wowrack.com wrote:
I'm getting this error when i try to get password from a vm using
password-enabled template (through API) :
[error] = No password for VM with id '70' found.
I've tried resetting the password using management server, and it
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:04 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently
it is a
This is definitely a good suggestion. If the community feels that having the
setting at the cluster level makes more sense then I will take that into
account.
Thanks,
Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 6:33 PM
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5742/#review9600
---
Jayapal: Can you close this request as 'submitted'?
- John Kinsella
David,
I am following it up. Should have the details in a day or two. So what's the
requirement - making the jars available at a publically accessible URL with
license text around it should suffice?
Thanks,
Ram
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: 30
Guys and gals - if you have a request in ReviewBoard that's been marked Ship
It! - it might not be obvious, but you need to go back and close the request
by marking it Submitted.
Please remember to do this after momentarily basking in the joy of having your
patch accepted. :)
That'll save us
I see mentions of branding in a few build.xml files, particularly under plugins…
On Jul 30, 2012, at 7:12 AM, David Nalley wrote:
Hi folks, please take a look at:
build/deploy/branding/
I am guessing we need to purge all of those - and given that the
'default' contains a VMOps logo I am
-Original Message-
From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:01 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Please remember to close review board requests
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella
Hi...
I was talking to David Nalley over IRC and we spotted two main tasks
that we should put our focus on in the coming 1-2 months and
more preferably the coming month:
1- Finishing the INFRA related tasks (namely JIRA)
2- Getting our first release out
With these tasks done, provided that
KVM code is moved to plugins/hypervisor/kvm, a new jar, cloud-kvm.jar is
created for all the java classes used by kvm code.
-Original Message-
From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:00 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: KVM
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is
a global setting (use.local.storage).
-Koushik
Even zone-level seems too high - why isn't this at the cluster level?
--David
+1 . It
Hi Edison,
You may already know this but, now compile-server is broken:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Edisocompile-server:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/home/tomoe/code/incubator-cloudstack/target/classes/cloud-server.jar
[echo] Compiling /home/tomoe/code/incubator-cloudstack/server/src
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:30 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please remember to close review board requests
[Snip]
The patch submitter has to mark the issue as closed - as a committer I
Thanks, now working fine.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Sorry, forget to check in some files.
Checkout out the latest master, will be fixed.
-Original Message-
From: to...@midokura.jp [mailto:to...@midokura.jp] On Behalf Of Tomoe
Sugihara
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mike McClurg mike.mccl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:12 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
I just looked at xenserverjava (the version shipped today 5.6.100-1,
and 6.0.0-1)
However, while there is a copy of ASLv2 in the source, it does so
It would be great if we could look at creating a system (even just a utility
script) that would allow us to re-attach a secondary storage server and
salvage existing templates housed on it.
I'm thinking it could crawl the template tree and prompt the user for a new
z/p/c to attach the
Folks:
I took a first swing at this. Please do proof it and either add
additional content, or suggest it here.
This is due on Wednesday, so please don't procrastinate.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2012
--David
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
After my draft release plan last week, I've taken the feedback that I got
(thanks for that, everyone) and I think we're ready to commit to this plan now.
The timescales are very tight, but that's the aim - get something out as soon
as we can, to make our first release as an
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
On 7/25/12 10:52 PM, Ishimoto, Ryu r...@midokura.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Also note that in order to support hotplug and hot-detach of
Hi folks,
I know I keep beating this drum until it sounds absurd, but I
discovered this blog post [1] today which reinforces to me that vijava
might be a suitable alternative for the VMware SDK, and as a bonus
gets rid of the proprietary licensing that the VMware SDK brings along
with it.
David,
I can vouch for vi java. It's a much more rational API for VMware
integration than the native SDK, and we can always ask the author
(Steve Jin) for support if we need it. He's a great guy, and really
does a good job with that project. We use the library here at SunGard
almost
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6193/
---
(Updated July 31, 2012, 4:12 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6222/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Adding Apache license
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6222/
---
(Updated July 31, 2012, 4:16 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
Hi,
I tried to import and use two devclouds, but for some reason I was not
able to add the first host itself. Please help debug, if at all this
idea seems worth exploring. Also, as Chiradeep suggested in an email
previously, would n't be a good option to have a single XenServer/NFS
as
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried to import and use two devclouds, but for some reason I was not
able to add the first host itself. Please help debug, if at all this
idea seems worth exploring. Also, as Chiradeep
46 matches
Mail list logo
