Yeah, that would be good. Currently I have a virtual machine on my desktop
that is a full blown cloudstack install. Agent, mgt server,
primary/secondary storage. It works well for me, I can develop on it and
launch nested VMs with decent performance. It takes about two minutes to
build and
for the information!
I see. Packaging is required now.
I am the same environment as you.
2012/11/13 Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com:
Yeah, that would be good. Currently I have a virtual machine on my
desktop
that is a full blown cloudstack install. Agent, mgt server,
primary/secondary
Keep in mind that the version numbers on the Cent 6.3 packages mean
nothing. They are far ahead and patched beyond what they say. For example
qemu-kvm version is in reality built off of 1.0 I will look and see if the
stock ones are built with rbd.
On Nov 12, 2012 10:33 PM, Alex Jiang
of time.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Keep in mind that the version numbers on the Cent 6.3 packages mean
nothing. They are far ahead and patched beyond what they say. For example
qemu-kvm version is in reality built off of 1.0 I will look and see
, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7099/
Review request for cloudstack.
By Marcus Sorensen.
*Updated Oct. 5, 2012, 11:07 p.m.*
Changes
adjusted size input to be more
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-226
It looks like this was fixed (11fe086adab8e790018343252ed08aac9a27b1c6) by
making sure that a particular vlan range can only exist on one physical
network. Is there any technical reason for this? It looks like the fix
worked around the unique
This is a tiny thing, but I got tired of typing 'ssh -i
/root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922 root@169.254.0.10' whenever I wanted to
look at a systemvm. This happens a lot for me during development, and some
of our admins have to look it up in the docs on the odd occasion when they
need it. I just
One question, are the schema-XtoX.sql files generated after/around code
freeze from the difference in the old and current schema files, or are they
manually created as schema changes occur?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
That's fine, I can change
CLOUDSTACK-516
CLOUDSTACK-517
possibly
CLOUDSTACK-426
... I consider that one a bug (Static NAT not working for KVM/VPC), but it
could also be considered as adding a feature so I'll leave it up to the
powers that be.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:14 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon,
That looks right to me, at least to fix the issue as you described. How
often does the issue occur? I have had issues with flakiness of the
password server in the past but it has been a few months since I have seen
an issue, last one was well before I started looking at code.
If it fixes your
I believe the way its done now is handled by which OS option you choose. If
you wanted to make the XML persistent it would need to reside on all hosts.
Perhaps you can request an enhancement for user defined OS settings with
KVM that allows you to save a small set of parameters like caching, nic
I don't believe there is a 4.0-specific system VM template. At least the
current 4.0 instructions still say to download the acton template from feb
2012.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Tamas Monos tam...@veber.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
As I'm stuck with the 3.0.2-4.0 upgrade I've decided to drop
Office
+44(0)2034687000
Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522
7057
http://www.veber.co.uk
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost
Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost
-Original Message-
From: Marcus
I don't have a vsphere environment, but it sounds a bit like an ARP issue,
where perhaps the bridge on the VMware host is filtering broadcast or
something. Maybe a workaround could be added to the system VM to make sure
things are more robust, but it sounds like something in your network is
If that's the case, I'd like to see commit
4da02c097176e3ccc41e6112f67e1edad8e528b9 on master pushed as well
(CLOUDSTACK-460/CLOUDSTACK-577). It's just a dependency added to the debs
to fix an issue that seems to be tripping many people up.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Joe Brockmeier
I think it may have something to do with your DNS. I've noticed that it
drops routes in for my DNS servers, forcing them to use the management
network. So in this case perhaps you have your DNS configured as 10.0.3.2,
so it forces that to use eth1... just a guess. If thats the issue (or
something
Yes, see your cmdline. internaldns1=10.0.3.2, so it is forcing the use of
management network to route to 10.0.3.2 for DNS. that's where the route is
coming from. you will want to use something on your management net for
internal DNS, or something other than that router.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at
Anyone know why we do a convert from qcow2 to qcow2 when we crete a volume
or template? It seems slower than file copy, and it strips valuable
compression which could speed up deployments significantly. Our qcow2
templates are compressed to about 1/3 size of uncompressed, and since the
compression
, at 12:17 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know why we do a convert from qcow2 to qcow2 when we crete a
volume
or template? It seems slower than file copy, and it strips valuable
compression which could speed up deployments significantly. Our qcow2
templates
CloudStack such that the guest network NIC on the VM
will be connected to correct physical NIC?
Thanks for your help,
-John
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-590
On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, see your cmdline. internaldns1
in the layers beneath it. If CloudStack simply did as it was told, it
would fail as expected in a typical networking environment while preserving
the flexibility of configuration expected by a network engineer.
Thanks,
-John
On Dec 6, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
There already is backing qcow2 support. But when cloudstack moves the
template from secondary to primary storage to use as a backing file for all
of your VMs, it does a convert. That strips any snapshots or compression
that an uploader may have been counting on, and is overall slower than just
Just curious, hadn't thought about this before but it seems that at least
on KVM (probably similar in Xen and VMware too?), there are two separate
issues with storage in the existing code. First, adding a new storage type
is a matter of adding in a new 'else if' or something in a bunch of
primary storage type I happen to be acting upon.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
** **
** **
*From:* Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2012 2:06 PM
*To:* Edison Su
*Cc:* cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
** **
** **
*From:* Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2012 3:37 PM
*To:* Edison Su
*Cc:* cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: pluggable storage implementation
** **
Ok, that makes sense
== null) {
adaptor = storageMapper.get(“libvirt”);
}
return adaptor;
}
*From:* Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2012 4:25 PM
*To:* Edison Su
*Cc:* cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
*Subject:* Re
I believe she gave me her card at the conference. Scott Sneddon from vyatta
introduced us, she said she would be asking the devs about details on
implementing their own network service.
When I was talking with Scott about it a few months back there really
wasn't a clear idea of what's in it for
Welcome back. Hopefully the vacation was good enough that you're looking
forward to going back to work.
On Dec 10, 2012 7:30 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
Hi all,
It's my last day on Bali and I'm flying back home in about 12 hours. After
the long 17 hour flight I'll be back in
as well as a graphical user interface, access to
Vyatta's RESTful API's, Serial Support, TACACS+, Config Sync, System Image
Cloning, software updates, 24x7 phone and email technical support, and
training.
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com
have any suggestions?
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, so you do in fact want to change all of the calls in
LibvirtComputingResource to pass storage adaptor type instead of defaulting
to libvirt. That's what I was after.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012
There are also some commands that don't pass StorageFilerTO, but just a
uuid of a storage pool (primaryStoragePoolNameLabel), I'm assuming those
will need to be reworked to pass either a type or the whole StorageFilerTO?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote
to be passed, so as
not to break or have to rework the other hypervisor types?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
There are also some commands that don't pass StorageFilerTO, but just a
uuid of a storage pool (primaryStoragePoolNameLabel), I'm assuming those
it in a review request so you can see all of the changes.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Here's a list according to what's in LibvirtComputingResource of things
that would need to either pass a pool type or a StorageFilerTO:
CreateVolumeFromSnapshotCommand
iso
attach iso
detach iso
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
This is pretty important. Anyone should be able to roll their own, rather
than relying on a single potentially out-of-date image. It seems like it
would be pretty simple and straightforward on the face of it, however many
of the scripts have been written specifically for Debian. I'd honestly be
I agree, I'm definitely not on the side of supporting CentOS, Arch, or
whatever version of system VM an admin wants, it would be a nightmare for
the people who maintain the systemvm scripts. That's what I was attempting
to say. But I do think that it should be documented well enough that people
I just closed CLOUDSTACK-577 (now that I have access to!)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Hey all,
We still have four issues remaining on 4.0.1 before I call for a vote,
please take a look:
http://is.gd/jSV25m
We have one (CLOUDSTACK-595) that has
data disk
create snapshot
create template
attach datadisk to VM
detach datadisk from VM
delete datadisk
delete template
delete snapshot
stop vm
delete vm
register iso
attach iso
detach iso
Thanks,
Marcus Sorensen
I think this is a great discussion to have, but I think it would help if
there were specific examples you could share so that we all have a better
understanding. For example, I think I'm guilty of this in some respects,
but I'm not sure if this is what you're talking about. Let me post one of
my
so I thought I'd offer up these
experiences.
On Dec 14, 2012 4:07 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:16:58PM -0700, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
3. If it's generic enough that it makes sense for upstream CloudStack
(and
believe me anything we can push back we want
I was planning on looking at the same. With KVM, it requires that you
launch the vm with a max number and a current number. Then you can increase
up to max.
I agree that it will be important to migrate before scaling if necessary.
The scenario would likely be common and make the feature less
You can scale down memory in KVM, but not CPU without a reboot. I'd like to
see this implemented as the ability to jump between service offerings
without reboot, and perhaps have a custom service offering that allows for
any custom number to be put in. That way people who utilize cloudstack can
The FS looks good and addresses the things I'd want it to (scaling should
be limited to within cluster, use offerings).
As you mention, there's a real problem surrounding no support for scaling
down CPU, and it's just as much a problem with the guests as it is with
hvms at the moment, it seems.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:40 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
(comments inline)
On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Hi, Alex!
I've talked to various developers on the challenges they face in
participating in the community and these
That's what I was going to say... start with feature parity on the default
VPC/router. Conspicuously missing from Vyatta's functionality, however, is
the load balancing (virtual IP redirecting to many servers). I'm sure
someone could put haproxy into the image, however.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at
: [DISCUSS] Scaling up CPU and RAM for running VMs
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com
wrote:
See inline
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:35 PM
To: cloudstack-dev
of the project and understanding who to get buyoff from
for a new feature.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Dec 15, 2012, at 12:42 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
Oh, if it's not already obvious, we're onboard for collaborating on this
feature and can help implement the KVM hypervisor portions. :-)
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.comwrote:
See
Thanks. I'm trying to picture how this will change the existing code. I
think it is something i will need a real example to understand. Currently
we pass a storageFilerTO and/or volumeTO from the serverto the agent, and
the agent does all of the work. Do we still need things like
Marcus
Sorensen
CLOUDSTACK-427 Change hardcoded step number references to dynamic
links Jessica Tomechak
CLOUDSTACK-455 Many files listed twice in the spec file David Nalley Major
New Feature:
CLOUDSTACK-619 CloudStack Marketplace Jie Feng Major
***
Status Values
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Prasanna Santhanam
prasanna.santha...@citrix.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 10:29:45AM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
Hi all,
We've had some good discussions on the proposed bylaws over the last
couple of weeks [1], so I'd like to move
constraint?
~kishan
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 3 January 2013 11:59 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Actions Required: Getting organized for 4.1.0
Anyone willing to help me out with 686
Clusters still work to segment which compute the VMs run on, and can do
tags or other networking related segmentation.
I can understand this for something like RBD, you could have all of your
clusters backed by the same Ceph cluster. But even then I think it makes
more sense to define primary
Sure, that makes sense, Alex. If someone wants to create a zone-wide
primary storage for data volumes, then that data volume can be migrated
between VMs in separate clusters.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Clusters still work to segment which compute
re:disk offering, I imagine this working as follows:
admin adds a primary storage 'Z' that is zone-wide, gives it tag 'X'
admin creates disk offering 'Y' with tag 'X'
data disks requested via disk offering 'Y' will end up on primary storage
'Z'
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Hari Kannan
How do you recover? Or do you just abandon those VMS?
On Jan 3, 2013 6:35 PM, Andrew Bayer (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13543509#comment-13543509]
You provide the IP you want, the hostname you want, and template you want
to deploy from when you call deployVirtualMachine. The previous vm needs to
be fully expunged though, or the IP won't be available.
On Jan 4, 2013 4:25 PM, Trevor Francis trevor.fran...@tgrahamcapital.com
wrote:
Is there a
I'm worried that a few things we're working on against master will break
and I'll have to figure out the code that's in javelin in order to merge my
stuff (as opposed to having more help of other people trying to merge
javelin in after my changes), which may delay things considerably, but
javelin
: Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 7:45:07 AM
Subject: Re: Restore a VM from template
You provide the IP you want, the hostname you want, and template you want
to deploy from when you call deployVirtualMachine. The previous
End of January is just code freeze I think, still time to fix bugs.
On Jan 5, 2013 3:05 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 01/05/2013 12:51 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
I propose that we use the MERGE tag for any branch merging. I've changed
this subject as such.
Chip also raised
I had the exact same thing as well following devcloud2 instructions. It
seems the ssvm only connects to the host-only network. That's probably fine
for basic testing since there is already a tinylinux template, but we
should consider setting the default zone up such that the ssvm will connect
to
Just a random question, is documentation of new features handled by the Doc
team, or do we as developers need to check in some file somewhere that will
add items to the CloudStack API reference and admin guide? I see the Doc
Writers section on the wiki, but nothing really mentioning the standard
Guys,
I've pushed this as a new branch called 'resizevolume', in order to
collaborate with a few of you on it. I have several questions on how to
proceed, due to refactoring efforts. I'm hoping that the experts in those
efforts can collaborate.
1) Wido, would you be interested in looking at
, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
Hi,
On 01/08/2013 07:55 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Guys,
I've pushed this as a new branch called 'resizevolume', in order to
collaborate with a few of you on it. I have several questions on how to
proceed, due to refactoring efforts. I'm hoping
.
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I had the exact same thing as well following devcloud2 instructions. It
seems the ssvm only connects to the host-only network. That's probably fine
for basic testing since there is already a tinylinux template, but we
it in maven so if a
devcloud.cfg.override is available (or some other name), it would read that
file only while deploysrvr is done.
Regards.
On 09-Jan-2013, at 4:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless anyone objects, I'm going to change the devcloud.cfg for marvin to
add
The only time I log in via VNC is when link local ssh doesn't work. So if
we don't know the password then doing ssh to link local isn't an option.
On Jan 9, 2013 6:54 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan. 10, 2013, 1:04 a.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
Guys,
I'm writing up basic instructions on how to run a devcloud-kvm virtual
machine, for KVM development. The setup is complete, but I've run into a
few things as far as configuration that I'd like some help on.
1) running services. In the past I've just built rpms and installed them in
the
That would be great. We'll put the code in a feature branch and you can
look at it and help us make any adjustments. Brian has been spending a lot
of time on it, and I've wanted him to have credit for that by submitting to
reviews.apache.org, once that happens we can create a branch for it.
I
to using the
advanced sandbox config.
On Jan 11, 2013 7:28 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:53:30PM -0500, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Guys,
I'm writing up basic instructions on how to run a devcloud-kvm virtual
machine, for KVM development. The setup
infrastructure on each nic.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:09 AM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
very cool - hoping I can get a chance to test this out and give some
feedback within the next week or so. Thanks!
On Jan 10, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys
Let me get it working first :-)
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:09 AM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
very cool - hoping I can get a chance to test this out and give some
feedback within the next week or so. Thanks!
On Jan 10, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote
), and I need to be able to set traffic labels to match
physical networks to bridges.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Let me verify that everything is working first :-)
I've had a chance to play with some of the marvin stuff a bit, and am
running
Oh, and this is with normal devcloud, I'm trying to get the configs working
and then once I get the agent start figured out on devcloud-kvm I'll tweak
the cfg to work for that.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm attaching the cfg file that I have so
, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:50:45PM -0500, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I'm attaching the cfg file that I have so far. The goal is to run
everything in the devcloud, with public traffic on the NAT xenbr1
bridge, management, guest vlans on xenbr0. As mentioned, the 'vlan'
setting under zone is tripping up
In running integration tests, I noticed that the volume tests fail because
there are shared and local compute/disk offerings. I propose that we add to
devcloud an /opt/storage/primarynfs directory, shared out in /etc/exports,
and we change the devcloud config to add this primary storage in.
: Re: devcloud-kvm
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:53:30PM -0500, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Guys,
I'm writing up basic instructions on how to run a devcloud-kvm virtual
machine, for KVM development. The setup is complete, but I've run into a
few things as far as configuration that I'd like some
On the KVM side, you can do NFS, Local disk storage, CLVM (shared block
device that has Clustered LVM on top of it, a primary pool is a particular
volume group and cloudstack carves out logical volumes out of it as
needed), and RBD (RADOS Block devices, Ceph shared storage. You point it at
your
Looks like with iSCSI you give it the dns name of your target, the IQN, and
the lun #. Presuably it sets up an SR from that lun and carves volumes out
of that, similar to how the CLVM works. Or maybe it puts a filesystem on it
and mounts it, not sure.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Marcus
storage will be better for vm life cycle.
Yes, let's do this. Marcus, do you want me to create a new image with
these changes? I can do that this weekend.
Regards.
From: Marcus Sorensen [shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 1:33 AM
?
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, I see that it's currently hosted on people.apache.org, and I assumed
you'd know how to replace it. This would help a lot. Thanks
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@citrix.comwrote:
Cool
, they can resize vmdk and resizefs on devcloud and
reboot.
Current disk size is 30GB, do you want this to be extended? I think it
should be sufficient for a small datacenter use case on basic zone on one's
laptop.
Regards.
On 11-Jan-2013, at 3:50 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote
.
On Jan 12, 2013 1:35 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Marcus,
Is your volume integration test in Marvin that we can also run?
Thanks
-min
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 11, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks. It was our playing with making
I'm not super familiar with all of the xen setup, but anything xen supports
as an SR should be usable in presetup mode.
On Jan 13, 2013 10:48 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
On the KVM side, you can do
:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 6:56 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 01/13/2013 06:47 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
wrote:
On the KVM side, you can do NFS, Local disk storage, CLVM (shared
block
device
?
Thanks!
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 6:56 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 01/13/2013 06:47 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 9:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
wrote
Just to follow up on this, looks like the blocker was just the shared
storage. The capacities of the default disk offerings are fine for the
volume tests.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Let's verify actually that those tests do fail due to the large
-968
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-969
[3] http://s.apache.org/rrZ
Thanks,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:05:55PM -0500, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
Marcus - Thanks for bringing these up:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:41:08PM -0500, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Let me verify
?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Just to follow up on this, looks like the blocker was just the shared
storage. The capacities of the default disk offerings are fine for the
volume tests.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow
to work, once that's done I'll update the docs and the
devcloud-kvm should be ready to go.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks. I've tested the vlan stuff and it seems to work. Now I'm stuck on
the traffic labels. My config deploys but my traffic
traffic labels failed to
configure. Thanks,
On 15 January 2013 06:55, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I've now got a config for regular devcloud in
tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg, this works for me to deploy a fully
working advanced network zone, except for the traffic labels
Yes, I just got bitten by this as well. I'm hoping Alex can comment on the
commit because I'm not super familiar with this or what was being fixed by
the change to an OR. It used to be that they keys would generate if you
were running as user 'cloud' OR the developer configuration flag was set.
think it's a plain and simple mistake.
Cheers,
Hugo
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 15 jan. 2013 om 22:08 heeft Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
het volgende geschreven:
Yes, I just got bitten by this as well. I'm hoping Alex can comment on
the
commit because I'm not super familiar
it to cause conflicts.
On Jan 9, 2013 11:16 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 10:56 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] resizeVolume
Guys
I know I'm a bit late to the party, and ive only been halfway paying
attention, but I just want to ensure that we're not going to go down the
path of making this a default setting. One of the current strengths is that
only the resources needed are configured, this persistence has its uses but
will
Sure, but the original devcloud.cfg doesn't have it either. Is it on an
exclude list? Should it be?
On 01/15/2013 01:29 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Marcus,
Can you please add a license header to
tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced_internal-mgt.cfg?
It's causing build errors on builds.a.o. The
Just for clarification, this feature isn't tied to amazon's S3, right? Any
S3 compatible gateway would do?
On Jan 15, 2013 5:52 PM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:
Sudha,
The issue with adding Marvin tests for S3 is the requirement and
associated costs for an S3 account. For obvious
The intent is to create a database user 'cloud' with a password of
'password' (or whatever you specify). This isn't related to cloudstack
logins/accounts at all, it's how cloudstack authenticates with mysql. If
everything is set up properly you should be able to get in via user
'admin', password
Guys,
I'm happy to announce that the devcloud-kvm is open for business :-) I
just ran through the doc at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/devcloud-kvm and
everything worked. I'll see if I can clean up my notes and perhaps have
someone else go through them to find out where
We want this for KVM as well. libvirt has been able to do a storage copy
along with a live migrate for awhile now, so it's just a matter of making
sure that the implementation is compatible so we can plumb in the libvirt
stuff.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Chris Sears
201 - 300 of 797 matches
Mail list logo
