Weighing in late here as well.
First guys, appreciate the contribution. All these awesome ideas, we
appreciate the work.
That said, work *has* to happen in The Apache Way.
Now, some comments:
I would strongly recommend separation of code and data. Build Marketplace
into ACS, allow
Ahh, that's what I was trying to figure out.
To me, a marketplace is moot without infra.
On Dec 12, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT)
kel...@backbonetechnology.com
wrote:
Also has anyone thought of the logistics of hosting/operating an
ecommerce system? Who would be responsible?? What
be responsible?? What payment GW? Broker? Legalities?
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:10 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Marketplace Update
Weighing in late here
Done
Thanks
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 4:20 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Email Conventions
Here's what you need to do in outlook 2010.
Click on the File tab at the top
Click on
Adding to the feature request sheet
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:44 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature for extending the
The feature wish list has been updated to reflect the round table at CCC.
Please review and add details if any of these requests came from you, also feel
free to clean up the organization.
Thanks
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Features+Wish+List
That's my issue too, I use outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:04 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Email Conventions
Chip
I did not find an Option for Auto nesting in
Centos also has a desirable file structure for many as well :)
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:34 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
1. Can you remind me
Have a great vacation/holidays!
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:00 PM
To: CloudStack Developers
Subject: [OFFLINE] December 22 - January 1
The subject should probably be offline-ish... I'm going to be on
vacation
I agree that ELB needs some enhancements. I personally what to find a more
open solution then NetScalar, but there is not too much out there.
I dabbled myself with nginx trying to build an auto-scaling LB system, and
might resurrect that if the proposal for an nginx based VR/LB goes through.
Replies inline
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:36 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC
Is there any logic behind 30? At some point, we're going
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:39 AM
To: CloudStack DeveloperList
Subject: Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC
Sorry, not sure why cloud-init is being clubbed into this feature.
I
that a separate issue.
+1
On 12/18/12 10:42 AM, Kelcey Damage (BT)
kel...@backbonetechnology.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:39 AM
To: CloudStack DeveloperList
Subject: Re: Functional
, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Kelcey Damage (BT)
kel...@backbonetechnology.com
wrote:
I guess we are all in agreement them :)
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:56 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re
if
still
mapped to a public IP)
The workflow is similar for shared net
Does it make sense?
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:22 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Functional
Completely off topic, can you show me how you created the collapsible side
menu on your wiki page?
Thanks
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 11:20 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Kelven Yang
Disregard, it's clearly a core site alteration :)
-Original Message-
From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 11:31 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Better VM Sync on VMware
Completely off topic
So far so good!
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 12:11 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Changes to the wiki
If we're all okay with this, we also need a lot of second level pages and
moving
This is certainly needed,
Thank you
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 12:52 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Kelven Yang
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Raise cluster size limit to 16 on VMware
On
Lol, +1 on this suggestion :)
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 1:00 PM
To: CloudStack DeveloperList
Subject: Re: Changes to the wiki
Very nice. Now can you make the site faster too please? :)
On
Lol, 'diagram conversions' was mine, but no one wanted new diagram designs,
so delete away :)
-kd
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 1:26 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Changes to the wiki
On Wed, Dec
Just don't delete my account related pages :) ,
I'm sure we aren't running out of space.
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 1:38 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Changes to
Hmm, I am going to vote +0 on this one. I see this as something that makes
sense for the future functionality of the CS API, but the fact it is such a
major change, it's hard for me to jump on it. I also very much dislike UUIDs
as they can be cumbersome and unwieldy to manage. The upside is, if we
Thanks John, and thank you everybody. I hope in 2013 I can involve myself to
a larger degree in the project.
-kd
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 12:38 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org cloudstack-
+1
-kd
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 12:05 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Project Bylaws
+1
On Jan 2, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Aww, I was hoping for a RickRolling!
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 2:02 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New committer: Kelcey Damage
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Sonny Chhen
Awesome, that made my day :)
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 2:10 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New committer: Kelcey Damage
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT)
kel
Hootsuite bought the building around the corner from my DC. Will be their
headquarters/main DC.
-kd
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 10:14 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack
Congrats Sebastien!
KELCEY DAMAGE
Infrastructure Systems Architect
www.backbonetechnology.com
-
kel...@backbonetechnology.com
address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4
tel: +1 604 713 8560 ext:114
fax: +1 604
Not restore, but you can re-instance. Make a call to provision a VM from the
template catalog. It will be a new sequenced clone, not a restore. With CS you
don’t really use VMs, the term ‘instance’ is actually quite correct. They are
‘stateless’ to the hypervisor, and exist only in the DB. So
Right off the bat, I like what's being proposed here. Being able to 1-shot
provision application infrastructures is a great feature. And to store these
pocket infrastructures as blue-prints in the template system I think makes
the most sense.
As for guest automation, I too would like to see
+1 (binding) from me as well
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 12:57 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of marvin automated tests from Citrix
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013, at 02:50
+1 for YAML, I find JSON good for when I never look at the data and simply pass
to a Python dictionary, however for interaction I am going to back the YAML
choice.
KELCEY DAMAGE
Infrastructure Systems Architect
www.backbonetechnology.com
+1 for getting CS into a distro or two. And for resolving the concerns below
which strike me as pretty important to focus on first.
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Robert Schweikert [mailto:rjsch...@suse.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 9:29 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
I believe the idea is that CPU cores are treated like compute units, and speed
is simply a value the admin set based on availability and cost model. However
the fact that you can create many different compute units, lets you leverage a
more granular pricing model. CloudStack already factors
My bad, I see you were discussing speed per core in relation to quotas and
resource constraints/account restrictions.
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:53 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Gave it a read through,
+1 (Binding)
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:09 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRXF5 inline mode support in
CloudStack from
So to catch myself up, this will allow functional security group
isolation/ACLs on both 'shared' and 'isolated' networks?
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:36 PM
To:
My position is the same as Joe, judicious email filters.
TBH I would like a copy of everything to go to the list. If certain people
want to CC above and beyond that, I think it's ok. We really need to keep
the archival working.
Thanks
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang
That sounds awesome Hugo, looking forward to it.
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:22 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [SCREENCAST] request for screencast to demo features
What you can't gauge is the amount of emails and conversations I have, for
instance, with magazines and VPs all very interested in ACS, where it is
,and how long it will take. I can imagine several community members field
the same types of question I do daily.
Openstack has higher numbers, yes...
My name got attached to 1180, and I'm not sure why. I am not what you would
call capable of reviewing the submission other then from a legal/compliance
perspective.
Thanks
-Kelcey
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February
Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 3:05 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS41] Yet another reviewboard reminder... for both
committers and contributors.
My name got attached to 1180, and I'm not sure why. I am not what you
I'd like to start re-blogging/linking the weeklies as my blog space is
currently dormant.
Any issues in me doing that?
Thanks
-KELCEY DAMAGE
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:42 AM
To: CloudStack Developers
Subject:
I'm with Joe on this, best to avoid an over specific mission statement.
Should leave room to interpret and grow. Besides the simpler and more direct
the statement the easier it is to consume and follow.
My 2 cents
-KELCEY DAMAGE
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier
Hi,
I can’t remember, do we enable HA on a per host basis, or on a per cluster
basis?
Thanks.
http://www.backbone.gr/media/backbone_symbol1.pngKelcey Damage
Infrastructure Systems Architect
http://www.backbonetechnology.com/ www.backbonetechnology.com
+1
KELCEY DAMAGE
Infrastructure Systems Architect
www.backbonetechnology.com
-
kel...@backbonetechnology.com
address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4
tel: +1 604 713 8560 ext:114
fax: +1 604 605 0964
skype:
I thought with CS we still needed vcenter, which would make the answer a no.
But by CS hosts do you mean management servers?
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 1:36 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VMWARE]
CloudStack management servers (4.0 and 4.1) on the same
cluster.
-Original Message-
From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 4:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VMWARE] Can 1 VSphere cluster - be managed by 2 CS
hosts
Correct, there is no deep integration like agent, however it creates system
VMs
and storage pool and I'm not certain if it find them as conflicting..
-Original Message-
From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 5:17 PM
Congratulation all!
-kd
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:45 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Graduation
Yay :-) Congratulations everyone!
-Original Message-
From: Chip
51 matches
Mail list logo
