Hi,
I have created an out-of-source build tree (on Windows), with the
installation directory as a subfolder of the build trees. The idea is
that the compiled binary requires some DLL's, images, 3D models and
configuration files, at a location relative to the executable. If the
files are
On 26. Jan, 2009, at 12:24, Jonatan Bijl wrote:
Hi,
I have created an out-of-source build tree (on Windows), with the
installation directory as a subfolder of the build trees. The idea is
that the compiled binary requires some DLL's, images, 3D models and
configuration files, at a location
Gopala Krishna wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
The progress reporting only supports one make at a time in the build tree.
-Bill
Is there any documentation somewhere on how the percentage reporting
is implemented ? If not it would really
My personal suggestion would be to use the plain MakeFiles generator
and then inside eclipse create a C++ Makefile project. You can then
point the project settings at the build directory to find the makefile
and also tell eclipse to use make all install as the build command
instead of
Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com writes:
Gopala Krishna wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
wrote:
The progress reporting only supports one make at a time in the build tree.
-Bill
Is there any documentation somewhere on how the percentage
Hello,
is it possible to influence the build-order of MSVC from
CMakeLists.txt-files?
The top-level CMakeLists.txt looks like this:
ADD_SUBDIRECTORY(lib1)
ADD_SUBDIRECTORY(lib2)
ADD_SUBDIRECTORY(lib3)
ADD_SUBDIRECTORY(lib4)
ADD_SUBDIRECTORY(prog)
prog depends on the libs. lib3 depends on lib1
On 26. Jan, 2009, at 15:05, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com writes:
Gopala Krishna wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
wrote:
The progress reporting only supports one make at a time in the
build tree.
-Bill
Is
Micha,
Use
*target_link_librarieshttp://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake2.6docs.html#command:target_link_libraries
* and
*add_dependencieshttp://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake2.6docs.html#command:add_dependencies
* to fix project build order.
2009/1/26 Micha Renner micha.ren...@t-online.de
Michael Wild them...@gmail.com writes:
On 26. Jan, 2009, at 15:05, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com writes:
Gopala Krishna wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Bill Hoffman
bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
The progress reporting only supports one make at a
Am Montag, den 26.01.2009, 16:22 +0200 schrieb Dmytro Ovdiienko:
Micha,
Use target_link_libraries and add_dependencies to fix project build
order.
I think, that this doesn't work in the case here.
For target_link_libraries I need a library. If prog is first in build
process then there are
I've come across a test on the VXL dashboard that seems to segfault
only on some test machines.
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=12name=bvxm_test_apm_processorsdate=2009-01-26
One of the failing machines is mine (Mac_OS_X-10.5.6_unix_make). When
I run the same test
Matthew Leotta wrote:
I've come across a test on the VXL dashboard that seems to segfault only
on some test machines.
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=12name=bvxm_test_apm_processorsdate=2009-01-26
One of the failing machines is mine (Mac_OS_X-10.5.6_unix_make). When I
Hi all,
I am currently migrating a project to CMake, and have been linking targets
to project libraries using full paths (i.e., embracing the NEW CMP0003
policy of CMake = 2.6). However, my co-workers are reluctant to embrace
this because the old CMP0003 policy has not yet yielded incorrect
Adolfo Rodríguez wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently migrating a project to CMake, and have been linking
targets to project libraries using full paths (i.e., embracing the NEW
CMP0003 policy of CMake = 2.6). However, my co-workers are reluctant to
embrace this because the old CMP0003 policy has
Brad,
Thanks, but I'm not sure if I completely understand your
suggestion. Let me clarify. If I run the test executable
./bvxm_test_all
I get no errors and no segfault. I know how to debug this, but there
is nothing to debug. If in the same directory I run
ctest
then the test
Matthew Leotta wrote:
Brad,
Thanks, but I'm not sure if I completely understand your suggestion.
Let me clarify. If I run the test executable
./bvxm_test_all
I get no errors and no segfault. I know how to debug this, but there is
nothing to debug. If in the same directory I run
Adolfo Rodríguez wrote:
I am currently migrating a project to CMake, and have been linking
targets to project libraries using full paths (i.e., embracing the NEW
CMP0003 policy of CMake = 2.6). However, my co-workers are reluctant to
embrace this because the old CMP0003 policy has not yet
On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Brad King wrote:
Matthew Leotta wrote:
Brad,
Thanks, but I'm not sure if I completely understand your suggestion.
Let me clarify. If I run the test executable
./bvxm_test_all
I get no errors and no segfault. I know how to debug this, but
there is
nothing
On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Matthew Leotta wrote:
On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Brad King wrote:
Matthew Leotta wrote:
Brad,
Thanks, but I'm not sure if I completely understand your suggestion.
Let me clarify. If I run the test executable
./bvxm_test_all
I get no errors and no
Matthew Leotta wrote:
On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Brad King wrote:
add_test(run_xterm xterm)
$ ctest -R run_xterm
Then run gdb and the test inside the xterm to see if it fails. It could
be an environment difference.
-Brad
It runs fine from within xterm when xterm is launched as a
Hi,
I'm currently using CMake 2.6.2 and the FindwxWidgets.cmake module that
comes pre-packaged with the installation doesn't seem to properly work on
windows. I set CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH so that it would be able to find the
wxWidgets in a custom location. It does find wxWidgets_ROOT_DIR, but does
not
Hi all!
Issue 1:
Porting an old project to CMake I realized there's no way to modify the
predefined behavior when one adds an IDL file to a Visual Studio
project, which is associating it to midl.
In our project we'd rather need to execute a different IDL compiler
(TAO_IDL), but declaring an
22 matches
Mail list logo