]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 10:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
I believe she gave me her card at the conference. Scott Sneddon from
vyatta introduced us, she said she would be asking the devs about details
on implementing their own network
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
I started contacting few people, I contacted CEO of Vyatta and another
person who now works for Citrix but was VP of Marketing for Vyatta. I did
both contacts via LinkedIn.
I do think LinkedIn will probably be ignored because
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CentOS System VM?
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Bryan Whitehead dri...@megahappy.net wrote:
having custom systemvm's seems ideal. A network offering can be paired
with a systemVM (or something along those lines).
Giving the community the ability to create
: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 2:07 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CentOS System VM?
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Bryan Whitehead dri...@megahappy.net
wrote:
having custom systemvm's seems ideal. A network
support, and training.
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 10:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
I believe she gave me her card at the conference. Scott Sneddon from
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 11:19 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
I started contacting few people, I contacted CEO of Vyatta and another
person who now works
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
I started contacting few people, I contacted CEO of Vyatta and another
person who now works for Citrix but was VP of Marketing for Vyatta. I did
both contacts via LinkedIn.
I do think LinkedIn will probably be ignored because
I guess we can try creating alternative system offering :)
-Original Message-
From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 3:17 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CentOS System VM?
I'm also interested in swapping out ha_proxy
: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 11:25 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
I guess we can try creating alternative system offering :)
-Original Message-
From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca]
Sent
.
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 8:43 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
Vyatta provides great L3-L4 support with good number of features and interface.
If there is a doc on how to create
Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 8:43 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
Vyatta provides great L3-L4 support with good number of features and
interface.
If there is a doc on how to create
.
-Original Message-
From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 12:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CentOS System VM?
Interesting, I spoke with Brocade yesterday and the also feel their Vyatta
acquisition is a good gap
[mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 11:19 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
I started contacting few people, I contacted CEO of Vyatta and another
person who now works for Citrix but was VP of Marketing for Vyatta. I did
both contacts via
with at least one influencer at
Brocade/Vyatta.
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 11:19 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
I started contacting few people, I contacted CEO of Vyatta
Has anyone looked into building a system VM that runs on a CentOS distro?
I guess you could, but why?
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 1:10 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: CentOS System VM?
Has anyone looked into building a system VM that runs on a CentOS distro?
CentOS has better support on Hyper-V
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: 05 December 2012 6:13 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
I guess you could, but why?
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty
: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 10:16 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System VM?
CentOS has better support on Hyper-V
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: 05 December 2012 6:13 PM
To: cloudstack-dev
I'm very interested in this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 5, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote:
Has anyone looked into building a system VM that runs on a CentOS distro?
TBH Hyper-V synthetic drivers(modules) is supported in the mainline kernel.
So the argument that CentOS 6.x has better support is moot.
This assumes that the kernel version on the SSVM is at least 2.6.32. I ran
Ubuntu Server 11.x and Centos 6.x on Hyper-V natively and just needed to
load the
The sooner we decouple the systemVMs and allow preference in OS, and user
building, we will be better off.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 5, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Jason Davis scr...@gmail.com wrote:
TBH Hyper-V synthetic drivers(modules) is supported in the mainline kernel.
So the argument that
The current system vm is getting long in the tooth. I (or Rohit Yadav)
will looking into building a wheezy-based systemvm that includes hyper-v
drivers.
Hopefully network throughput should be better as well when used with
multiple cores.
On 12/5/12 10:38 AM, Jason Davis scr...@gmail.com wrote:
Granted both debian wheezy and centos/rhel 6, run the same major kernel version
2.6.32 i386 and hopefully same glibc library (need to confirm) - it should be
really easy to port the code over without needing to recompile anything. I
don't believe we do anything overly complex - within
23 matches
Mail list logo
