...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:39 AM
To: David Nalley
Cc: Alex Huang; Pradeep Soundararajan; Wido den Hollander; cloudstack-
d...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:31:14PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8
: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 3:08 PM
To: Wido den Hollander
Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Chip Childers; David Nalley; Alex Huang; Pradeep
Soundararajan; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
Hm, this package.sh
[mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:31 PM
To: 'Marcus Sorensen'; Wido den Hollander
Cc: Chip Childers; David Nalley; Alex Huang; Pradeep Soundararajan;
cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
Hey Marcus,
I haven't updated
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 3:08 PM
To: Wido den Hollander
Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Chip Childers; David Nalley; Alex Huang; Pradeep
Soundararajan; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:31 PM
To: 'Marcus Sorensen'; Wido den Hollander
Cc: Chip Childers; David Nalley; Alex Huang; Pradeep Soundararajan;
cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
Hey Marcus,
I haven't updated package.sh in some time
; cloudstack-
d...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:31:14PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com
wrote:
Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
But Wido is kind enough
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:32:02PM -0500, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Hey guys,
Just a quick note before the weekend with a status update on RPM.
The management server package is pretty much done and installation
on a clean system works like a charm. This is actually tested every
few hours with
] Packaging in 4.1
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:31:14PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com
wrote:
Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for
users to take advantage
Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:39 AM
To: David Nalley
Cc: Alex Huang; Pradeep Soundararajan; Wido den Hollander; cloudstack-
d...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:31:14PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On 02/05/2013 06:33 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
I built the latest from the packaging branch. I think it is shaping up
nicely. Some thoughts:
How would you feel with postponing the config directory changes until 4.2?
While I
Soundararajan [mailto:pradeep.soundarara...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 11:00 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
Importance: High
Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :)
I am able to package rpm using
: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
Importance: High
Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :)
I am able to package rpm using packaging/centos63/package.sh after some
modification in the package.sh script since cloud.spec is looking for
'cloudstack' Name
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:30:04PM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :)
I am able to package rpm using packaging/centos63/package.sh after some
modification in the package.sh script since cloud.spec is looking for
'cloudstack'
Wido, how are we planning to setup the install for this new packaging concept?
Thanks,
Pradeep S
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 10:02 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging
]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 10:02 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On 02/06/2013 04:57 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:30:04PM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing
Cc: Wido den Hollander; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:05:00PM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
Wido, how are we planning to setup the install for this new packaging concept?
Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases
Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for users
to take advantage of. Our install guide explains how to build from
source, as well as how to use Wido's repos.
This was all true for 4.0.0-incubating, and I
On Wednesday, February 6, 2013, Chip Childers wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:30:04PM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :)
I am able to package rpm using packaging/centos63/package.sh after
some modification in the package.sh
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for users
to take advantage of. Our install guide explains how to build from
source, as well as how
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:31:14PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for users
to take advantage of. Our
Did bigtop infra provide a large choice of Linux distros ?
Better build packages for distro X under distro X.
2013/2/5 Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com:
I should probably pipe up with my suggestion of getting CloudStack into
Apache Bigtop here. =) http://bigtop.apache.org/ - it's mainly
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
...
So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - you require
: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com**] On Behalf
Of Rohit Yadav
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 5:14 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.**apache.orgcloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us
this done and integrated in the 4.1
branch.
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 7:13 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
Wanted to check when
[mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit
Yadav
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 5:14 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais
, February 03, 2013 5:14 PM
To:
cloudstack-dev@incubator.**apache.orgcloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3
, February 03, 2013 5:14 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.**apache.orgcloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013
in management
and agent to I thought to put those in common.
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 2:48 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On 02/04/2013 02:39 PM
: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 2:48 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On 02/04/2013 02:39 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
I'm on the last leg of my trip home from FOSDEM right now, I hope to
be able to put in some
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 2:48 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On 02/04/2013 02:39 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
I'm on the last leg of my trip home from
into common.
Wido
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 2:48 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On 02/04/2013 02:39 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
I'm on the last leg
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Henri Gomez henri.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice to see native packages for Cloudstack :
https://github.com/noaresare/incubator-cloudstack/tree/master/packaging
CentOS 6.3 and Debian.
Did there is plan to add Fedora, openSUSE, SLES or will it be done by
these
Well, some distributions are very stricts with binary contents in
packages, ie Debian, but not all.
BTW, there is no need to have RPM or DEB in distributions, as they
could be provided by Cloudstack as companion/extras packages
(yum/zypper, ppa).
For RPM distros, openSUSE Build System
I should probably pipe up with my suggestion of getting CloudStack into
Apache Bigtop here. =) http://bigtop.apache.org/ - it's mainly focused on
the Hadoop ecosystem currently, but at the very least it'd provide an
infrastructure, some consistent guidelines on builds/layout/etc.
A.
On Mon, Feb
Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and
s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts.
I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code, instead of a lengthy
email ;-) All packages will have a directory in /usr/share/cloudstack-%{name}
Why not
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and
s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts.
I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code, instead of a lengthy
email ;-) All packages will have a directory in
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and
s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts.
I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code,
On 02/03/2013 08:34 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Heya all,
As Devid already mentioned we met up at Build-A-Cloud-Day in Ghent with Wido,
Noa and a few other folks. During this day (with lots of nice talks) we had
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and
s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts.
I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code,
Thanks for bringing this back to the list Hugo! Hope you guys had a
good time at FOSDEM.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Heya all,
As Devid already mentioned we met up at Build-A-Cloud-Day in Ghent with Wido,
Noa and a few other folks.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
...
So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - you require 1.5, so in some ways it's
worth than clint (clint is in EPEL, but no new version of pygments in
EPEL/CentOS-Extras/CentOS-Plus)
I want people to use pip to install the cli because
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
...
So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - you require 1.5, so in some ways it's
worth than clint (clint is in EPEL, but no new version of pygments in
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
...
So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - you require 1.5, so in some ways it's
worth than clint
in
place till you are done with the new changes
Thanks
/sudha
-Original Message-
From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit
Yadav
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 5:14 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
Heya all,
As Devid already mentioned we met up at Build-A-Cloud-Day in Ghent with Wido,
Noa and a few other folks. During this day (with lots of nice talks) we had a
chance to sit down and discuss packaging. Something that Noa, Wido and myself
were planning to do for a long time. Some other
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Heya all,
As Devid already mentioned we met up at Build-A-Cloud-Day in Ghent with Wido,
Noa and a few other folks. During this day (with lots of nice talks) we had a
chance to sit down and discuss
47 matches
Mail list logo
