Heya,
Took the liberty of copying the proposal into email as this makes discussion
much easier. Comment inline like a regular email.
IPv6 Support
1 Background
CloudStack does not support IPv6 today. Users/Customers are starting to ask
for IPv6 support in CloudStack. With some users
Hi,
I think the current work flow for development (non-committer) fits well for
small patch development.
But in case of feature development or bigger patches which might need longer
period of development, developer need some place to push the code changes. It's
needed to push code changes to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-456:
-
Assignee: David Nalley
License tag in SPEC isn't what RPM is expecting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-637:
-
Assignee: Vijay Venkatachalam
AutoScale
-
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-453:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
KVM plugin used in the management server - is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-453:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
KVM plugin used in the management server -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-122:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
CLONE - OVS support in KVM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-122:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0)
(was: 4.0.0)
Ilia Shakitko created CLOUDSTACK-721:
Summary: User statictics is empty when instance haven't public IP
Key: CLOUDSTACK-721
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-721
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ilia Shakitko updated CLOUDSTACK-721:
-
Description:
The usage server can give the system usage of each virtual machine
Hi all,
We've had some good discussions on the proposed bylaws over the last
couple of weeks [1], so I'd like to move this forward to a VOTE now.
Of course, if there are still concerns or discussion points that
people want to see addressed, we can stop the vote to discuss and edit
as necessary.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ilia Shakitko updated CLOUDSTACK-721:
-
Description:
The usage server can give the system usage of each virtual machine
On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com wrote:
Hello All,
I wish to propose syslog enhancements in CloudStack - I have added some
details
herehttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/syslog+enhancements
along with a JIRA ticket 772
The correct
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com wrote:
Hello All,
I wish to propose a better VM sync in CloudStack - I have added some details
herehttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VMWare+Enhancements+-+Support+for+DRS+and+VM+HA
along with a JIRA
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com wrote:
Hello All,
I wish to propose a better VM sync in CloudStack - I have added some details
herehttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Configurable+setting+to+use+linked+clones+or+not+on+VMware
along
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 January 2013, 10:00:00 PST. The
report
for your podling
Sorry for the late reminder - I'm only just coming back online after the
holiday. Regularly scheduled meeting is at 17:00 UTC today in
#cloudstack-meeting on Freenode.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
http://dissociatedpress.net/
Twitter: @jzb
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com wrote:
Hello All,
I wish to propose a better VM sync in CloudStack - I have added some details
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Marvin no-re...@apache.org wrote:
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I think the current work flow for development (non-committer) fits well for
small patch development.
But in case of feature development or bigger patches which might need longer
period of
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com wrote:
Hello All,
I wish to propose a better VM sync in CloudStack - I have
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I think the current work flow for development (non-committer) fits well for
small patch development.
But in case of feature development or bigger patches which might need longer
period of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13542229#comment-13542229
]
Ilia Shakitko commented on CLOUDSTACK-721:
--
Here is a suggestion of my
I'll grab this. Any way we can get this tuned to send a note a few days
before the deadline in the future?
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 04:20:17PM +, Marvin wrote:
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
I'll grab this. Any way we can get this tuned to send a note a few days
before the deadline in the future?
I am sure patches would be welcome - we've discussed this before on
general@i.a.o (or Noah has more specifically)
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hey Vijay,
Great news!
Comments inline.
-Original Message-
From: Vijay Venkatachalam
Vijay,
I filed this bug for making netscaler plugin part of oss release. Can you take
it over for 4.1?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-716
Thanks.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Sunday, December
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-716:
-
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Make netscaler plugin part of apache release
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: 02 January 2013 21:32
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Syslog enhancements
On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hello All,
I
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Ram Ganesh ram.gan...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: 02 January 2013 21:32
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Syslog enhancements
On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:12
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: 02 January 2013 23:33
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Syslog enhancements
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Ram Ganesh ram.gan...@citrix.com
wrote:
-Original
-Original Message-
From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:49 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Discuss] SNMP Alerts support in CloudStack
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sonny Chhen reassigned CLOUDSTACK-720:
--
Assignee: Pranav Saxena
Fail to load a png image when accessing the web
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Ram Ganesh ram.gan...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: 02 January 2013 23:33
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Syslog enhancements
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at
I think the problem is Ram is not on the roles.
Ram,
I added you. Try again.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:11 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Syslog enhancements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-720:
-
Affects Version/s: 4.0.0
Fail to load a png image when accessing the web
Hari,
I echo John's question here. I don't see any requirements on the wiki that
require more than a syslog appender for log4j. What this means is that
whatever is logged to our current log file will get sent to syslog. That's
something someone can configure today on existing releases. Do
Here's some references for people who don't know log4j and syslog well.
http://loggly.com/support/sending-data/logging-from/application-logs/java/
Maybe all we need is someone to add this information to our wiki or maybe this
is only a docs improvement?
--Alex
-Original Message-
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote:
Chip,
I have fixed the issue and testing is in progress now.
Just checking in. I don't see any reviews pending or updates to this
bug. How's it going?
This bug fix is large enough (IMO) to impact
OK, I understand - but this still requires various sized compute service
offerings created by the admin - when I read that statement the first time, it
appeared as if that was not required, hence my question..
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Sanjay Tripathi
Sateesh,
Can you help us out by breaking the bug into two subtasks?
- The work that's needed in the CloudStack core. That would be changes to the
cloud-core and cloud-server.
- The work that's needed in the plugins.
I think by doing this it will give a clearer picture of how big an affect
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
Hey Murali,
Great to hear about where you stand right now. Is the code (work in
progress obviously) available on one of the branches? I'd love to
take a look at it.
-chip
Chip
I have been using
Is there a link to the jar file?
-Original Message-
From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 10:27 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: NetScaler lib/sdk jars are apache licensed
Chip, etal,
Chip Childers created CLOUDSTACK-722:
Summary: Using a certificate chain for the Console Proxy is not
documented
Key: CLOUDSTACK-722
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-722
Hi Chip,
I wish to see this for 4.1 - I'm hoping Kelven will take this feature over..
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 8:04 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Kelven Yang
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hari Kannan updated CLOUDSTACK-718:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
VMs on hardware dedicated to a specific account
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hari Kannan updated CLOUDSTACK-712:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
syslog enhancements
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hari Kannan updated CLOUDSTACK-714:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
S3-based secondary Storage
--
+1
-sebastien
On Jan 2, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi all,
We've had some good discussions on the proposed bylaws over the last
couple of weeks [1], so I'd like to move this forward to a VOTE now.
Of course, if there are still concerns or discussion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hari Kannan updated CLOUDSTACK-711:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
CPU and Memory OverCommit
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hari Kannan updated CLOUDSTACK-672:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Raise cluster size limit to 16 on VMware
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hari Kannan updated CLOUDSTACK-671:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Volume snapshot enhancements for VMware
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hari Kannan updated CLOUDSTACK-669:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Better VM Sync
--
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hari Kannan updated CLOUDSTACK-670:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Configurable setting to use linked clones or not on VMware
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah updated CLOUDSTACK-704:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Dedicated Resources - Public IP Addresses and VLANs per Tenant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah updated CLOUDSTACK-706:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Persistent Networks without running a VM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah updated CLOUDSTACK-705:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
IP Address reservation within a network
Hi all,
This is Kanzhe Jiang from BigSwitch.
I am working on a cloudstack networking plugin to integrate with BigSwitch
controller to provide network isolation in advanced zone.
Should I file a bug report or a feature request on the mailing list to
start the process?
Thanks,
--
Kanzhe Jiang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah updated CLOUDSTACK-702:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Multiple IP Ranges
--
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah updated CLOUDSTACK-701:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Support non-contiguous VLAN ranges
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah updated CLOUDSTACK-700:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Load Balancing using External Provider for Shared Networks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah updated CLOUDSTACK-621:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
nTier Apps 2.0 Features
---
+1
On Jan 2, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi all,
We've had some good discussions on the proposed bylaws over the last
couple of weeks [1], so I'd like to move this forward to a VOTE now.
Of course, if there are still concerns or discussion points that
Hey all - we're supposed to put this up today. Sorry for the short
notice, the Marvin reminder just came in today. Comments/suggestions,
etc., welcome.
CloudStack
CloudStack is an IaaS (“Infrastracture as a Service”) cloud
orchestration
platform.
CloudStack has been in incubation since
The project has continuted to grow and has added several new PPMC
members and committers since October:
- Edison Su, Alex Huang, Hugo Trippaers, and Chiradeep Vittal,
have joined the PPMC since October.
- Rohit Yadav, Marcus Sorensen, Gavin Lee, Sudha Ponnaganti,
and Min Chen
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013, at 02:24 PM, David Nalley wrote:
The project has continuted to grow and has added several new PPMC
members and committers since October:
- Edison Su, Alex Huang, Hugo Trippaers, and Chiradeep Vittal,
have joined the PPMC since October.
- Rohit Yadav,
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Hey all - we're supposed to put this up today. Sorry for the short
notice, the Marvin reminder just came in today. Comments/suggestions,
etc., welcome.
Thanks for grabbing this Joe!
CloudStack
CloudStack is an IaaS
(Apologies for sending this late, we were working on this over the Holidays and
the announcement didn't go out)
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Kelcey Damage to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that they have accepted.
Being a
Kanzhe,
Please follow this document. If at any point, you feel something's not right
with the document, please raise the issue with the list.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Adding+new+features+and+design+documents
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Kanzhe Jiang
woot!
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
(Apologies for sending this late, we were working on this over the
Holidays and the announcement didn't go out)
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Kelcey Damage to
Thanks John, and thank you everybody. I hope in 2013 I can involve myself to
a larger degree in the project.
-kd
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 12:38 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org cloudstack-
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:37 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
(Apologies for sending this late, we were working on this over the Holidays
and the announcement didn't go out)
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Kelcey Damage to become a
+1
-kd
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 12:05 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Project Bylaws
+1
On Jan 2, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Congrats Kelcey!
John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
(Apologies for sending this late, we were working on this over the Holidays and
the announcement didn't go out)
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Kelcey Damage to become a committer and we are
One quick follow up.
If we approve the bylaw draft, I'll publish it to the website.
However, the document comes from the perspective of CloudStack being a
top level project (graduated from the incubator). I'd likely include
a header note indicating this issue. My preference is to approach the
I was gonna comment, but figured that's where ya were going.
On Jan 2, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
One quick follow up.
If we approve the bylaw draft, I'll publish it to the website.
However, the document comes from the perspective of CloudStack being
I agree with David's suggestion of making it 2 way - service (compute) offering
as well as letting the user to select
Hari
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 8:54 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Kelven Yang
Good comments - keep 'em coming!
On Jan 2, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Technically this is a very sound idea, but scale needs to be discussed.
Having static assignments in a database like we do for IPv4 could have
potential impact as the address
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com wrote:
I agree with David's suggestion of making it 2 way - service (compute)
offering as well as letting the user to select
Just to be clear... I'm against letting users select a feature like
this without the operator making
Kelcey - kudos! Welcome aboard, what a great way to start 2013!
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013, at 02:37 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
(Apologies for sending this late, we were working on this over the
Holidays and the announcement didn't go out)
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache
Hi Chip,
The admin (Operator) will first have to make this an option of the service
(compute) offering if he want to provide this. Then the end-user gets to choose
if he wants it or not. This is what I understood of David's suggestion, which I
seconded - sounds OK?
Hari
-Original
Hi all,
In our continued efforts to improve our community processes, I'd like
to propose a little bit of a change in how we go about the QA process
for our releases (to take effect in the 4.1.0 release cycle).
My motivations are to increase:
1) the visibility of test engineers that have already
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Chip,
The admin (Operator) will first have to make this an option of the service
(compute) offering if he want to provide this. Then the end-user gets to
choose if he wants it or not. This is what I understood of
Hi Chip,
I am working on the areas to be tested and plan of execution as we speak - will
be publishing it shortly. I have been following all the threads posted so I
have context for areas to be tested.
If there are no objections (or volunteers), I definitely would like to take up
QA Lead
Status page updated.
On Jan 2, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013, at 02:24 PM, David Nalley wrote:
The project has continuted to grow and has added several new PPMC
members and committers since October:
- Edison Su, Alex Huang, Hugo Trippaers,
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013, at 02:36 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Hey all - we're supposed to put this up today. Sorry for the short
notice, the Marvin reminder just came in today. Comments/suggestions,
etc., welcome.
Thanks for
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti
sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Chip,
I am working on the areas to be tested and plan of execution as we speak -
will be publishing it shortly. I have been following all the threads posted
so I have context for areas to be tested.
If
Hi Chip,
As I understand, 509 backs the NFS secondary storage using a S3 compatible
Object Store. I'm proposing that CS uses any S3 ased Object Store as the main
secondary storage (I want to avoid using the word primary in this context..) -
in that sense, it is similar to the Swift use case
Congrats Kelcey!
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/comment/4/2011/12/0def8bc3143cb696f707bc53f0c034bc/340x.gif
Thanks You and Best Regards,
Sonny H. Chhen
Manager of User Interface User Experience | Citrix Systems - CloudPlatform
4988 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Chip,
As I understand, 509 backs the NFS secondary storage using a S3 compatible
Object Store. I'm proposing that CS uses any S3 ased Object Store as the
main secondary storage (I want to avoid using the word
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Sonny Chhen sonny.ch...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Kelcey!
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/comment/4/2011/12/0def8bc3143cb696f707bc53f0c034bc/340x.gif
Well played Sonny. I thought it might have been a Rickroll at first
Congratulations, Kelcey.
-min
On 1/2/13 2:00 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Kelcey!
On 02-Jan-2013, at 12:45 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT)
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
Thanks John, and thank you everybody. I hope in 2013 I can involve
myself to
a larger degree in
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Likitha Shetty
likitha.she...@citrix.com wrote:
I am not aware of any plans. Anyone looking into this ?
Thank you,
Likitha
-Original Message-
From: Manikanta Kattamuri [mailto:manikanta.kattam...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:44
Aww, I was hoping for a RickRolling!
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 2:02 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New committer: Kelcey Damage
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Sonny Chhen
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 10:29:45AM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
I'd like to propose that the Apache CloudStack Project Bylaws
(included at the bottom of this email message) be adopted by the
community.
+1 (binding)
Thanks for taking lead on this.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Manikanta Kattamuri
manikanta.kattam...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to be able to have CloudStack manage the user objects from LDAP.
The reason would, be we have a set of other service offerings for the users
of cloudstack service.
Are there any
Congrats Kelcey! Nice way to start the new year!
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 12:38 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org cloudstack-
d...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: New committer: Kelcey Damage
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT)
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
Aww, I was hoping for a RickRolling!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 2:02
Nfs as temporary staging( I call it cache storage) is not strictly required in
the new storage framework, but it's required in the current/old code.
-Original Message-
From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 1:56 PM
To:
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
