[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Radhika Nair updated CLOUDSTACK-399:
Attachment: vmware-install.html
see 8.3.8. Applying Hotfixes to a VMware vSphere Host
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Radhika Nair updated CLOUDSTACK-399:
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
Document vSphere / ESXi patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Radhika Nair reassigned CLOUDSTACK-852:
---
Assignee: Radhika Nair
[DOC] Document persistent network functionality
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Radhika Nair reassigned CLOUDSTACK-850:
---
Assignee: Radhika Nair
[DOC] Document ability to use only a portion of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13564154#comment-13564154
]
sebastien goasguen commented on CLOUDSTACK-814:
---
Did not have time to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
sebastien goasguen updated CLOUDSTACK-814:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Integrate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13564157#comment-13564157
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-969:
---
Yes - I still see vlan
Hi Folks, couple info about events in Europe:
-For the french on the list, there is a meet-up Wednesday night in Grenoble:
http://www.alpesjug.org
-There is still time to register and come to a full day of exciting cloudstack
talks *this friday* in Ghent, Belgium:
Hi Everyone,
The mad race to CloudStack documentation translation has started.
Japan is leading the way with 52% of the translation complete.
China is close second with 40%
Brazil is third with 11%
What are the French, Germans, Italians, Spanish doing ? :)
Actually the French have translated
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
The mad race to CloudStack documentation translation has started.
Japan is leading the way with 52% of the translation complete.
China is close second with 40%
Brazil is third with 11%
Awesome!
What
Nitin Mehta created CLOUDSTACK-1073:
---
Summary: Scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs - Xenserver
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1073
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1073
Project: CloudStack
Nitin Mehta created CLOUDSTACK-1074:
---
Summary: Scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs - KVM
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1074
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1074
Project: CloudStack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nitin Mehta updated CLOUDSTACK-1074:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Scaling up CPU and RAM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nitin Mehta updated CLOUDSTACK-1073:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.1)
4.2.0
Scaling up CPU and RAM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abhinandan Prateek updated CLOUDSTACK-869:
--
Assignee: Ram Ganesh (was: Jayapal Reddy)
nTier Apps 2.0 : Support
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:35 AM
To: CloudStack DeveloperList
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account
Yes, I believe an alarm should be raised. This way it is possible to
Hyper-V unit tests make use of sample disk images (4meg and 260K)
Rather than put the sample disk images in git, do we have a webserver we can
locate them at?
DL
Code implementation for Limiting CPU and RAM to domain/account is complete and
code is available for review at : https://reviews.apache.org/r/9110/
You can also find the code on github at:
https://github.com/sanjaytripathi/incubator-cloudstack/tree/limitresources
Please review the code and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13564228#comment-13564228
]
Sanjay Tripathi commented on CLOUDSTACK-713:
Implementation of Limit CPU
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ram Ganesh updated CLOUDSTACK-869:
--
Assignee: Rajesh Battala (was: Ram Ganesh)
nTier Apps 2.0 : Support NetScalar as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9110/#review15746
---
Before I download, have there been any changes to DevCloud?
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Howdy all!
I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) release
4.0.1-incubating.
Instructions for testing and validating the artifacts can
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Before I download, have there been any changes to DevCloud?
Not the one that's needed for the 4.0 branch (this release). We have
a different one that we'll be using for 4.1.0-incubating though.
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:02 PM,
I do get this issue couple of times on windows. I tried by changing the check
value of expiredAfter() from 1000 to some higher value in ApiRateLimitTest and
it worked for me.
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: 27 January 2013 22:51
To:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Howdy all!
I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) release
4.0.1-incubating.
Instructions for testing and validating the artifacts can be found on
the wiki here:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Howdy all!
I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) release
4.0.1-incubating.
Instructions for testing and validating
venkata swamybabu budumuru created CLOUDSTACK-1075:
--
Summary: create an utility in Marvin to support nsnitro
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1075
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1075
Looks like an edge case.
The test takes 0 seconds as measured by System.currentTimeMillis(), because the
server is fast and Windows has limited accuracy. See
https://blogs.oracle.com/dholmes/entry/inside_the_hotspot_vm_clocks
I'll added a 10ms sleep to the test.
DL
-Original
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Awesome chip!!!
I've a suggestion: To make automatic wrapping of apis and its usage
you can use api discovery you can get a json (during build time or
release time of the library against a running mgmt server) or can get
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Isaac Chiang isaacchi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all:
So cool!! ( Finally I see the Ruby term in the mailing loop :) )
I have a previous work on :
https://github.com/isaacchiang/cloudstack_ruby_sdk
It is still under development, only account and some of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9122/#review15747
---
Ship it!
This builds and is a good addition. I've added some
All,
I echo Marcus' concerns regarding the timing of such a high touch change
landing in master. We are two days before code freeze. What 4.1.0
features/capabilities are gained by merging javelin? Can someone speak to the
regression test strategy that has been employed to verify the
I would like to request merge of events framework [4] branch changes in to
master to branch.
I have proposed a while ago [1], about the need for a framework to
Publish-Subscribe CloudStack to events. Initially I was planning to use
simple in-memory based publish-subscribe mechanism using google
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9097/#review15748
---
This does not apply for me.
[ke4qqq@mba docs]$ git am foo.patch
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:17 AM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:
All,
I echo Marcus' concerns regarding the timing of such a high touch change
landing in master. We are two days before code freeze. What 4.1.0
features/capabilities are gained by merging javelin? Can someone speak
FYI, we'd like to merge this soon, but we're waiting to see what's
going on with javelin, because I think we'll need to make some
changes. We merge cleanly with master now, but not with javelin. We've
addressed the issues that came up in the discussion.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Brian
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-698:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Modify build to
Chip Childers created CLOUDSTACK-1076:
-
Summary: Legal documentation improvements to separate source
distributions from packaged distributions.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1076
URL:
Hi Chiradeep.
Thanks for the review comments.
I will change API names to 'addIpToNic' and 'removeIpToNic' , update the FS
with API names.
I will also look into the meta data for secondary ip and include this section
in the FS.
Regards,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-1076:
--
Assignee: Chip Childers
Legal documentation improvements to separate source
If we don't, I'd like to see it go in soon because we (and perhaps
others) are now waiting on merging until we see what's going on with
javelin.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:17 AM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8970/#review15749
---
Ship it!
Doesn't apply perfectly, but easy enough to fix. (Caused
WRT to Hyper-V Plugin,
The public repo at https://github.com/lafferty/cshv3.git contains Phase 1
source that passes unit tests a basic integration test involving template and
VM creation. The repo was synced to Master yesterday.
So, I need to prepare a review and merge request.
Other items:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers resolved CLOUDSTACK-1076.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to master:
commit
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi all,
sarcasmBecause legal documentation is so much fun for
everyone/sarcasm, I'd like to get a reaction to the following:
As part of releasing 4.0.0-incubating, we got some feedback from the
IPMC around the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8991/#review15750
---
The technical content is correct, although the reference to
IMO - we should get the pending reviews in. There are many of them,
and they are mostly for 4.1 features (this included).
However, as I asked on the other thread, waiting for Alex to comment
on the timing for Javelin.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:17 AM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:
All,
I echo Marcus' concerns regarding the timing of such a high touch change
landing in master. We are two days before code freeze.
On Jan. 17, 2013, 8:02 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Ship It!
added feature branch add_remove_nics, close this review request.
- Marcus
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
I would like to request merge of events framework [4] branch changes in to
master to branch.
I have proposed a while ago [1], about the need for a framework to
Publish-Subscribe CloudStack to events. Initially I was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13564380#comment-13564380
]
Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-1056:
-
I've committed this. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcus Sorensen resolved CLOUDSTACK-1056.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Went ahead and fixed this
S3 secondary
Donal,
A couple of questions. First, awesome to see that there are good unit
tests in there. I seem to remember you mentioning that the HyperV
plugin has to be compiled on Windows. Can you confirm this? If this
is the case, can you confirm that the plugin is being setup as an
optional build
Can someone tell me if DevCloud and DevCloud2 are running Xen or XenServer?
I'm not sure how to query out that info from the control VM.
Thanks!
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks for the info, Marcus.
I just verified that I can
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Can someone tell me if DevCloud and DevCloud2 are running Xen or XenServer?
I'm not sure how to query out that info from the control VM.
Thanks!
DevCloud and DevCloud2 are both running Xen + XAPI - which is
Thanks David
So, is XAPI the way CloudStack communicates to Xen? I'm just coming up to
speed on Xen, by the way.
Also, when you say, is essentially XenServer in the eyes of CloudStack,
what does that mean? The two (Xen + XAPI or XenServer) are looked at as if
they are the same?
On Mon, Jan
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks David
So, is XAPI the way CloudStack communicates to Xen? I'm just coming up to
speed on Xen, by the way.
Also, when you say, is essentially XenServer in the eyes of CloudStack,
what does that mean?
Is the objection to the storage engine or to the Spring usage?
As I tried to explain in various emails, the storage engine code won't affect
anyone as it's not hooked in.
If the objection is to Spring usage, it is high touch but low risk because once
it all compiles and loads, there's no
Obviously that doesn't answer the question for this release, and I
think John's question is a good one. What benefits does 4.1 accrue
from landing javelin at this point? Obviously after code freeze no new
features get to make it in, so from a feature standpoint, if it isn't
directly enabled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13564453#comment-13564453
]
Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-873:
-
Attempted a fix using vmware 4.0 SDK to
I think this is not explained very well in the FS.
The entire cmd/response layer represents CloudStack's REST-like (using that
very loosely) resources. The way api_refactoring achieves this is by making
use of annotations. So in effect, the annotations describe the REST API so,
therefore,
Cool...so, as far as you know, David, if I have an iSCSI target that seems
to be working (I can access it from the iSCSI initiator on my Mac OS X
box), I should be able to add a Primary Storage type in CS (for a cluster
using Xen + XAPI) that leverages that iSCSI target?
That is what I'm
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:08 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE][ACS41] javelin to master
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
On Mon,
On #3, since RabbitMQ's java client library is licensed under MPL 1.1,
I assume it would fall under the Category B list of licenses.
From http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b :
By including only the object/binary form, there is less exposed
surface area of the third-party work
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8613/#review15752
---
I tried to apply your snapshot patches and test them, as they look
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8632/#review15753
---
I tried to apply your snapshot patches and test them, as they look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Min Chen resolved CLOUDSTACK-274.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Two error codes mapped to same value in API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13564522#comment-13564522
]
Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-274:
-
Fixed in commit
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013, at 08:20 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
I'd rather us not release with a double -incubating. Joe, can you
please rename then and restart the release VOTE?
Half the -incubating, coming up. Sorry about that - thanks for the
catch!
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Sorry I may be late on this topic
Routing is designed to have the format.
Event-source.Event-Category.Event-Type.Resource.ResourceUUID. For e.g.
A message is published with a routing key:
management-server:ActionEvent:SNAPSHOT-CREATE:Snapshot:0a7ea29e-
691b-11e2-b
afa-2c3ba27d8c47.
A
Inline
On 1/25/13 4:03 PM, Brian Angus blan...@betterservers.com wrote:
My answers inline...
On 01/24/2013 06:49 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Brian is probably the right guy to answer some of these, but I'll chime
in
on a few.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Inline
On 1/25/13 4:03 PM, Brian Angus blan...@betterservers.com wrote:
My answers inline...
On 01/24/2013 06:49 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Brian is probably the right guy to answer some of these, but I'll
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Obviously that doesn't answer the question for this release, and I
think John's question is a good one. What benefits does 4.1 accrue
from landing javelin at this point? Obviously after code freeze no new
features get to
AFAIK, the plugin does not need Windows to compile. Dependencies not captured
by Java are encapsulated in Python scripts that are not checked by the build.
Instead, the unit tests are skipped by default. These tests rely on Hyper-V
2012, which is not on either Linux or Windows by default.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote:
AFAIK, the plugin does not need Windows to compile. Dependencies not
captured by Java are encapsulated in Python scripts that are not checked by
the build.
My fault, thanks for clarifying!
Instead, the unit
Members present: edison_cs, topcloud, jburwell
Meeting summary:
1. Preface
IRC log follows:
# 1. Preface #
19:02:50 [edison_cs]: jburwell: about the storage stuff, I am trying to hook up
the inferfaces listed in my design document into mgt server, made a lot
I'm not comfortable with the instructions going into the user guide.
Setup and deployment will be heavy touch. A developer's page has an implicit
warning and the ability to evolve through contribution.
I'll get cracking on a patch. Better to be on the release train half-dressed
than
On Jan 28, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Obviously that doesn't answer the question for this release, and I
think John's question is a good one. What benefits does 4.1 accrue
from
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Inline
On 1/25/13 4:03 PM, Brian Angus blan...@betterservers.com wrote:
My answers inline...
On 01/24/2013 06:49 PM, Marcus
Mike, I am out of my comfort zone here, but I believe you need to define a
storage repository on your xen host:
In devcloud Rohit did it like this:
xe sr-create host-uuid=$hostuuid name-label=local-storage shared=false
type=file device-config:location=/opt/storage/primary
-sebastien
On Jan
Mice/Rohit/Prasanna,
When I'm building the systemvm profile, using either mvn -Dnonoss
-DskipTests=true -Psystemvm clean install or mvn -Pdeveloper, systemvm clean
install I'm seeing this error:
File
G'Day!
Because I appended an extra -incubating to the version, I'm re-starting
the vote for the 4.0.1-incubating release.
Instructions for testing and validating the artifacts can be found on
the wiki here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+test+procedure
Is there a bug logged for this issue?
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Mice Xia [mailto:weiran.x...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 10:10 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: systemvm.iso and injectkeys.sh issue in nonoss mgmt server?
I ran into the same
The patch is changing database schema (altering column), we should ask
Chiradeep for network refactoring impact and Prachi/Kishan for db
schema changes.
Regards.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Rohit, Murali
Can you review the patch? Is
Joe,
Any interface you see that ends with Manager is an internal interface. No
parameter checks, acl, etc should happen with method calling that interface.
Any interface that ends with Service is meant to be an external interface. Any
method from that interface should do parameter
David,
I mentioned to Chip on IRC that the biggest challenge for me is that there is
not a unit test suite that we can run before and after the merge to verify it.
Therefore, until we expand our unit test coverage, merges of structural changes
such as javelin will carry an inherently higher
Alex - I'm specifically concerned about getting the pending features
into master. Does merging Javelin (1) not impact those pending
features, and (2) is it a pre-requisite to any pending features?
What's the harm in merging into master immediately after the 4.1
branch is cut? That would
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Forward from the user list. Rohit - want to answer?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Charles Moulliard ch0...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:51 PM
Subject: Question concerning json
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9126/
---
(Updated Jan. 28, 2013, 9:56 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers
Chip,
Again, we have to divide this into two parts.
For Spring changes:
I think it will have some effect on any pending feature to be merged but it
will not be very large. It's a matter of changing some annotations at the
component level.
As for is there any pending features
I have install cloud stack 4.0 on CentOS 6.3. I am unable to log in to the
admin console in the web UI. I get an error that there is no /client/api/
and that the servlet is unavailable.
David Russell
Network Technician
SyncGlobal Telecom
O - 678 821-1133│F - 770
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:58 PM, David Russell david_russ...@syncglobal.net
wrote:
I have install cloud stack 4.0 on CentOS 6.3. I am unable to log in to the
admin console in the web UI. I get an error that there is no /client/api/
and that the servlet is unavailable.
** **
*David
+1
Tested vm life cycles manually with DevCloud2.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
G'Day!
Because I appended an extra -incubating to the version, I'm re-starting
the vote for the 4.0.1-incubating release.
Instructions for testing and validating the
The patch was add as a file attachment.
Is that the correct procedure?
DL
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
Donal Lafferty
Sent: 28 January 2013 21:56
To: Chip Childers; Alex Huang
Cc: cloudstack; Donal Lafferty
Subject: Re:
Hi guys,
Yeah, I'm trying to use OpenXenManager, but am seeing mixed results.
Sometimes it just crashes.
It did seem to attach my iSCSI storage, though, but does not show it from
the GUI (I can see it in Xen directly).
Weird
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Clayton Weise cwe...@iswest.net
are you able to provision vm's, outside of cloudstack, using that
host/iscsi target?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Yeah, I'm trying to use OpenXenManager, but am seeing mixed results.
Sometimes it just crashes.
It did seem
It should have been the base diff, not an attachment. Otherwise we
can't use reviewboard to actually review the changes.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote:
The patch was add as a file attachment.
Is that the correct procedure?
DL
-Original
OpenXenManager is spotty at best. If you have the option available of a
windows workstation then run XenCenter otherwise the xe commands are your best
bet.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 2:13 PM
To:
Oh, and the 'xe' stuff aside you can just do basic iSCSI operations just as if
it were a regular Cent/RHEL box with the open-iscsi tools.
-Original Message-
From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cwe...@iswest.net]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 2:25 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
I can see if our test group has a XenCenter instance running...they likely
do (since those guys test our SAN against all sorts of configs).
I didn't actually kick a VM off, but I went through the process of doing so
and was able to select my iSCSI SR.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Clayton
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
