Thanks for the review. Please find the comments inline. In this spec I
tried to captures what I think will be high level design of this feature.
Specifics on the finer implementation details will be clear as I progress
with development. I will update the spec when feature in decent shape.
On
To: CloudStack DeveloperList
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) FS Design Document
Thanks. Can you add the actual API parameters? Otherwise, LGTM.
On 1/15/13 3:55 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
I have update the FS [1] as per the review comments. Changes done
Thanks. Can you add the actual API parameters? Otherwise, LGTM.
On 1/15/13 3:55 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
I have update the FS [1] as per the review comments. Changes done are
included in document history section.
I would like to seek comments on one change added in FS. In
I have update the FS [1] as per the review comments. Changes done are
included in document history section.
I would like to seek comments on one change added in FS. In CloudStak, at
present there are no operations that require orchestration across zones.
GSLB and EIP across zones [2] are two
On 11/01/13 2:55 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
Thanks for the detailed and enlightening write-up*.
I feel that the GSLB service is not a NetworkElement.
NetworkElements are those that participate in the L2/L3 orchestration of
VMs.
GSLB providers do not do this.
Thanks
Thanks for the detailed and enlightening write-up*.
I feel that the GSLB service is not a NetworkElement.
NetworkElements are those that participate in the L2/L3 orchestration of
VMs.
GSLB providers do not do this.
It does not even participate in the existing Loadbalancer workflow.
In fact I
