Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-03-14 Thread Bharat Kumar
If the remove fails add will also fail. Bharat. On Mar 13, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: If the remove fails, will the add still succeed? On 3/5/13 11:20 PM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: The changes will be atomic. before removing

Re: [Discuss] Support for multiple ip ranges.

2013-03-14 Thread Bharat Kumar
the first subnet which has free IPs. Also we do not allow addition of a subnet which is superset of the existing subnet. Bharat. On Mar 13, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: On 3/11/13 5:13 AM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Chiradeep

Re: [Discuss] Support for multiple ip ranges.

2013-03-11 Thread Bharat Kumar
still not clear. For the functionality that already works, are you modifying them? How are you going to handle management IP Ranges. Please update the FS with your implementation plans. Thanks in advance. Regards, Manan Shah On 1/25/13 12:46 AM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com

Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-03-05 Thread Bharat Kumar
or nothing? Existing range E= 100-200, in use U=101,121,131 New request: add=201-301, remove=100-201 Or E = 100-200, U=110-120 A = 150-250, R=100-149 etc On 1/24/13 10:13 PM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Thank you Manan for pointing this out i intended to say multiple

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1410) Overcommit feature breaks compatibility between 4.0/4.1 management server and 4.2 agent

2013-02-27 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13588461#comment-13588461 ] Bharat Kumar commented on CLOUDSTACK-1410: -- Thanks for fixing this widodh

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-1410) Overcommit feature breaks compatibility between 4.0/4.1 management server and 4.2 agent

2013-02-27 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13588461#comment-13588461 ] Bharat Kumar edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-1410 at 2/27/13 4:01 PM

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-711) CPU and Memory OverCommit

2013-02-26 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharat Kumar resolved CLOUDSTACK-711. - Resolution: Fixed https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1395) Upgrade script for cpu and memory overcommit feature.

2013-02-26 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-1395: Summary: Upgrade script for cpu and memory overcommit feature. Key: CLOUDSTACK-1395 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1395 Project

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1384) Cloudstack might show usage 100% when overcommit ratio is decreased.

2013-02-25 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-1384: Summary: Cloudstack might show usage 100% when overcommit ratio is decreased. Key: CLOUDSTACK-1384 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1384

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-711 Cpu and ram overcommit at cluster level.

2013-02-22 Thread bharat kumar
/capacity/CapacityManagerTest.java PRE-CREATION server/test/com/cloud/resource/MockResourceManagerImpl.java 889318b vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/util/VmwareHelper.java 47ff8e2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/diff/ Testing --- Did manual testing. Thanks, bharat

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-711 Cpu and ram overcommit at cluster level.

2013-02-21 Thread bharat kumar
testing. Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Regarding cpu and ram overcommit feature

2013-02-20 Thread Bharat Kumar
on the VM already running. -abhi On 13/02/13 4:19 PM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, After some discussion i think the new overcommit ratio should not affect the VMs already deployed. It will only effect the VMs deployed after the change. I we need

Regarding cpu and ram overcommit.

2013-02-20 Thread Bharat Kumar
The cpu and ram overcommit feature depends on availability hypervisor specific features like DMC in case of xenserver. The availability of these features depends on the type of licenses that are being used. Enabling these features requires changing the license and i think should be done by

Re: Regarding cpu and ram overcommit.

2013-02-20 Thread Bharat Kumar
On 20/02/13 10:28 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com] Sent: 20 February 2013 18:18 To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Regarding cpu and ram overcommit. The cpu and ram

Re: Regarding cpu and ram overcommit feature

2013-02-20 Thread Bharat Kumar
for memory for a VM because of overcommit - can you please detail what the setting before this change was and what you intend to do because of this feature? Hari -Original Message- From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:18 AM

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-711 Cpu and ram overcommit at cluster level.

2013-02-18 Thread bharat kumar
/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java 1838ed2 server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineProfileImpl.java e83d6a0 vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/util/VmwareHelper.java 47ff8e2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/diff/ Testing --- Did manual testing. Thanks, bharat kumar

Regarding cpu and ram overcommit feature

2013-02-13 Thread Bharat Kumar
Hi All, After some discussion i think the new overcommit ratio should not affect the VMs already deployed. It will only effect the VMs deployed after the change. I we need to reconfigure the previously running VMs we need to stop start them. I will call this out in the Functional spec.

Regarding cpu and ram overcommit feature

2013-02-12 Thread Bharat Kumar
Hi all, As a part of this feature we need to implement a method to update the overcommit ratios. when we update the overcommit ratios all the Vms in the cluster need to be reconfigured as per the new values. In order to do this i need to send some commands to the hypervisor and would like

Re: Regarding cpu and ram overcommit feature

2013-02-12 Thread Bharat Kumar
do not update the overcommit ratios on existing vms ? I donĀ¹t see these ratios being changed quite often in the cloud. On 12/02/13 2:57 PM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all, As a part of this feature we need to implement a method to update the overcommit ratios. when

Re: Regarding Cpu and memory overcommit feature.

2013-02-05 Thread Bharat Kumar
Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 10:44 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: FW: Regarding Cpu and memory overcommit feature. On 01/02/13 4:22 PM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-711 Cpu and ram overcommit at cluster level.

2013-02-01 Thread bharat kumar
/VirtualMachineProfileImpl.java e83d6a0 server/test/com/cloud/capacity/CapacityManagerTest.java PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/diff/ Testing --- Did manual testing. Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-711 Cpu and ram overcommit at cluster level.

2013-01-31 Thread Bharat Kumar
Nitin thanks for the review comments. will create a branch and fix the issues. Bharat. On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:35 PM, bharat kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.commailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote: This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/ Review

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-711 Cpu and ram overcommit at cluster level.

2013-01-31 Thread bharat kumar
by zero error. - bharat --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/#review15865 --- On Jan. 30, 2013, 3:05 p.m., bharat kumar

Review Request: Cloudstack-711 Cpu and ram overcommit at cluster level.

2013-01-30 Thread bharat kumar
://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/diff/ Testing (updated) --- Did manual testing. Thanks, bharat kumar

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1098) Discuss what should we display on the dash board.

2013-01-30 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-1098: Summary: Discuss what should we display on the dash board. Key: CLOUDSTACK-1098 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1098 Project: CloudStack

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1098) Discuss what should we display on the dashboard.

2013-01-30 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-1098: - Summary: Discuss what should we display on the dashboard. (was: Discuss what

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-701) Support non-contiguous VLAN ranges

2013-01-29 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-701: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 Support non-contiguous

Re: [Discuss] Support for multiple ip ranges.

2013-01-25 Thread Bharat Kumar
Hi Manan, find my answers inline. On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:22 AM, Manan Shah manan.s...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Bharat Kumar, I have some additional questions regarding this spec. 1. Can you specify the scope of your feature? Assuming you are only addressing the Guest IP part

Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-01-24 Thread Bharat Kumar
for this requirement. Please leverage that. Regards, Manan Shah On 1/3/13 10:33 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:37:28AM +0530, Bharat Kumar wrote: Hi all, In cloudstack we specify the vlan ranges in advanced zone. These vlans are used while creating

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-702) Multiple IP Ranges

2013-01-23 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-702: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.0.2 Multiple IP Ranges

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-702) Multiple IP Ranges

2013-01-23 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-702: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.2) 4.2.0 Multiple IP Ranges

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-702) Multiple IP Ranges

2013-01-21 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13555858#comment-13555858 ] Bharat Kumar edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-702 at 1/21/13 8:26 AM

Re: [Discuss] Cpu and Ram overcommit.

2013-01-21 Thread Bharat Kumar
as described in FS. I think we will use dedicated resources for now and may be in future implement something like cluster tags. Thanks Prashant kumar Mishra -Original Message- From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:23 PM To: cloudstack

Re: [Discuss] Support for multiple ip ranges.

2013-01-19 Thread Bharat Kumar
. Is this supported in upgraded environment? The upgrade will not modify the existing ip ranges. we can just add new ip ranges after the upgrade. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 5:27 PM

Re: [Discuss] Cpu and Ram overcommit.

2013-01-17 Thread Bharat Kumar
/server, please point that out in a subtask for your bug and let me know. --Alex -Original Message- From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 3:16 AM To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-702) Multiple IP Ranges

2013-01-16 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13555858#comment-13555858 ] Bharat Kumar commented on CLOUDSTACK-702: - link to the functional spec. https

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-701) Support non-contiguous VLAN ranges

2013-01-16 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13555860#comment-13555860 ] Bharat Kumar commented on CLOUDSTACK-701: - link to the functional spec. https

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-970) when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as Removed in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-970: --- Summary: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as Removed in template_zone_ref table. Key: CLOUDSTACK-970 URL: https

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as Removed in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread bharat kumar
/VMTemplateDaoImpl.java 2a0dfc8 server/src/com/cloud/template/HyervisorTemplateAdapter.java bdb89f6 server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java 1e87de2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/diff/ Testing --- I have tested this on the asf branch. Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as Removed in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread bharat kumar
2a0dfc8 server/src/com/cloud/template/HyervisorTemplateAdapter.java bdb89f6 server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java 1e87de2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/diff/ Testing --- I have tested this on the asf branch. Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as Removed in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread bharat kumar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/#review15303 --- Ship it! Ship It! - bharat kumar On Jan. 13, 2013, 5:14 p.m

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as Removed in template_zone_ref table.

2013-01-13 Thread bharat kumar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/#review15304 --- Ship it! Ship It! - bharat kumar On Jan. 13, 2013, 5:14 p.m

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-711) CPU and Memory OverCommit

2013-01-11 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharat Kumar reassigned CLOUDSTACK-711: --- Assignee: Bharat Kumar (was: Nitin Mehta) CPU and Memory OverCommit

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-711) CPU and Memory OverCommit

2013-01-11 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13550994#comment-13550994 ] Bharat Kumar commented on CLOUDSTACK-711: - link to the functional spec. https

[Discuss] Support for multiple ip ranges.

2013-01-08 Thread Bharat Kumar
). This feature allows adding multiple management ip ranges in advanced and basic zones, and guest ip ranges in basic zones. Regards, Bharat Kumar.

[Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-01-03 Thread Bharat Kumar
ranges. This feature will enable adding non contiguous vlan ranges. Regards, Bharat Kumar.

Re: [Discuss] Cpu and Ram overcommit.

2012-12-26 Thread Bharat Kumar
. Please make sure that you take care of that as well. Thanks for the suggestions. -Nitin On 26-Dec-2012, at 11:32 AM, Bharat Kumar wrote: Hi all, Presently in Cloudstack there is a provision for cpu overcommit and no provision for the ram overcommit. There is no way to configure

Re: [Discuss] Cpu and Ram overcommit.

2012-12-26 Thread Bharat Kumar
? Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 6:09 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discuss] Cpu and Ram overcommit. Nitin thanks

Re: [Discuss] Cpu and Ram overcommit.

2012-12-26 Thread Bharat Kumar
, there is no issue 2a. if there is a conflict (i.e. current allocation would conflict with the new value) - should we reject this change? (preferred) 2b. or accept the change but not add more VMs anymore -Original Message- From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com] Sent

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-568) Source template id is recorded incorrectly.

2012-11-29 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-568: --- Summary: Source template id is recorded incorrectly. Key: CLOUDSTACK-568 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-568 Project: CloudStack

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-568) Source template id is recorded incorrectly.

2012-11-29 Thread Bharat Kumar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-568: Affects Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0) 4.0.0 Source

Review Request: Sumarry of changes: Changed the function addTemplateToZone VMTemplateDaoImpl.java. This was needed as the previous version tried to update the removed column of the row in template_zon

2012-09-11 Thread bharat kumar
/HyervisorTemplateAdapter.java bdb89f6 server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java 1e87de2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/diff/ Testing --- I have tested this on the asf branch. Thanks, bharat kumar

Re: Review Request: Sumarry of changes: Changed the function addTemplateToZone VMTemplateDaoImpl.java. This was needed as the previous version tried to update the removed column of the row in template

2012-09-11 Thread bharat kumar
/storage/dao/VMTemplateDaoImpl.java 2a0dfc8 server/src/com/cloud/template/HyervisorTemplateAdapter.java bdb89f6 server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java 1e87de2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/diff/ Testing --- I have tested this on the asf branch. Thanks, bharat

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as Removed in template_zone_ref table.

2012-09-11 Thread bharat kumar
: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/diff/ Testing --- I have tested this on the asf branch. Thanks, bharat kumar