The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12450
==
Reported By:Druon
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12451
==
Reported By:Druon
Assigned To:
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 19:54:46 schrieb Peter Collingbourne:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:04:42PM -0400, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peter Collingbourne pe...@pcc.me.uk
Date: Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:17 PM
Subject: Proposal:
The make option -s switches off printing the commands, but this seems not to be
working for the CMake generated link command for shared libraries. Does anybody
know how to avoid the printing of the link command?
The reason I need this is because one of my large libraries produces a command
Hello everybody,
I have a Fortran project that is currently built (using gfortran, g95 or
ifort) on 32 bits machines but that might need quite soon to be built on
64 bit machines as well.
Does cmake automatically detect the processor architecture and add the
64 bit flag at configuration
I did forget the ML.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/9/9
Subject: Re: [CMake] 64 bit flags
To: pellegrini pellegr...@ill.fr
2011/9/9 pellegrini pellegr...@ill.fr:
Hello everybody,
I have a Fortran project that is currently built
Thanks a lot Eric for the clear explanation.
Eric
Eric Noulard a écrit :
I did forget the ML.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/9/9
Subject: Re: [CMake] 64 bit flags
To: pellegrini pellegr...@ill.fr
2011/9/9 pellegrini
I can finally give a good concrete case where I might need to do this (or
need some other very clever solution).
I have created a distcheck command for BRL-CAD that has a lot of
responsibilities, including doing a complete configure and build of BRL-CAD
from a source archive expanded from a CPack
This is very cool work Peter. How well is this generator doing with the
CMake tests? Is there a nija for windows? I would be interested in
testing that.
-Bill
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
Per the customizing Makefile email, I'd like to ask if a mechanism exists or
could be implemented to allow CMakeLists.txt files to define commands that
pass a CPU count to subcommands - e.g. something that allows the generators
to take a syntax along the lines of:
ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET(subbuild
Peter,
I am very interested in the ninja generator and gave it a try for one of my
very large projects. Unfortunately, I have approximately 100 targets all with
the same output name(simple) but in CMake I give them all unique target
names(dot separated name built from their place in the
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Clifford Yapp cliffy...@gmail.com wrote:
Per the customizing Makefile email, I'd like to ask if a mechanism exists or
could be implemented to allow CMakeLists.txt files to define commands that
pass a CPU count to subcommands - e.g. something that allows the
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Peter Collingbourne pe...@pcc.me.uk wrote:
Anyone who is interested in trying the Ninja generator with
their own projects is welcome to clone my repository at:
https://github.com/pcc/CMake/tree/ninja-generator
and to report any issues encountered. Note that
Hi,
I need to use a mix with SWIG and Python in a windows environment. I
used SWIG_LINK_LIBRARIES( blabla ${PYTHON_LIBRARIES}) where
${PYTHON_LIBRARIES} I get using FindPackage(PythonLibs).
But I have blank space in ${PYTHON_LIBRARIES} and this cause a error in
my vcproj. Ex.
If
The CMake 2.8.6 release candidate stream continues! You can find the
source and binaries here:
http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D
This email is also available on the Kitware blog at
http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/165
If you want to test this out and ask for a fix, do it soon, or
Looks like $(MAKE) will do it, at least in testing so far - awesome! Thanks
David.
Cliff.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:15 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
if(${CMAKE_GENERATOR} MATCHES Make AND
(${cmake_generator} MATCHES Make OR NOT cmake_generator))
# The
If you are building on Linux, try
MAKEFLAGS=j8 make distcheck
I have successfully used the MAKEFLAGS environment variable to propagate
parallel build invocations through scripts that invoke make with fixed
options.
-Mike
On 09/09/2011 09:21 AM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
I can finally give a
Reading through make documentation, seems setting -jx to MAKEFLAGS is a
no-op.
*The `-j' option is a special case (see section Parallel
Executionhttp://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/localfiles/infofiles/make/make_47.html#SEC46).
If you set it to some numeric value, `-j 1' is always put into
Yes, but only when setting MAKEFLAGS from within a Makefile. It appears
the rules do not apply when MAKEFLAGS is set by the invoking shell.
(And actually, current GNU make handles parallel execution differently
on Linux, using a job server that all make subprocesses use to
coordinate
Thanks Mike, good to know! David actually solved my problem for me with the
generator based conditional and the $(MAKE) variable, but that's a nifty
workaround to have tucked away.
Cheers,
CY
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Mike Wittman m...@headwave.com wrote:
**
If you are building on
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 5a768fc24e4e0b75ca939abec533ed89bfd101bf (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, release has been updated
via 281b93734c306a29b4c2d151e2541178a8a18cc7 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via ea10d5350c45f5a183f724322c86404c8f8413ed (commit)
via
23 matches
Mail list logo
