I would assume a 'modern' OS as well. Centos 6.2 / Ubuntu 12.04 / Windows
2008(and above).
Did you configure /etc/dhcpv6/dhcpc6.cnf with:
duid LL eth0
On 1/15/13 7:01 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan
]
Sent: vrijdag 11 januari 2013 19:50
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co
wrote:
From a quick glance at it's man
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
]
Sent: vrijdag 11 januari 2013 19:50
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
From a quick glance at it's man page
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co
wrote:
From a quick glance at it's man page, looks like it can do v4 and v6
leases at the same time...
You mean
...@stratosec.co]
Sent: vrijdag 11 januari 2013 19:50
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co
wrote:
From a quick glance
januari 2013 19:50
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co
wrote:
From a quick glance at it's man page, looks like
then.
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: vrijdag 11 januari 2013 19:50
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM
On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
From a quick glance at it's man page, looks like it can do v4 and v6
leases at the same time…
You mean dhcpd?
No, dnsmasq looked like it could...
I am
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org
wrote:
If there is
AM, Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com**
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:05 PM
To:
cloudstack-dev@incubator.**apache.orgcloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:05 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
Good comments - keep 'em coming!
On Jan 2, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote
...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:05 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
Good comments - keep 'em coming!
On Jan 2, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Technically this is a very sound
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org
wrote:
If there is no other opinions, I would begin with DHCPv6 in shared network
as first step.
Sure, one suggestion: I've been using ISC's dhcpd instead of dnsmasqas they
have some silly limitations (in test but I keep meaning
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org
wrote:
If there is no other opinions, I would begin with DHCPv6 in shared
network
as first step.
Sure, one suggestion: I've been using ISC's dhcpd instead
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org
wrote:
If there is no other opinions, I would begin with DHCPv6 in shared
network
as first
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
Good comments - keep 'em coming!
On Jan 2, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Technically this is a very sound idea, but scale needs to be
discussed.
Having static assignments
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:05 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
Good comments - keep 'em coming!
On Jan 2, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa
On 1/3/13 3:20 AM, Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:05 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
Good comments - keep
.
-Original Message-
From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 8:13 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
Hi,
I would like to update the existing JIRA ticket on IPv6 support and I have
also
added a requirements
Good comments - keep 'em coming!
On Jan 2, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Technically this is a very sound idea, but scale needs to be discussed.
Having static assignments in a database like we do for IPv4 could have
potential impact as the address
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
On 12/19/12 12:44 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Nalley
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
On 12/19/12 12:44 PM, Chip Childers
: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
On 12/19/12 12:44 PM
Hi,
I would like to update the existing JIRA ticket on IPv6 support and I have also
added a requirements page to track this feature. Please provide feedback on the
requirements.
JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-452
Requirements:
Personally I'd prefer to put all the info in one place - maybe copy the Jira
content into the wiki page.
Bringing dynamic routing protocols into the picture worries me, but I haven't
thought through the options, yet.
Will be happy to test as this progresses - my nets are v6 numbered already,
John, as you suggested, I have moved all of the requirements to the
requirements page.
Regards,
Manan Shah
On 12/19/12 11:29 AM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
Personally I'd prefer to put all the info in one place - maybe copy the
Jira content into the wiki page.
Bringing dynamic
Since it is a vast topic, I added subtasks in the Jira bug to make it more
manageable.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-452?subTaskView=all#issuet
able
On 12/19/12 11:40 AM, Manan Shah manan.s...@citrix.com wrote:
John, as you suggested, I have moved all of the requirements to
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Since it is a vast topic, I added subtasks in the Jira bug to make it more
manageable.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-452?subTaskView=all#issuet
able
This is indeed a massive feature - are
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Since it is a vast topic, I added subtasks in the Jira bug to make it more
manageable.
On 12/19/12 12:44 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Since it is a vast topic, I added subtasks in the Jira bug to make it
31 matches
Mail list logo
