Hi Prachi,
I had a question regarding your commit for CLOUDSTACK-1604.
I noticed that the HypervisorVmPlannerSelector run level is currently 0.
This didn't appear to cause any problems until the fix for CLOUDSTACK-1604,
where a dependency on the 'configuration' database table was introduced.
Hi Min,
Looks like something possibly got lost in the merge? In a git pull from a
couple of hours ago I am seeing the following error on starting the
management server. Note the spelling of Hypervisor:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
com.cloud.template.HyervisorTemplateAdapter
The issue is
Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
Hi Anthony,
Adding you in CC in case you missed this message.
We're trying to understand in more detail your plan for Security Groups
support.
Thanks,
Dave.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Mills, Joseph j...@midokura.jp wrote:
*Hi Anthony,
Thanks
Hi Sheng,
I was looking into possible plugin combinations with the Virtual Router
network service provider, and I saw the restriction that VPN, LB, Firewall,
PortForwarding, and Static NAT on the VirtualRouter all require that the
VirtualRouter also be the Source NAT service provider. I am hoping
for VPC
offering. This has to be relaxed and createVpcOffering API should be used
to make it configurable.
~kishan
-Original Message-
From: Mills, Joseph [mailto:j...@midokura.jp]
Sent: Monday, 4 February 2013 2:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: VPC
I was looking at the FS for Security Group Isolation in Advanced Zone,
(CLOUDSTACK-737) and I noticed that:
Only one network service provider is supported in advanced SG enabled zone
- Virtual Router
Are there currently any plans to add pluggability support for Security
Groups in 4.2, and if so,
: Mills, Joseph [mailto:j...@midokura.jp]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 7:02 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Security Groups in Advanced Zone - Plugin Support
I was looking at the FS for Security Group Isolation in Advanced Zone,
(CLOUDSTACK-737) and I noticed
Subject: Re: VPC Functionality Not Pluggable
Looks like a shortcut. Definitely needs fixing
On 1/31/13 6:34 PM, Mills, Joseph j...@midokura.jp wrote:
I was looking through the code that handles creating VPCs and noticed
that it did not seem pluggable at the moment. For example
I was looking through the code that handles creating VPCs and noticed that
it did not seem pluggable at the moment. For example, there are a few
places where the assumption is made that the only possible Vpc element
provider is VPCVirtualRouter:
protected VpcProvider getVpcElement() {
/%3CB1DF26ECC0458748AC97CECE2DA98D41011D278DAB17@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite
.net%3E
On 16/01/13 11:21 AM, Mills, Joseph j...@midokura.jp wrote:
I was hoping someone could clarify something I am seeing in
NetworkManagerImpl.java
I see that whenever we prepare a nic, we call element.prepare, regardless
I was hoping someone could clarify something I am seeing in
NetworkManagerImpl.java
I see that whenever we prepare a nic, we call element.prepare, regardless
of the ReservationStrategy of the nic:
There is a database/code version mismatch that currently exists in the
master branch, and I was hoping someone might be able to provide some
insights.
The Database version is set to 4.0.0.2012-09-12T14:47:37Z (in
create-schema.sql).
However in the top level pom.xml, the code version is set to
do deploy database.
I'll make the required changes.
~kishan
-Original Message-
From: Mills, Joseph [mailto:j...@midokura.jp]
Sent: Friday, 21 December 2012 11:58 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Database/code version mismatch
There is a database/code version
13 matches
Mail list logo
