The 'host' table has a column 'hypervisor_version' but that doesn't get filled
(tried with XS and Vmware). For Vmware the column 'version' is populated with
HV version whereas in case of XS it has CS version appended with some timestamp.
There is another table 'host_details'. For XS saw that
Storing it in host_details table with the product_version name should be
fine. For XS, that is where it is kept and it'll make sure it is consistent for
other hypervisors too.
Just for my understanding, what is the requirement for which you now need to
keep the Vmware host version details?
Hello,
Calling that API:
http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/api/apidocs-4.0.0/domain_admin/listEvents.html
the response created value reports the server timezone, not the user
timezone.
Is that normal?
Thanks.
Regards.
--
Antonio Petrox Petrocelli
Supernova s.r.l.
Via
I've setup a simple job on the jenkins instance [1] that will monitor the
git repo for commits and run basic tests within devcloud to ensure
essential functionality isn't broken. Once stabilized and trustworthy
in its reporting I'll move it to builds.a.o post permission from
#asfinfra.
I've put
Hugo Trippaers created CLOUDSTACK-977:
-
Summary: Document how to use openvswitch with KVM hypervisors
Key: CLOUDSTACK-977
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-977
Project:
+1 (binding)
Nice!!
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 10 jan. 2013 om 10:42 heeft Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com het
volgende geschreven:
+1(binding). Good to see automated tests are getting committed. Expecting
more automated tests.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien
Yes it can be stored in host_details table but then given that all hosts in a
cluster have same version the data would get duplicated. That's why storing it
in cluster or cluster_details table would be better, would like to know if
there can be any issues with this.
Needed it to do some
I still have no clue what is causing this. One thing I suspect is that it might
be related to the version of the java compiler used. Not all 1.6 versions are
equal and 1.6.0_15 is quite old, they did make some changes to generics
somewhere in the _2x versions.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 14
On 14/01/13 23:10, David Nalley wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Anshul Gangwar
anshul.gang...@citrix.com wrote:
On 08/01/13 07:27, David Nalley wrote:
I'll be happy to figure out how this gets done. -
Sateesh is working on fixing it. Will provide an update.
Thanks,
Ram
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: 15 January 2013 04:27
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Subject: RE: [ACS401] Bump:
On 01/15/2013 10:44 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
I still have no clue what is causing this. One thing I suspect is that it might
be related to the version of the java compiler used. Not all 1.6 versions are
equal and 1.6.0_15 is quite old, they did make some changes to generics
somewhere in the
On 15/01/13 12:03 PM, Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.com wrote:
My comments inline..
On 14/01/13 22:52, Alex Huang wrote:
Anshul,
I had assumed that if you were doing this based on Murali's event
framework, it would not be architected on an adapter in the alert
manager but as a
Joe
Great work! Can I suggest you also notify cloudstack-users when this is posted
as there are a lot of folk on that list who would appreciate an overview of
what is going on in the dev community.
Regards
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: 14
Hi,
Here is an updated PRD link for this feature:
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/private-host-cluster-pod.html
I am updating the FS based on the updated PRD, will be sharing it soon.
Saurav,
Please see comments inline..
Thanks
Deepti
-Original Message-
From: Saurav Lahiri
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/
---
(Updated Jan. 15, 2013, 11:06 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/
---
(Updated Jan. 15, 2013, 11:06 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare resolved CLOUDSTACK-718.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
This feature is merged in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/
---
(Updated Jan. 15, 2013, 11:30 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13553690#comment-13553690
]
Hari Kannan commented on CLOUDSTACK-718:
Sorry, I'm traveling until Friday,
I have update the FS [1] as per the review comments. Changes done are
included in document history section.
I would like to seek comments on one change added in FS. In CloudStak, at
present there are no operations that require orchestration across zones.
GSLB and EIP across zones [2] are two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare updated CLOUDSTACK-681:
-
Description:
Currently in CloudStack architecture, domains can have dedicated zones
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/
---
(Updated Jan. 15, 2013, 12:34 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare reopened CLOUDSTACK-718:
--
trying to duplicate it to 681 properly
VMs on hardware dedicated to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare resolved CLOUDSTACK-718.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicating it to CLOUDSTACK-681
VMs on
Please find the updated FS in below link.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Multiple+IP+address+per+NIC
I want to discuss the MIPN case for shared networks.
I observed VM specific security groups iptables rules in basic zone, in which
we are allowing egress traffic from
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:25:51PM -0500, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I've now got a config for regular devcloud in
tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg, this works for me to deploy a fully
working advanced network zone, except for the traffic labels. If I go in
and manually fix the traffic labels
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Antonio Petrocelli
a.petroce...@netsons.com wrote:
Hello,
Calling that API:
http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/api/apidocs-4.0.0/domain_admin/listEvents.html
the response created value reports the server timezone, not the user
timezone.
Is that
Hi Sebastien:
Did you see any warning message, such as Detecting a new state
but couldn't find a old state so adding it to the changes: r-4-VM, in
debug mode?
I just want to make sure the issue happens in recent commits. If so, there
is a workaround which is to restart the MS and each
Hi everyone,
This is to remind you of a european Build a Cloud Day (BACD) event taking place
February 1st in Ghent, Belgium prior to FOSDEM.
We almost have a complete schedule, with Hugo talking about SDN, Wido talking
Ceph, Noa talking about CloudStack use at Spotify, Brian talking about
Rajesh Battala created CLOUDSTACK-979:
-
Summary: Error: Unable to plug service while listing NetScaler
Loadbalance devices.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-979
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-979
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to
accept a donation from Citrix of a set of marvin automated tests
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 08:00:55PM +0530, Chip Childers wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to
The next step is for someone in Citrix to sign an SGA for the
material. David, you mentioned that you could take care of this?
This is a WIP - I'll update you when I know more.
--David
Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-980:
-
Summary: marvin integration lib: make the library consistent with
API
Key: CLOUDSTACK-980
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-980
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13553895#comment-13553895
]
Rajesh Battala commented on CLOUDSTACK-978:
---
Pranav fixed the issue in my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajesh Battala reassigned CLOUDSTACK-978:
-
Assignee: Pranav Saxena
TypeError: instance.displayname is undefined
Hello,
thanks for reply...
So why i can set timezone to user? In that mode i have to manage myself
timezone? Why that is not autocalculate inside API reply?
Regards.
Il 15/01/2013 15:05, David Nalley ha scritto:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Antonio Petrocelli
a.petroce...@netsons.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pranav Saxena resolved CLOUDSTACK-978.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
TypeError: instance.displayname
Sorry. I hit enter too fast. The exception connection to CFE exceeded is
seen whenever there are too many tcp connections open to NetScaler management
plane. Just check if you are using a stable build. If you come across this
issue over a stable build of NetScaler with only CS managing the
Please find the FS for the feature at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS-+IP+Range+Reservation+within+a+Network
Few of the points I want to bring for discussion:
1) Extending the functionality to shared network
Should shared guest networks also allow for IP
Anthony Xu created CLOUDSTACK-982:
-
Summary: multiple VLAN/multiple subnets doesn't work
Key: CLOUDSTACK-982
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-982
Project: CloudStack
Thanks Ram for the info.
I had gone through this doc to figure out the issue
Figured out this issue is specific to NS VPX(10 version) issue.
Issue is fixed now by killing the sessions in the VPX.
This doc explains the issue and solution
http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX135228
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-705:
--
Description:
Requirements described at:
Thanks for bringing this up,
For security group, we may need to handle following things,
As you mentioned,
Anti-spoofing rules need to be updated, when secondary IP is
associate/dissociate to NIC.
And
Security group rule can base on cidr and it can base on account/security group,
For example a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-705:
--
Description:
Requirements described at:
Rajesh,
While this is not helping your issue - would you define the permissions you
used to join Netscaler VPX to CS?
I could not get past the permission issue (I don't have an admin access).
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: 08 January 2013 01:02
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: FS for host updates notifications
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Bumping this thread.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-858:
Description:
- Upload test plan/Test cases done on feature branch/ offline
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti closed CLOUDSTACK-456.
---
No QA required - closing this improvement
License tag in SPEC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti closed CLOUDSTACK-421.
---
No doc and QA needed - closing it
Open up the integration api port
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-918:
Assignee: sadhu suresh
QA - Security Group isolation in Advaned zone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-826:
Assignee: Jessica Wang (was: Sudha Ponnaganti)
QA: Testing of Advanced
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554079#comment-13554079
]
Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-826:
-
Kiran Koneti will pick up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Min Chen updated CLOUDSTACK-618:
Description:
We should limit number of APIs placed per second for one account to avoid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554086#comment-13554086
]
Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-926:
-
No specific QA required.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Min Chen updated CLOUDSTACK-527:
Description:
Please see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554088#comment-13554088
]
Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-933:
-
clarification needed from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-718:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
VMs on hardware dedicated to a specific
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554090#comment-13554090
]
Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-718:
-
Removed this as part of 4.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti closed CLOUDSTACK-718.
---
VMs on hardware dedicated to a specific account
You can introduce your own dedicate apis to dedicate pods clusters and host
instead of jam them into update apis.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Deepti Dohare
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 9:48 PM
To: Alex Huang
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Dedicate Pods, Clusters,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554099#comment-13554099
]
Chip Childers commented on CLOUDSTACK-933:
--
This is a unit test, run by
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
You can introduce your own dedicate apis to dedicate pods clusters and host
instead of jam them into update apis.
--Alex
+1
-Original Message-
From: Deepti Dohare
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 9:48 PM
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554104#comment-13554104
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-527:
---
Min, we were planning
This is so cool. Thanks Joe for doing this, it saved our day.
-min
On 1/14/13 1:54 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Posted here:
https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/apache_cloudstack_weekly_news_14
The wiki page for news items for next week's issue is here, please edit
boldly!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554115#comment-13554115
]
Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-527:
-
Prasanna, that will be a good way to test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Huang updated CLOUDSTACK-527:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: Prasanna, that will be a good way to test to compare with
+1!
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:37 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache CloudStack Weekly News posted
This is so cool. Thanks Joe for doing this, it saved our day.
-min
On 1/14/13 1:54 PM,
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 15, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
+1!
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:37 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache CloudStack
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to build up Cloudstack from the master branch with the
Non-opensource libraries (nonoss)... Everything's working fine until I
enable the Zone and spin up the console and the SSVM... Basically, The
Xenserver return an exception when CS is trying to copy the SSVM
hey Marc-Andre,
Did you put vhd-util on your xenserver? We can't distribute it, but you do
need it to calculate the vhd size. I don't have the link here but it should be
somewhere on the wiki.
Cheers,
Hugo
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 15 jan. 2013 om 19:56 heeft Marc-Andre Jutras
Thanks for the detailed write-up
On 1/14/13 3:47 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@citrix.com wrote:
Let me start by giving some background on the existing design and
implementation and later argue how we can make admin's life easier. Sorry
for the long email, I don't want people to miss anything I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-880:
Assignee: Sowmya Krishnan
QA API request throttling feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti closed CLOUDSTACK-783.
---
XS alert hotfix notification
-
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
To keep the community posted on status on IP clearance. I have followed up
with the contributors of the issues mentioned, as soon as the code is posted
publicly, we will start the IP clearance review
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554276#comment-13554276
]
Noa Resare commented on CLOUDSTACK-933:
---
I was not aware that there is more than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angeline shen reassigned CLOUDSTACK-918:
Assignee: angeline shen (was: sadhu suresh)
QA - Security Group
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angeline shen updated CLOUDSTACK-918:
-
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/QA/Advance+zone+Security+Group+Enabled
Marcus,
Can you please add a license header to
tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced_internal-mgt.cfg?
It's causing build errors on builds.a.o. The RAT license check report
showing the issue is here:
https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-rat-master/479/artifact/target/rat.txt
-chip
--
Murali
Did you revert CLOUDSTACK-312 265? If not please do so at the earliest. Also
please provide update on the code posting for community review as we have to
get started on IP clearance quickly.
Thanks
Animesh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-919:
Assignee: angeline shen
QA for UI changes done for Security group
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13554297#comment-13554297
]
Sangeetha Hariharan commented on CLOUDSTACK-241:
Following are the
Sudha Ponnaganti created CLOUDSTACK-984:
---
Summary: QA: Egress firewall rules
Key: CLOUDSTACK-984
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-984
Project: CloudStack
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-984:
Summary: QA: Egress firewall rules for guest network (was: QA: Egress
Thanks Hugo, vhd-util was missing // my problem...
for the record...
download vhd-util from :
http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util
Copy vhd-util to this location in the source tree:
scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vhd-util
re-compile everything and re-add the xen server
In that case, why not just use snmplog4jappender?
http://code.google.com/p/log4j-snmp-trap-appender/
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:36 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss]
Yes, I just got bitten by this as well. I'm hoping Alex can comment on the
commit because I'm not super familiar with this or what was being fixed by
the change to an OR. It used to be that they keys would generate if you
were running as user 'cloud' OR the developer configuration flag was set.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Marcus Sorensen
mar...@betterservers.com wrote:
Sure, but the original devcloud.cfg doesn't have it either. Is it on an
exclude list? Should it be?
You're right. I think I added it to the exclude list, because I
wasn't sure if comments would work in the file.
I ran into the same problem as well, but I didn't do the check where it came
from. I just fixed it in the openvswitch branch and continued working.
I think it's a plain and simple mistake.
Cheers,
Hugo
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 15 jan. 2013 om 22:08 heeft Marcus Sorensen
Ok, I'm going to put it back for now, and if there's an issue that can't be
resolved some other way then we can address it further. I'm fairly
confident that it was ok previously since 4.0 seems to deploy fine. I just
didn't want to get into a commit war where someone keeps changing it back
I saw your commit, and just fixed pom.xml. Thanks Marcus!
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Marcus Sorensen
mar...@betterservers.com wrote:
Sure, but the original devcloud.cfg doesn't have it either. Is it on an
My mistake there. Thanks Marcus for reverting it and David for pointing it out.
The windows developer deployment fails because of this check and I changed it
to make it work for a training session but checked it in by mistake when I
checked in the sample plugin code.
Reverting will mean
Hari
please provide update on the code posting for community review as we have to
get started on IP clearance quickly.
Thanks
Animesh
Jayapal
Please provide update on the code posting for community review as we have to
get started on IP clearance quickly.
Thanks
Animesh
Sheng
Please provide update on the code posting for community review as we have to
get started on IP clearance soon.
Thanks
Animesh
Anthony
Please provide update on the code posting for community review as we have to
get started on IP clearance quickly.
Thanks
Animesh
Chip Childers commented on CLOUDSTACK-737:
--
As of right now, this feature is blocked due to IP ownership
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.comwrote:
Taking
dependency on the event framework would mean that this feature will
require a MOM broker for no additional benefit at least in this context of
proposal.
Isn't the plan to eventually move many
Folks
Frank has posted CS - 774 code for IP Clearance review at
http://people.apache.org/~frankzhang/ . Citrix would like to donate this code
to Apache CloudStack.
Dave, Chip can you outline the formal process for IP clearance? Do we call out
for VOTE on its inclusion right away or wait for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1355#comment-1355
]
Sateesh Chodapuneedi commented on CLOUDSTACK-615:
-
Dependency scope
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Folks
Frank has posted CS - 774 code for IP Clearance review at
http://people.apache.org/~frankzhang/ . Citrix would like to donate this code
to Apache CloudStack.
Dave, Chip can you outline the
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
