Marcus,
I just saw this FS. Sorry if I'm a little late. I have a few questions.
- On updateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine: Does it work even if the VM is
running? If it does, how do you change the default route on the actual VM?
- On addNicToVirtualMachine: The API is a
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:01:49AM -0500, prasanna wrote:
On 8 March 2013 22:24, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
I'm going to start off a branch specifically to do BVT on
simulator and devCloud so that we can at least have system vms/vrs
and business logic tested.
Hey Alex -
Update:
The setup is now reliably functional with xen and kvm hosts coming up
successfully, mgmt servers spinning up fine, server health is also
good with systemvms up and functional. A misbehaving network issue
prevented us from turning on the infra. This is now worked around:
All the sequence
Thanks Marcus, the jenkins change that caused this was well before
yours. So it might just be an environment issue. I lost my ssh-keys
thanks to a cloudstack bug :) and can't get into fix that issue.
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 11:47:36AM -0500, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I took a quick peek because I
Brian implemented the code, but I'll look through it and see if I can
answer your questions.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Marcus,
I just saw this FS. Sorry if I’m a little late. I have a few questions.
- On
Awesome work Prasanna! Kudos for the tremendous effort!!!
Ahmad
On Mar 10, 2013, at 8:48 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
Update:
The setup is now reliably functional with xen and kvm hosts coming up
successfully, mgmt servers spinning up fine, server health is also
good with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9839/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Current trunk Cloudstack
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 05:58:27PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
Already checked in master.
commit e35ce6587a2519fdbc56e8859ad6aa7dac00dd47
Author: Sheng Yang sheng.y...@citrix.com
Date: Fri Mar 8 17:42:06 2013 -0800
CLOUDSTACK-1461: Don't set dns server for non-default ipv6 network
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 06:52:46PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
Devs,
I was just reading through the by-laws we voted in (sorry, I am about a
month late in doing this, I know) and it occurred to me that we might have
the wrong definition of lazy consensus.
Specifically, we define it here:
On March 11, 2013, 2:07 a.m., Chip Childers wrote:
There are a couple of minor questions I have (see line specific comments).
Can you please correct or answer, and then submit a new patch?
Sure, no problem!
On March 11, 2013, 2:07 a.m., Chip Childers wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9818/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Bugfix CLOUDSTACK-1594:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9818/
---
(Updated March 11, 2013, 2:29 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9818/
---
(Updated March 11, 2013, 2:29 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9818/
---
(Updated March 11, 2013, 2:29 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Nitin,
Could you give an example for this?
I'm not aware of how many operations that do not involve state change but need
lock VM, if there are many of them, perhaps we need a more generic way to
handle this, like adding lockVM()/unlockVM()/checkVMLock() methods and use them
in these
The security virtual appliance in this solution has only one NIC, and it
connects to management network in order to communicate with the security
manager center.
(this is a little irrelevant to cloudstack) It intercepts the traffic by
mechanism provided by hypervisors, for xenserver, it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9839/
---
(Updated March 11, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
I'm going to second Hari's comment in regards to management network. Please
also consider storage network support on dvS.
I ran through series of tests over the weekend, I will have a detailed report
tomorrow.
Thanks
Ilya
Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Sateesh,
As we increase
Mice - You might want to read the conversation at the link below
http://markmail.org/message/u6nys3zo6w2rntqx?q=Scaling+up+CPU+and+RAM+for+r
unning+VMs+list:org%2Eapache%2Eincubator%2Ecloudstack-dev+date:201303+page
=1
As Alex suggests that we already do some kind of syncronization when the
API
Hey Edison,
Thanks for that info.
When grantAccess and revokeAccess are invoked, do I have access to the IQN
of the host in question? What about if that host is using CHAP
credentials? Where do those come into play?
Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Mike Tutkowski
Roxanne - Thanks very much for working on this.
My take on the fix was to remove the entry for secondary storage from host
table as we do not create an agent for it. We should rather have another
table for secondary storage and related info.
On 11/03/13 7:59 AM, roxanne chang
Because of the class, from which I am getting alerts is present in
com.cloud.alert package.
Thanks,
Anshul
On 08/03/13 18:19, Alex Huang wrote:
Why not org.apache.cloudstack.alert? It is an apache project.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Anshul Gangwar
Sent: Thursday, March 7,
Mice can you review and respond to my comment below
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 5:54 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; 'Mice Xia'; Alex Huang; Mice Xia
Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan
Subject:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9587/#review17677
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajesh Battala
On March 8, 2013, 8:07 a.m.,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:58:55PM +0530, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 10:26 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk
I've been
25 matches
Mail list logo
