RE: 4.1 certificate issue

2013-03-18 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 7:24 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.1 certificate issue On Mar 15, 2013, at 8:11 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote: What blocked you is not ssl

RE: local.storage.uuid in agent.properties

2013-03-14 Thread Edison Su
The uuid is a shortcut to find out local storage, when restart cloud-agent. I agree, we should only take a look at local.storage.path, instead of uuid. -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:05 PM To:

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions

2013-03-11 Thread Edison Su
storage box? From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 9:28 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Edison Su Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions Hey Edison, Thanks for that info. When grantAccess and revokeAccess are invoked, do I have

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

2013-03-11 Thread Edison Su
+1 -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator Hi, I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on

RE: [CI] marvin tests on jenkins

2013-03-11 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Prasanna Santhanam Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 8:49 AM To: CloudStack Dev Subject: Re: [CI] marvin tests on jenkins Update: The setup is now reliably functional with xen and kvm hosts coming

RE: Feature request: SAS support

2013-03-11 Thread Edison Su
I think you can use SAS as local storage, which should be supported in CloudStack already. May need to manually setup a local storage on each hypervisor host before adding the host into CloudStack. Do you have extra feature requests if the existing SAS support is not enough for you?

RE: Making use of a 4.2 storage plug-in from the GUI or API

2013-03-08 Thread Edison Su
, to register the storage into cloudstack. From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 2:46 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Edison Su Subject: Making use of a 4.2 storage plug-in from the GUI or API Hi, As you may remember, I'm leveraging

RE: Making use of a 4.2 storage plug-in from the GUI or API

2013-03-08 Thread Edison Su
, so do the storage plugin. From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 4:09 PM To: Edison Su Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Making use of a 4.2 storage plug-in from the GUI or API OK, cool - thanks for the info, Edison. When you say

RE: Question about Zone-wide Primary Storage (4.2 Feature)

2013-03-07 Thread Edison Su
: Thursday, March 07, 2013 1:47 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Edison Su Subject: Question about Zone-wide Primary Storage (4.2 Feature) Hi, It looks like in 4.2 we can assign Primary Storage to be not only for a single Cluster, but Zone-wide (or specific to a Host). I'm wondering how

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions

2013-03-07 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 9:22 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions Hi, I'm working on implementing a storage plug-in for CS 4.2. I'm looking at

Re: Review Request: [CLOUDSTACK-1535] kvm agent will silently ignore many exceptions

2013-03-06 Thread edison su
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9774/#review17479 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On March 6, 2013, 9:54 a.m

[DISCUSS]Incremental build

2013-03-06 Thread Edison Su
Maven 3 doesn't support incremental build(https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/incremental-builds.html), so it takes a long time(4-7mins) to make a build, even I just make a small changes in the source code. I know, you can specify which projects to build by using -pl instead of build whole

RE: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk

2013-03-05 Thread Edison Su
at 12:41 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 12:13 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk For those who don't know

RE: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

2013-03-05 Thread Edison Su
Recently, I read a topic about, why automated test keeping failing(http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/185819/why-does-automated-testing-keep-failing-in-my-company/185839#185839), the comment is really resonated with me: Most unit tests are questionable in value. Since the vast

Re: Review Request: Add the ability to specify different VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM

2013-03-04 Thread edison su
On March 2, 2013, 1:10 a.m., edison su wrote: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java, line 802 https://reviews.apache.org/r/9604/diff/1/?file=262223#file262223line802 Wondering, what's the purpose of network.bridge.type used

RE: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk

2013-03-04 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 12:13 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk For those who don't know (this probably doesn't matter, but...), when KVM brings up

RE: issue with 4.1

2013-03-04 Thread Edison Su
I even think db upgrade should be separated from mgt server. -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 2:11 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: issue with 4.1 +1 (again) On 3/4/13 1:06 PM,

Re: Review Request: Add the ability to specify different VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM

2013-03-01 Thread edison su
/LibvirtComputingResource.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/9604/#comment36762 Wondering, what's the purpose of network.bridge.type used for? Can we treat com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.OvsVifDriver as another vif driver? Then libvirt.vif.driver is enough? - edison su On March 1, 2013, 7:46

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1406) ZWPS:createStoragePool API doesn't accept scope parameter

2013-02-27 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13588590#comment-13588590 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-1406: --- could you test on the very latest code

RE: Issue in storage_refactor branch

2013-02-27 Thread Edison Su
Hi Mike, cloud you try it on latest master branch? I already merged storage_refactor branch into master already. From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:44 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su Subject: Issue

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1386) BASIC zone SSVM fail to start due to exception

2013-02-26 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13587700#comment-13587700 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-1386: --- Please attache correct management

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1386) BASIC zone SSVM fail to start due to exception

2013-02-26 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su resolved CLOUDSTACK-1386. --- Resolution: Incomplete BASIC zone SSVM fail to start due to exception

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1403) Storage and console-proxy related error

2013-02-26 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1403: - Assignee: Kelven Yang (was: edison su) Vmware issue, may need you take a look

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1406) ZWPS:createStoragePool API doesn't accept scope parameter

2013-02-26 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13587707#comment-13587707 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-1406: --- Could you give any detailed

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1406) ZWPS:createStoragePool API doesn't accept scope parameter

2013-02-26 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su resolved CLOUDSTACK-1406. --- Resolution: Incomplete ZWPS:createStoragePool API doesn't accept scope parameter

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-724) Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-02-26 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su reassigned CLOUDSTACK-724: Assignee: Jessica Wang (was: edison su) Need to add ui for zone wide storage. It has

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1380) NPE While Creating System VM's

2013-02-25 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13586043#comment-13586043 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-1380: --- This is due to fix https

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1380) NPE While Creating System VM's

2013-02-25 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su resolved CLOUDSTACK-1380. --- Resolution: Fixed fixed in 310e99087ff8f46ac903f2a28169f3ffe2d13ebd on master

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1387) mvn clean install failed to copy scripts folder to client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.2.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes.

2013-02-25 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su resolved CLOUDSTACK-1387. --- Resolution: Fixed fixed in cc25e58dc2b9e5ed334699b3bc11d5baa05dab44

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1383) Deploying basic zone on 4.1 fails in NPE

2013-02-25 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13586386#comment-13586386 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-1383: --- Is this a bug reproduced in master

RE: [MERGE]Storage refactor branch

2013-02-22 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 2:46 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su Cc: John Burwell jburw...@basho.com (jburw...@basho.com); Mike Tutkowski (mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com) Subject

RE: Storage refactor db and baremetal diversion fixes

2013-02-22 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:57 AM To: Edison Su; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Frank Zhang Subject: Storage refactor db and baremetal diversion fixes Hi Edison

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1373) Upgrade from 4.0 to 4.2.0 (master) fails with exception

2013-02-22 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13584495#comment-13584495 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-1373: --- Or I can put some java code

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1373) Upgrade from 4.0 to 4.2.0 (master) fails with exception

2013-02-22 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13584493#comment-13584493 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-1373: --- There is a hole in the db upgrade

RE: [MERGE]Storage refactor branch

2013-02-22 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 10:03 AM To: Edison Su Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [MERGE]Storage refactor branch Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad Op 22 feb. 2013 om 18:32

RE: Storage refactor db and baremetal diversion fixes

2013-02-22 Thread Edison Su
, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:57 AM To: Edison Su; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Frank Zhang Subject

RE: Where to supply CHAP info when using iSCSI in CloudStack

2013-02-21 Thread Edison Su
CHAP is not supported in current code. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:15 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Where to supply CHAP info when using iSCSI in CloudStack From this

RE: Merge 4.1-new-db-schema.sql to db/db/schema-40to410.sql

2013-02-15 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 2:58 AM To: Edison Su; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sheng Yang; Alex Huang; Kishan Kavala; Min Chen Subject: Merge 4.1-new-db

RE: [MERGE]Storage refactor branch

2013-02-15 Thread Edison Su
: [MERGE]Storage refactor branch Hey Edison, Thanks for the update -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 12:13 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: John Burwell jburw...@basho.com (jburw...@basho.com); Mike

RE: [Discuss] Name convention of class variable

2013-02-15 Thread Edison Su
+1, no _, during the refactor, I removed all the _ as much as I can already. -Original Message- From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 2:12 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [Discuss] Name convention of class variable

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1302) Add per storage setting for cache=none/writeback/writethrough options for VMs on KVM hypervisor

2013-02-15 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13579654#comment-13579654 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-1302: --- We can add an option in disk offering

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1302) Add per storage setting for cache=none/writeback/writethrough options for VMs on KVM hypervisor

2013-02-15 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13579679#comment-13579679 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-1302: --- Seems vmware has API to configure

[MERGE]Storage refactor branch

2013-02-14 Thread Edison Su
Hi All, Here is the update from storage refactor branch since last week: 1. clean/hook up snapshot into new storage framework, separate taking snapshot and backup snapshot. Add a snapshotstrategy interface for people want to change or replace how snapshot is processed in cloudstack.

RE: Can't run Jetty on storage_refactor branch

2013-02-13 Thread Edison Su
The more memory, the better. -Original Message- From: Jessica Wang Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:23 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su Subject: RE: Can't run Jetty on storage_refactor branch Edison, How about on master branch? On master branch

RE: VMSnapshotVO.java missing?

2013-02-13 Thread Edison Su
fixed on the master branch already, please check out the latest code. -Original Message- From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [mailto:vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 3:21 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: VMSnapshotVO.java missing?

RE: master branch building error [ERROR] C:\cloudstack-apache\incubator-cloudstack\server\src\com\cloud\vm\snapshot\dao\VMSnapshotDao.java:[24,28] error: cannot find symbol

2013-02-13 Thread Edison Su
fixed on master already, please check out latest code. -Original Message- From: Jessica Wang [mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 12:28 PM To: mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: master branch building error

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1211) Network operations are Blocked for the Read-only file system of Virtual Router

2013-02-12 Thread edison su
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9384/#review16469 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Feb. 8, 2013, 10:14 a.m., Wei

RE: what's rule for using @Component and xml bean file

2013-02-12 Thread Edison Su
IMHO, if you want configuration(your class needed to be configured by admin, such as all the existing adaptors/manager), use xml, otherwise, use @Component or @named. Switch everything into one style over anther, is really a good idea? For example, I want to my class to be a singleton, and I

RE: Can't run Jetty on storage_refactor branch

2013-02-12 Thread Edison Su
If you are running jetty on maven command line, run the following: export MAVEN_OPTS=-XX:MaxPermSize=512m -Xmx1024m before jetty:run. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:22 PM To:

RE: QEMU support in CloudStack

2013-02-08 Thread Edison Su
Wondering, how do you get devcloud-kvm work? -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 10:02 AM To: Alex Huang Cc: Sebastien Goasguen; Wido den Hollander; cloudstack- d...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: QEMU support in

RE: QEMU support in CloudStack

2013-02-08 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 10:57 AM To: Edison Su Cc: Alex Huang; Sebastien Goasguen; Wido den Hollander; cloudstack- d...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: QEMU support in CloudStack Hmm, looks like

RE: can't deploydb on 4.1 branch, why don't you face it?

2013-02-08 Thread Edison Su
cloud-utils-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar? What's the jar used for? For test? -Original Message- From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:29 PM To: Vijayendra Bhamidipati; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: can't deploydb on 4.1

RE: Storage plug-in question

2013-02-07 Thread Edison Su
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 8:07 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Edison Su Subject: Storage plug-in question Hi Edison, I have a quick question for you. :) A week or so ago, I went through the process of setting

RE: Supporting SolidFire QoS Before 4.2

2013-02-07 Thread Edison Su
the hypervisors. From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:18 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su; Marcus Sorensen Subject: Supporting SolidFire QoS Before 4.2 Hi everyone, I learned yesterday that Edison's new storage plug

RE: Setting up CloudStack to use XenServer with iSCSI

2013-02-07 Thread Edison Su
It should work, maybe you can try the latest code in storage_refactor branch. From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:51 PM To: Edison Su Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen Subject: Re: Setting up CloudStack to use

RE: Supporting SolidFire QoS Before 4.2

2013-02-07 Thread Edison Su
[mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:14 PM To: Edison Su Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen Subject: Re: Supporting SolidFire QoS Before 4.2 The logic might be something like this: User picks a Compute Offering with storage tag SolidFire. CSP's GUI

RE: [VOTE] Revert back to old mailing list mechanism, which would add Reply-To: mailing list to every mail it send out

2013-02-07 Thread Edison Su
...@widodh.nl; Animesh Chaturvedi; Alex Huang; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su; run...@gmail.com; dk...@apache.org; somikbeh...@vmware.com; David Nalley; htrippa...@schubergphilis.com; Chip Childers Subject: Re: [VOTE] Revert back to old mailing list mechanism, which would add Reply

RE: [MERGE][ACS41] javelin to master

2013-02-06 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Alex Huang Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 2:23 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Edison Su Subject: RE: [MERGE][ACS41] javelin to master Alex, How about unit tests for the Javelin code itself? Were any created? Are there any

RE: JSON Question

2013-02-06 Thread Edison Su
/dependency /dependencies repositories repository idjson-rpc/id urlhttp://json-rpc.googlecode.com/svn/mavenrepo/url /repository /repositories From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 1:48 PM To: Edison Su Cc: cloudstack-dev

RE: Storage Quality-of-Service Question

2013-02-05 Thread Edison Su
, if your storage box exports volume as a LUN. Just trying to get a feel for how this will work from both a programming and a user point of view. Thanks! On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Mike, sorry for the late to reply your email. I created a branch

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-629) Add the ability for other people to contribute to Storage

2013-02-05 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su updated CLOUDSTACK-629: - Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 Add the ability for other

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-732) Add back KVM snapshot support

2013-02-05 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13571838#comment-13571838 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-732: -- external snapshot doesn't work on RHEL

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-732) Add back KVM snapshot support

2013-02-05 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su updated CLOUDSTACK-732: - Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 Add back KVM snapshot support

RE: Storage Quality-of-Service Question

2013-02-05 Thread Edison Su
to everyone, then you may need to call storage box's api to grant access for specified end point. From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 2:52 PM To: Edison Su Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Storage Quality-of-Service

RE: JSON Question

2013-02-05 Thread Edison Su
You can add: dependency groupIdcom.google.code.gson/groupId artifactIdgson/artifactId version${cs.gson.version}/version /dependency Into your maven pom file, then use gson right away. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski

RE: Adding LXC support to Cloudstack

2013-02-01 Thread Edison Su
, but never try it by myself). If it's true, you can reuse KVM system vm templates for LXC. From: Phong Nguyen [mailto:pngu...@gilt.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:20 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Edison Su Subject: Re: Adding LXC support to Cloudstack Hi Chiradeep, I've

RE: Storage Quality-of-Service Question

2013-02-01 Thread Edison Su
Hi Mike, sorry for the late to reply your email. I created a branch storage_refactor to hack storage code, it has a simple framework to fit your requirements: zone-wide primary storage, and per data disk per LUN. There is even a maven project called: cloud-plugin-storage-volume-solidfire, you

RE: Adding LXC support to Cloudstack

2013-02-01 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: akaras...@gmail.com [mailto:akaras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alex Karasulu Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 2:24 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Adding LXC support to Cloudstack Hi Chiradeep, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:44 PM,

storage-refactor branch is created

2013-01-30 Thread Edison Su
Hi All, I created a new branch: storage-refactor, for storage refactor stuff, based on javelin. What it does: 1. Clean up storage and template manager. 2. Separate storage orchestration and provision. StorageManagerImpl/VolumeManagerImpl/TemplateManagerImpl, are mainly for

RE: [DISCUSS] Concerns on testing and improvements

2013-01-30 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:23 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Concerns on testing and improvements Prasanna: 2) More and more requests from contributors on how to

RE: [MERGE][ACS41] javelin to master

2013-01-28 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:08 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [MERGE][ACS41] javelin to master On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote: On Mon,

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-732) Add back KVM snapshot support

2013-01-24 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13562202#comment-13562202 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-732: -- Fang tried snapshot on RHEL 6.3, external

RE: new storage framework update

2013-01-18 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:51 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: new storage framework update Hi, On 01/16/2013 02:35 AM, Edison Su wrote: After a lengthy discussion(more than two

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1016) Not able to deploy VM.

2013-01-18 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su resolved CLOUDSTACK-1016. --- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in 189c20b6653498a8ee8c2e398c5f2e44ab4b840a on master branch

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-995) Not able to add the KVM host.

2013-01-18 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su closed CLOUDSTACK-995. Resolution: Fixed forget to cherry-pick commit 93a89b1591caea68e69cb1cea8a4f4ad8e8e0999

RE: new storage framework update

2013-01-18 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:26 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: new storage framework update On 01/18/2013 08:09 PM, Edison Su wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-995) Not able to add the KVM host.

2013-01-17 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su reassigned CLOUDSTACK-995: Assignee: edison su Not able to add the KVM host

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-995) Not able to add the KVM host.

2013-01-17 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13556475#comment-13556475 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-995: -- It's a regression introduced in commit

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-995) Not able to add the KVM host.

2013-01-17 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su resolved CLOUDSTACK-995. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in cbf37bd52328234d95d9b68e96e7c63420d5d1d3

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-989) marvin: jsonHelper deserialization results in unfilled attributes

2013-01-17 Thread edison su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13556526#comment-13556526 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-989: -- After api refactor, do we generalize API

RE: [DISCUSS] UI automation using Python/Selenium

2013-01-17 Thread Edison Su
Are you using headless browser? For automate UI test, selenium + PhantomJS[1] sounds interesting. [1]: https://github.com/detro/ghostdriver -Original Message- From: Parth Jagirdar [mailto:parth.jagir...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:37 PM To:

RE: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC

2013-01-17 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:57 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote

RE: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC

2013-01-17 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:07 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1

2013-01-17 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 2:44 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1 Hi Anthony, I tried storage xenmotion for two VMs

RE: [DISCUSS] UI automation using Python/Selenium

2013-01-17 Thread Edison Su
using Python/Selenium On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: Are you using headless browser? For automate UI test, selenium + PhantomJS[1] sounds interesting. [1]: https://github.com/detro/ghostdriver It does! I've had good experience using Selenium

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1

2013-01-17 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:35 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1 The main blocker for KVM is that you can't start the vm with

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1

2013-01-17 Thread Edison Su
Do you have document about how xenmotion works? I looked at http://blogs.citrix.com/2012/08/24/storage_xenmotion/ and http://www.citrix.com/wsdm/restServe/skb/attachments/RDY8035/LiveStorageMigrationwithXenServer.pdf, still not quite sure, what happened underneath. For example, what the

RE: Build SystemVM template

2013-01-17 Thread Edison Su
Veewee doesn't support to create xen pv vm: https://github.com/jedi4ever/veewee -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 6:14 PM To: CloudStack DeveloperList Subject: Re: Build SystemVM template +1 for veewee.

RE: Build SystemVM template

2013-01-17 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 6:47 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Build SystemVM template On 17-Jan-2013, at 6:10 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at

RE: mvn install failed on apache 4.0 branch: [ERROR] Could not find the selected project in the reactor: developer - [Help 1]

2013-01-16 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Ove Ewerlid [mailto:ove.ewer...@oracle.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:55 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Edison Su; Jessica Wang; Sheng Yang; Alex Huang Subject: Re: mvn install failed on apache 4.0 branch: [ERROR] Could not find

RE: CS MS Setup Question

2013-01-16 Thread Edison Su
Can you check /var/log/cloud/management/catalina.out? any exception? -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:53 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: CS MS Setup Question Just messed around

[RFC][Review] zone-wide primary storage support

2013-01-16 Thread Edison Su
I updated document about zone-wide primary storage support for 4.1(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Zone-wide+primary+storage+target): limit the scope for only KVM + zone-wide NFS storage. And I think Ceph should be doable also, as the changes I made are not related to a

RE: [MERGE] resizeVolume

2013-01-16 Thread Edison Su
Better to use git pull --rebase, which is cleaner than git merge. If you can squash your changes into small commits before push, that will be even better:) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:57 PM To:

RE: [CI] Continuous Integration with DevCloud

2013-01-15 Thread Edison Su
it becomes a central repo for our CI related work. Also, I've begun playing with devcloud-kvm so we can do the same tests using a similar appliance for our advanced zone tests. Comments, Suggestions and Contributions welcome Many thanks to Ahmad Emneina, Edison Su and Rohit Yadav

RE: CS MS Setup Question

2013-01-15 Thread Edison Su
Do you follow up the mysql setup? Need to execute: cloud-setup-database before start mgt server. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:54 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: CS MS Setup

RE: new storage framework update

2013-01-15 Thread Edison Su
, as it enforces the execution model, which I don't think it's necessary. BTW, John and I will discuss the matter tomorrow on Skype, if you want to join, please let me know. -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:19 PM

RE: new storage framework update

2013-01-15 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:09 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: new storage framework update On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: After a lengthy

RE: new storage framework update

2013-01-15 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Chris Sears [mailto:chris.x.se...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:01 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: new storage framework update On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: Yah, text

RE: [PROPOSAL] modify devcloud storage setup

2013-01-14 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 1:12 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] modify devcloud storage setup On 14-Jan-2013, at 11:51 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

RE: new storage framework update

2013-01-14 Thread Edison Su
, but not checked into javelin branch yet. Thanks, -John On Jan 9, 2013, at 8:10 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 8:51 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >