Re: Access to builds.apache.org

2012-12-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/12/3 Prasanna Santhanam prasanna.santha...@citrix.com: Hi Olivier, Could you provide me with access as well, as I need to move a couple of jobs from jenkins.c.o to builds.a.o? what is your apache id ? Thanks, On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 06:24:32AM -0500, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, Done.

API refactoring work for 4.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi everyone, The API refactoring work for 4.1.0 is going on in api_refactoring branch: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/api_refactoring So far I've broken the user level APIs (build system is broken on the branch), admin level API is

RE: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-04 Thread Sailaja Mada
Hi, I tried to use Ubutnu build available @ http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-4.0.1-nonoss-ubuntu/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/CloudStack-non-OSS-4.0.1-1.tar.bz2 . Cloudstack packages are built with 4.0.0 version name. These has to be named with 4.0.1 to do upgrade from 4.0 to 4.0.1.

Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion

2012-12-04 Thread Devdeep Singh
Hi, With XenServer 6.1, support for storage xenmotion has been added in XenServer. I am planning to work on enabling support for XenServer 6.1 and storage xenmotion in CloudStack. It'll involve the following activities: 1. Enable support in CloudStack for XenServer 6.1. There is already a bug

Re: Review Request: cs-bugtool implementation, new troubleshooting tool dedicated for collecting CS logs and basic system information

2012-12-04 Thread Radoslaw Smigielski
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8248/ --- (Updated Dec. 4, 2012, 11:50 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes

RE: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion

2012-12-04 Thread Sailaja Mada
Hi Devdeep, This is regarding XenMotion, I have noticed few known issues specified in the given link such as : 1. When migrating VMs using Storage XenMotion, attempts to cancel the operation may not delete the temporary virtual disks. [CA-87710] [CA-87689] 2. When a VM is unexpectedly shut

[Discuss] Style Guide for Apache CloudStack Documentation ?

2012-12-04 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
Hello Community, Any thoughts on the need of a style guide for the CloudStack Documentation ? First of all, do we need one-If yes, do we need to create afresh , or follow the existing style guides within Apache projects, such as Maven. Here is the link:

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-580) Packages are named with 4.0 with 4.0.1 build

2012-12-04 Thread Sailaja Mada (JIRA)
Sailaja Mada created CLOUDSTACK-580: --- Summary: Packages are named with 4.0 with 4.0.1 build Key: CLOUDSTACK-580 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-580 Project: CloudStack

RE: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-04 Thread Sailaja Mada
Hi Sudha, I have created the issue @ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-580 Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:47 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [ASF

Re: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion

2012-12-04 Thread David Nalley
2. Update the java bindings that are used by CloudStack for making xapi calls. The current bindings are present under deps/XenServerJava in source tree. They need to be updated for getting the new apis that have been added for supporting storage xenmotion. CloudStack has made customizations

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread David Nalley
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Duncan Johnston Watt duncan.johnstonw...@cloudsoftcorp.com wrote: Chip/All Just to add to this feature request provided we have the support/backing of the community we would be happy to lead this effort/commit resources to this as it is well aligned with our

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread David Nalley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509836#comment-13509836 ] David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: - On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:02 PM,

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-581) Unable to create VM Instance after being able to creating small number of VMs.

2012-12-04 Thread Adam Kamali (JIRA)
Adam Kamali created CLOUDSTACK-581: -- Summary: Unable to create VM Instance after being able to creating small number of VMs. Key: CLOUDSTACK-581 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-581

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Alex Huang
This is an exception returned by the xapi layer in XenServer. You can track it down further by looking at the xenserver logs on the hypervisor the vm tried to start on. There's a log on /var/log/xensource.log. Look through there and see what it doesn't like about the parameter it's trying to

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Alex Heneveld
Hi folks-- To get the ball rolling here are a few questions on design/features. And my answers, in order to kick off the argument discussion this needs! I'll collate and post at #576. *(1) Should we try for an AWS or vApp look-alike? Or build something around Cloudstack concepts?*

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
Alex, There is no /var/log/xensource.log file on the XCP machine running in VirtualBox (= Devcloud2) but those one : ls -la /var/log -rw--- 1 root root20206 Dec 4 16:58 xcp-networkd.log -rw--- 1 root root 113299 Dec 4 17:04 xcp-squeezed.log -rw--- 1 root

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Ram Ganesh
Google'ing around the exception took me to this link - http://old-list-archives.xen.org/archives/html/xen-api/2009-11/msg00123.html -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: 04 December 2012 22:32 To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE:

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread John Burwell
Alex, You may also want to take a look at OpenShift (https://github.com/openshift). Rather than VMs, they separate applications using SELinux controls which leads to far greater densities. This approach has allowed them to support a number of unique features (such as SSH access for each

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread John Burwell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509873#comment-13509873 ] John Burwell commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: - Alex, You may also want to take a

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Alex Heneveld
John, +1 thanks for the idea. I'm a big fan of OpenShift. I think that should definitely be a supported deployment tech. We've done similar (lightweight isolation) with LXC at one of our customers. So the question is whether things like this should be a native option? Or do we aim to

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Alex Heneveld (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509883#comment-13509883 ] Alex Heneveld commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: -- John, +1 thanks for the idea.

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread John Burwell
Alex, My thought is a PaaS would be implemented in a manner akin to BareMetal whereby an SPI would be provided to direct the allocation of resources (compute, storage, and network) to one or more PaaS instances. CloudStack would provide a common authentication and authorization layer allowing

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread John Burwell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509892#comment-13509892 ] John Burwell commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: - Alex, My thought is a PaaS would

Re: Review Request: cs-bugtool implementation, new troubleshooting tool dedicated for collecting CS logs and basic system information

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8248/#review14022 --- Looks better now, please add Prasanna (tsp) and myself on the

Re: Access to builds.apache.org

2012-12-04 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:12:39PM +0530, Olivier Lamy wrote: 2012/12/3 Prasanna Santhanam prasanna.santha...@citrix.com: Hi Olivier, Could you provide me with access as well, as I need to move a couple of jobs from jenkins.c.o to builds.a.o? what is your apache id ? t...@apache.org --

Re: New PPMC Member: Chiradeep Vittal

2012-12-04 Thread Kelven Yang
Congratulations Chiradeep! Kelven

Re: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-04 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:47:24PM +0530, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: Sailaja Log defect and mark it as blocker for 4.0.1 release if this is not done yet. Sure I'll fix the binary - but these are just convenience binaries and not the source release itself. So I wouldn't see it as a release

RE: Static Analysis Tools

2012-12-04 Thread Demetrius Tsitrelis
At the conference you showed a URL with the results. Is that publicly available? -Original Message- From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:53 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Static Analysis Tools Allow me to clarify

Re: API refactoring work for 4.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
There should be a facility to locate the API under a specific namespace. E.g., compute: server:8080/compute/ loadbalancer: server:8080/lb/ volume: server:8080/volume/ On 12/4/12 2:19 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@citrix.com wrote: Hi everyone, The API refactoring work for 4.1.0 is going on in

RE: [Discuss] Style Guide for Apache CloudStack Documentation ?

2012-12-04 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Radhika The Struts style guide has more details http://struts.apache.org/2.2.3/docs/documentation-style-guide.html and we can borrow some tips from there. One other thing I think will help users is quick link to Single Page Html. This is useful because people often want to search for a

Re: Marketing and a who uses it list

2012-12-04 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
+1 from me. Crosspost to 'users' list perhaps? On 12/3/12 11:41 PM, Robyn Bergeron robyn.berge...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings. A quick bit of background, esp. as I'm effectively a long time reader, first time poster - I attended the collaboration conference over the past weekend, became

Re: Review Request: cs-bugtool implementation, new troubleshooting tool dedicated for collecting CS logs and basic system information

2012-12-04 Thread Radoslaw Smigielski
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8248/ --- (Updated Dec. 4, 2012, 6:49 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna

Re: Router VM peaks at ~920 Mbit/s instad of 4000 Mbit/s network offering rate limit

2012-12-04 Thread Bryan Whitehead
What is network.throttling.rate and vm.network.throttling.rate set to in global settings? Please correct me if I'm wrong about how these global settings work, but I think these values override the templates. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Wolfram Schlich li...@wolfram.schlich.orgwrote: Hi!

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-582) Cannot perform password reset for Windows instances on VMWare

2012-12-04 Thread Bill Rich (JIRA)
Bill Rich created CLOUDSTACK-582: Summary: Cannot perform password reset for Windows instances on VMWare Key: CLOUDSTACK-582 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-582 Project:

Re: Marketing and a who uses it list

2012-12-04 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:11:51PM +0530, Robyn Bergeron wrote: Greetings. A quick bit of background, esp. as I'm effectively a long time reader, first time poster - I attended the collaboration conference over the past weekend, became involved in a discussion about ways to market an open

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-583) Expose Service Offerings and Zone options (including UUID) to users in the CloudStack UI

2012-12-04 Thread Jie Feng (JIRA)
Jie Feng created CLOUDSTACK-583: --- Summary: Expose Service Offerings and Zone options (including UUID) to users in the CloudStack UI Key: CLOUDSTACK-583 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-583

Re: API refactoring work for 4.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread David Nalley
Please go through the api fs proposal. Suggestions, proposals, feedback, flames? Sorry for not going through this earlier. The unit tests and testing in general concern me. So let me ask - what is the plan to test that the refactored API behaves the same as the current API? --David

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-583) Expose Service Offerings and Zone options (including UUID) to users in the CloudStack UI

2012-12-04 Thread Sonny Chhen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sonny Chhen reassigned CLOUDSTACK-583: -- Assignee: Brian Federle Expose Service Offerings and Zone options (including

cloud-setup-databases: How to run script when building in dev environment

2012-12-04 Thread Navina Ramesh
Hi, I had built cloudstack4.0 from source and had setup the database. Due to some problems with MySQL server, I had to drop all the cloudstack related databases. How do I restore them to initial setup? I tried running ~/incubator-cloudstack/setup/bindir/cloud-setup-databases.in from command

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-583) Expose Service Offerings and Zone options (including UUID) to users in the CloudStack UI

2012-12-04 Thread Jie Feng (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13509978#comment-13509978 ] Jie Feng commented on CLOUDSTACK-583: - Forgot to mention that service offering is

[DISCUSS] changing the format of commit message subject lines

2012-12-04 Thread David Nalley
Hi folks, I'd like to propose that we change the commit message subject line from: git commit: $short_commit_msg to: git commit: $branch - $short_commit_msg Any other opinions? --David

RE: [DISCUSS] changing the format of commit message subject lines

2012-12-04 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Yes prefixing with branch makes it easier to process the message -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 12:36 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] changing the format of commit message subject lines Hi

RE: cloud-setup-databases: How to run script when building in dev environment

2012-12-04 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Use mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb -Original Message- From: Navina Ramesh [mailto:rnav...@acis.ufl.edu] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 12:02 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Subject: cloud-setup-databases: How to run

RE: Review Request: Utility for generating the .tx/config file

2012-12-04 Thread Kelcey Damage (BBITS)
If we don't need length control, then it would become a non-issue. If only 5 are over 50 CHAR, then maybe we could change those 5 by hand. And institute a 50 CHAR max. This would make things more readable then clipping and suffixing. Let me know how you guys want to approach this. On the other

Re: Review Request: cs-bugtool implementation, new troubleshooting tool dedicated for collecting CS logs and basic system information

2012-12-04 Thread Radoslaw Smigielski
On Dec. 4, 2012, 7:29 p.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: I like the idea that this script can be provided as a convenience to collect various logs. One problem however is that the script assumes root access on the management server and executes a bunch of commands (ip routes, hostnames,

Re: API refactoring work for 4.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread Andrew Bayer
Seems to me that coming up with a general API validation test suite (using jclouds, Marvin, whatever) that verifies consistency of behavior across API versions would be a very handy thing to have. A. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Please go through the

Re: API refactoring work for 4.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Yes, there will if we finish this work, but not within CS mgmt server itself. CloudStack api server should not become a load balance or a web server, it would be a servlet running in any container like jetty, tomcat or jboss. Such endpoints can be configured to proxy traffic to multiple api

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
Any idea on how to upgrade xen on Devcloud (= VB running Devian Wheezy + Xen 4.1) ? On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote: Ah...Didn't realize you're using devCloud. Anthony is right in another email. This is most likely due to a mismatch between the xapi

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-584) typos in Apache_CloudStack-4.0.0-incubating-CloudStack_Nicira_NVP_Guide-en-US

2012-12-04 Thread Tian Siyuan (JIRA)
Tian Siyuan created CLOUDSTACK-584: -- Summary: typos in Apache_CloudStack-4.0.0-incubating-CloudStack_Nicira_NVP_Guide-en-US Key: CLOUDSTACK-584 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-584

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-584) typos in Apache_CloudStack-4.0.0-incubating-CloudStack_Nicira_NVP_Guide-en-US

2012-12-04 Thread Tian Siyuan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tian Siyuan updated CLOUDSTACK-584: --- Attachment: 0001-Correct-some-typo-in-the-.xml-files-included-in.patch patch attached.

Re: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-04 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 12:00:42AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:47:24PM +0530, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: Sailaja Log defect and mark it as blocker for 4.0.1 release if this is not done yet. Sure I'll fix the binary - but these are just convenience

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Rajesh Battala (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510229#comment-13510229 ] Rajesh Battala commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: --- Is this similar to vApps

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Duncan Johnston Watt
Kelcey The reason we presented this as PaaS enablement is that we see this as a distinct but related activity. One that is important to end users/consumers of cloud. Best Duncan On 4 December 2012 09:58, Kelceydamage@bbits kel...@bbits.ca wrote: I am in agreement with this, as a content IaaS

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Duncan Johnston-Watt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510243#comment-13510243 ] Duncan Johnston-Watt commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: - Kelcey The reason

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510257#comment-13510257 ] Kelceydamage@bbits commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: --- Sorry, don't get me

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-553) SRX - When adding SRX device make Public Network - default to untrusted and Private Network - default to trusted as un-editable fields.

2012-12-04 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-553: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.1) 4.1.0 SRX - When adding

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Kelcey Damage (BBITS)
I also failed to properly read your original mailer where you state vApp and VMware style feature. I currently have a vCloud and yes those are very useful features. -kd -Original Message- From: Kelceydamage@bbits (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:23

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13510265#comment-13510265 ] Kelceydamage@bbits commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: --- I also failed to

Re: [Discuss] Style Guide for Apache CloudStack Documentation ?

2012-12-04 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:41:06PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: Hello Community, Any thoughts on the need of a style guide for the CloudStack Documentation ? Any project of sufficient size probably needs at least a rudimentary style guide. First of all, do we need one-If yes, do we

Re: [DISCUSS] changing the format of commit message subject lines

2012-12-04 Thread prasanna
On 5 December 2012 02:05, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to propose that we change the commit message subject line from: git commit: $short_commit_msg to: git commit: $branch - $short_commit_msg Any other opinions? Not against the idea but how would this be used?

RE: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion

2012-12-04 Thread Devdeep Singh
-Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:44 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion 2. Update the java bindings that are used by CloudStack for making

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
Hi Edison, Anthony, Rohit, The new DevCloud2 image (http://rohityadav.in/logs/devcloud/) runs on Debian - Wheezy ( http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/devcloud/devcloud2.ova) and not anymore like DevCloud1 (http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/DevCloud) on Ubuntu

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Charles, I'm not sure why you want to do that? I think I may have a way to get it work with Ubuntu, just that it failed for a number of reasons and worked perfectly with Wheezy. My view is that Debian has higher a security and test standards for their releases. (note: systemvms are also made

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
Hi Rohit, I don't want to do something else but I have issues (MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy: ..) when I try to create a new instance in the management server of CloudStack using CentOs instead of by default linux kernel proposed. I run the project like Sebastien (

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Charles, alright you can try to create a light weight linux template using damn small linux, gentoo or a configurable archlinux as an instance using an ISO. If you want to really use CentOS, you should increase the RAM and maybe attach an additional disk via vbox, you may also try a KVM setup

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
The reason why I have tried to deploy CentOS is that I'm not sure that with the small linux image that we provide(cloudstack) I can deploy my Apache karaf runtime (fabric project) which requires JDK 6 and at least 500Mb of RAM. On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@citrix.com

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Are you serious, you want to run a prod. level env. setup (karaf on the vm with 500MB RAM) on a vm running on a 2G RAM (does not help even if you increase ram or disk) devcloud running on virtualbox/kvm? Get a real host maybe? DevCloud is limited and a good alternative for (offline or

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
The VirtualBox on my machine has 4GB and I try to use Cloudstack to finalize tests to deploy karaf runtime in the cloud ( http://fuse.fusesource.org/fabric/docs/fabric-cloud-containers.html). Tests already succeeded with OpenStack Essex on my MacBook pro using a comparable config. So I don't