[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard Shevel closed CLOUDSTACK-973.
-
Resolution: Fixed
was fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 8:32 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557622#comment-13557622
]
Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
Marcus, thanks for patch.
It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chandan Purushothama updated CLOUDSTACK-1016:
-
Attachment: ManagementandAgentLogs.zip
Not able to deploy VM.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557640#comment-13557640
]
Mel Davis commented on CLOUDSTACK-602:
--
Perhaps that dependency should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557658#comment-13557658
]
Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-355:
-
listSnapshotPolicies is fixed by commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557662#comment-13557662
]
Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-355:
-
listTrafficTypeImplementors is based on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-723:
--
Description:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557680#comment-13557680
]
Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-355:
-
listNetworkDevice currently will not return
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sonny Chhen reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1008:
---
Assignee: Pranav Saxena
Egress tab should not be presented in the UI for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
edison su resolved CLOUDSTACK-1016.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in 189c20b6653498a8ee8c2e398c5f2e44ab4b840a on master branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
edison su closed CLOUDSTACK-995.
Resolution: Fixed
forget to cherry-pick commit 93a89b1591caea68e69cb1cea8a4f4ad8e8e0999 into
On 01/18/2013 08:09 PM, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:51 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: new storage framework update
Hi,
On 01/16/2013 02:35 AM, Edison Su wrote:
Thanks. If it is VLAN isolation, there is not any need to introduce a new
isolation type.
Also, it looks like you are using the Quantum API -- so why not call it
the QuantumNetworkElement instead -- that way it won't be BVS specific.
On 1/15/13 7:38 PM, Kanzhe Jiang kanzhe.ji...@bigswitch.com
The current way of inferring a cidr from gateway and netmask is odd. I
support the addition of a 'cidr' parameter to the createNetwork API. If it
is supplied then that should be the basis of specifying the cidr rather
than the gateway/netmask combo.
On 1/17/13 8:07 AM, Sowmya Krishnan
I think that replication of data to each region (even if it is only for
account data) is fraught with complexity and should be left to an external
service.
Can we simplify by assuming that accounts are synced somehow?
On 1/17/13 4:58 AM, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com wrote:
Manan,
Wido, point well taken. An answer to that might be to decouple the UI from
the management server. We don't use the cloudstack UI for our customers, so
we can run the management server in a safe network, and our web interface
is the only thing that is public.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Wido
BigSwitch controller supports multiple isolations and VLAN is one of them.
As the plugin evolves, more isolation methods will be added. Hence, I would
like to add a placeholder.
Sorry for the name confusion in API. They are not quantum API, but rather
BigSwitch Orchestration API. It was used to
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:26 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: new storage framework update
On 01/18/2013 08:09 PM, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wido den
It is not easy to sync/maintain the account information in several regions.
Is it possible to have a separate account service, cloudstack management
servers in multiple region can consult ?
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent:
Chiradeep, I sucked this into a development branch. I pulled master into
that and he just sent me a patch that fixes it.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chirade...@gmail.comwrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Pushed update.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Chiradeep, I sucked this into a development branch. I pulled master into
that and he just sent me a patch that fixes it.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chirade...@gmail.comwrote:
Some of our DB schema creates long foreign keys which exceed max length of
foreign key allowed by mysql. For mysql default in 6.2 that allows longer key
so we don't see the issue.
But for mysql in rhel5.x, the default mysql only allows 1000 bytes for each
foreign key, then the DB deployment
Rayees Namathponnan created CLOUDSTACK-1017:
---
Summary: Cloud-setup-databases operation failed in RHEL5
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1017
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1017
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557797#comment-13557797
]
Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
Pushed to 4.0 branch as
David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-1018:
Summary: IPtables manipulation is EL-specific and doesn't cover
Ubuntu
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1018
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1018
That is just so confusing. So if we do ENI-style in 4.2, the rules for
accessing a VM within a VPC will be the union of
* ACL accept
* ACL deny
* instance-based SG
* nic based SG
On 1/18/13 9:50 AM, Anthony Xu xuefei...@citrix.com wrote:
Thanks for comments,
It is nice to have security group in
That's why VPC support is not in this FS for 4.1
After introduce NIC based SG, instance-based SG will be removed, each NIC of
the VM will associate with the same instance-based SG through upgrade,
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557866#comment-13557866
]
Prachi Damle commented on CLOUDSTACK-1017:
--
The key-length limit is put by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557867#comment-13557867
]
Prachi Damle commented on CLOUDSTACK-1017:
--
root@vl-sjc-cloud-qa06 ~]#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prachi Damle resolved CLOUDSTACK-1017.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Cloud-setup-databases operation failed in RHEL5
But for mysql in rhel5.x, the default mysql only allows 1000 bytes for each
foreign key
This seems to be the limitation of MyISAM engine. Using InnoDB does not cause
this issue.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:21 PM
Reachable on bhais...@apache.org and asynchronous by my tmux+irssi
bhaisaab on irc
I also see this when running in bridged mode:
mtutkowski@csms-tut:/etc/init.d$ sudo ./cloud-management status
* CloudStack-specific Tomcat servlet engine is not running.
When I do a start, it doesn't return an error message, but status indicates
the servlet engine did not start.
On Fri, Jan
Actually, when I run the start command, it opens up Nautilus (this is
Ubuntu) and places me in this folder:
/home/mtutkowski/systemvm_mnt
There are no files there, however (not even hidden ones).
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I also see
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:18:30PM +0530, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Reposting with subject line VOTE.
Committers have binding votes for this decision.
Please respond with your vote:
+1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this
+enhancement to CloudStack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rayees Namathponnan closed CLOUDSTACK-1017.
---
Verified ,
Cloud-setup-databases operation failed in
On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Animesh,
So now I am confused with all those [VOTE] threads…
Are we voting on each proposed donation separately from the docs or is the
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
