storage box?
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 9:28 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Edison Su
Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions
Hey Edison,
Thanks for that info.
When grantAccess and revokeAccess are invoked, do I have
:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, March 10, 2013 9:28 PM
*To:* cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
*Cc:* Edison Su
*Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions
** **
Hey Edison,
** **
Thanks for that info.
** **
When grantAccess
is used in your storage box?
** **
*From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, March 10, 2013 9:28 PM
*To:* cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
*Cc:* Edison Su
*Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions
** **
Hey Edison,
** **
Thanks
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions
Hi,
I'm working on implementing a storage plug-in for CS 4.2.
I'm looking at the following Wiki page for guidance, but have some
questions:
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/storage-subsystem-20
edison...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 9:22 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions
Hi,
I'm working on implementing a storage plug
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 9:22 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions
Hi,
I'm working on implementing a storage plug-in for CS 4.2.
I'm looking
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 9:22 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions
Hi,
I'm working on implementing a storage plug-in for CS 4.2.
I'm
Thanks, Marcus
When Edison sees this e-mail chain, he will be able to fill in extra
details.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Generally the targets I've worked with support different levels of
access control, so you may have a high level block where
On a related note, it looks like the scope of Primary Storage has changed
in 4.2. What are the benefits of this scoping feature? For example, does
it help mainly if you want to migrate a VM from one cluster to another?
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
Hi,
I'm working on implementing a storage plug-in for CS 4.2.
I'm looking at the following Wiki page for guidance, but have some
questions:
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/storage-subsystem-20.html
One interface that needs to be implemented is PrimaryDataStoreDriver. I'm
not sure what is
On revoke/grant access, If we're talking about individual volumes
being equal to a data/root disk, it's wise to adjust ACLs to only
allow access to the host that is currently wanting to run the VM/disk.
This way, cloudstack is authoritative in what's accessing the lun, and
you don't have to run a
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
On revoke/grant access, If we're talking about individual volumes
being equal to a data/root disk, it's wise to adjust ACLs to only
allow access to the host that is currently wanting to run the VM/disk.
This way,
Interesting, Marcus...thanks for the comments.
Yeah, the way it works on our SAN is a given volume is either accessible
via CHAP credentials or - if CHAP is not being used - a set of IQNs is
maintained and any initiator with a proper IQN can access the volume (we
depend on client-side software to
Generally the targets I've worked with support different levels of
access control, so you may have a high level block where you can't
even see the target unless you come from the right IP (ACL/firewall),
then you've got something like CHAP, and then maybe the target
supports persistent
14 matches
Mail list logo
