[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013463]: Bug 12621 is maybe back

2012-08-10 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13463 == Reported By:Jerry Krinock Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013464]: Generated Eclipse project file contains wrong paths

2012-08-10 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13464 == Reported By:Alexander Broekhuis Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013465]: Add GIT Team provider to Eclipse Project Files

2012-08-10 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13465 == Reported By:Alexander Broekhuis Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 2.8.9 available for download

2012-08-10 Thread Stephen Kelly
David Cole wrote: On behalf of myself, Ken, Bill, Brad, Alex, Zach, Ben, Eike, Eric and the rest of the CMake team from all around the world, we are pleased to announce that CMake 2.8.9 is now available for download at: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D Congratulations on the

[cmake-developers] Unique compile definitions

2012-08-10 Thread Stephen Kelly
Hi, I've merged a branch into next to ensure that compiler definitions are only added one time on the command line. I haven't yet merged it to next because I'm not sure if other generators need a similar change (I tested with Makefiles and Ninja), and I'm not sure if there's any reason it is

[cmake-developers] qt4_use_modules

2012-08-10 Thread Stephen Kelly
Hi, I've added a qt4_use_modules function to Qt4Macros.cmake. I'm looking for some review before merging it to next. As qt5_use_modules is the best way to use Qt5, and as it is easier to port from qt4_use_modules to qt5_use_modules than to port from the free use of cmake commands for

Re: [cmake-developers] Cmake and visual studio failing to build....

2012-08-10 Thread David Cole
Can you try again with a nightly build of CMake? There's a change that we did not take that *is* in the nightly build, but is not in the 2.8.9 release. I'd like to know if that change is responsible for this behavior. We were uncertain of this commit [

Re: [cmake-developers] qt4_use_modules

2012-08-10 Thread David Cole
I assume it's the qt4_use_modules branch on the stage? On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've added a qt4_use_modules function to Qt4Macros.cmake. I'm looking for some review before merging it to next. As qt5_use_modules is the best way to use

Re: [cmake-developers] test for watcom version fails (InstallRequiredSYstemLibraries)

2012-08-10 Thread Brad King
On 08/09/2012 09:00 PM, J Decker wrote: Please make mod to fix (last message has correction) http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11866#bugnotes I don't have git available at this moment, but it's a one line change... See the note I just added here:

Re: [cmake-developers] Unique compile definitions

2012-08-10 Thread Brad King
On 08/10/2012 04:53 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: I've merged a branch into next to ensure that compiler definitions are only added one time on the command line. The Preprocessor test already has extensive coverage of COMPILE_DEFINITIONS. Can that test be extended for your cases instead of adding a

Re: [cmake-developers] qt4_use_modules

2012-08-10 Thread Stephen Kelly
David Cole wrote: I assume it's the qt4_use_modules branch on the stage? Yes, sorry, I should have pointed that out. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the

Re: [cmake-developers] Unique compile definitions

2012-08-10 Thread Brad King
On 08/10/2012 08:53 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: The point of doing it in a separate test was to be more clearly able to see the duplication without it getting lost in a different test, and to be able to see which one sets which definition first (add_defintions or

[cmake-developers] Development pause for sweeping style changes

2012-08-10 Thread Brad King
Hi Folks, With 2.8.9 out we'd like to perform two sweeping style change commits: (1) Remove all remnants of trailing whitespace (2) Convert all CMake language code to use lower-case commands These changes are likely to conflict with many changes others may be doing. We'd like to first merge or

Re: [cmake-developers] Unique compile definitions

2012-08-10 Thread Stephen Kelly
Brad King wrote: On 08/10/2012 08:53 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: The point of doing it in a separate test was to be more clearly able to see the duplication without it getting lost in a different test, and to be able to see which one sets which definition first (add_defintions or

Re: [cmake-developers] Development pause for sweeping style changes

2012-08-10 Thread Stephen Kelly
Brad King wrote: Hi Folks, With 2.8.9 out we'd like to perform two sweeping style change commits: (1) Remove all remnants of trailing whitespace (2) Convert all CMake language code to use lower-case commands Sounds great to me :) Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit

Re: [cmake-developers] Development pause for sweeping style changes

2012-08-10 Thread David Cole
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 08/10/2012 10:52 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: Stephen Kelly wrote: Brad King wrote: Hi Folks, With 2.8.9 out we'd like to perform two sweeping style change commits: (1) Remove all remnants of trailing whitespace (2)

Re: [cmake-developers] Development pause for sweeping style changes

2012-08-10 Thread Brad King
On 08/10/2012 10:52 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: Stephen Kelly wrote: Brad King wrote: Hi Folks, With 2.8.9 out we'd like to perform two sweeping style change commits: (1) Remove all remnants of trailing whitespace (2) Convert all CMake language code to use lower-case commands Do you

Re: [cmake-developers] Unique compile definitions

2012-08-10 Thread Brad King
On 08/10/2012 10:30 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: I've updated the branch with the API change to use std::set. The XCode generator does not use the cmLocalGenerator::AppendDefines method, but the VisualStudio6Generator does. That wasn't quite what I had in mind. The string of escaped defines

Re: [cmake-developers] Development pause for sweeping style changes

2012-08-10 Thread Stephen Kelly
David Cole wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: Do you also have a script to clear the contents of endforeach(), endif(), endmacro(), endfunction()? Or do you not want to do that? That's a bit more risky because sometimes they span multiple lines.

Re: [cmake-developers] test for watcom version fails (InstallRequiredSYstemLibraries)

2012-08-10 Thread J Decker
Okay figured out the required mods to use the common version variable... http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11866#c30208 On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 08/09/2012 09:00 PM, J Decker wrote: Please make mod to fix (last message has

Re: [cmake-developers] Cmake and visual studio failing to build....

2012-08-10 Thread J Decker
Ya, unfortunatly I don't have the specific case that was failing anymore... it's probably because I've been using the same build output since 2.8.6 and just keep updating cmake... last couple versions have actually gone smoothly On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:21 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com

Re: [cmake-developers] Cmake and visual studio failing to build....

2012-08-10 Thread David Cole
Have you even used a nightly CMake from the last month or so, or have you only been using release candidates and official releases? On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:35 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: Ya, unfortunatly I don't have the specific case that was failing anymore... it's probably

Re: [cmake-developers] Cmake and visual studio failing to build....

2012-08-10 Thread J Decker
Mostly stable releases a week or so after non RC is released... On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:39 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: Have you even used a nightly CMake from the last month or so, or have you only been using release candidates and official releases? On Fri, Aug 10, 2012

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013466]: wish: do not require VS/dumpbin to obtain prerequisites for bundles

2012-08-10 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13466 == Reported By:Daniel Franke Assigned To:

Re: [CMake] Eclipse generator on mac

2012-08-10 Thread Alexander Broekhuis
Hi, Can you please post the output of the following command here ? g++ -v -E -x c++ -dD /dev/null (or clang if you're using that). It would be even better if you could create a bug report at http://public.kitware.com/Bug for this and put the information there :-) I've created a bug

[CMake] CMake 2.8.8-2.8.9 - Generate Xcode 4.4.1 project

2012-08-10 Thread Romain LEGUAY
Hi everyone! I have a problem to generate a Xcode project. I completely remove Xcode 4.4.1 (and command line tools) and CMake 2.8.9. I reinstall Xcode 4.4.1 and command line tools and CMake 2.8.9. I had this error when I try to generate a XCode project ('cmake -GXcode .'): xcodebuild:

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.8-2.8.9 - Generate Xcode 4.4.1 project

2012-08-10 Thread Romain LEGUAY
Hi again! I succeed to generate a Xcode project (with a normal user) with cmake-gui. I hope this new information can lead you to the solution. Regards, Romain Le 10/08/12 11:34, Romain LEGUAY a écrit : Hi everyone! I have a problem to generate a Xcode project. I completely remove Xcode

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.8-2.8.9 - Generate Xcode 4.4.1 project

2012-08-10 Thread David Cole
There is never any reason to run CMake as root or to use sudo to configure a project build tree with CMake. Mixing and matching use of sudo/non-sudo within the same build tree is simply asking for file permissions problems. On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Romain LEGUAY romain.leg...@gmail.com

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.8 : Reproducible Crash in Mac OS X 10.8

2012-08-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 8/9/2012 6:04 PM, Jerry Krinock wrote: Although not requiring installation of Xcode's command-line tools would be nice, at a minimum, CMake's runtime, or at least its installer, should check for any needed prerequisites and inform the user if a prerequisite is missing. I've spent several

[CMake] nested variables with @ONLY: ${${PROJECT}_FLAGS} vs. @@PROJECT@_FLAGS@

2012-08-10 Thread Nico Schlömer
When templating ProjectConfig.cmake files, I like to have ${MY_CMAKE_VARIABLE} stuff in the output, so I use @ONLY at configure time, e.g., configure_file(ProjectConfig.cmake.in ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}/ProjectConfig.cmake @ONLY) The @-syntax in ProjectConfig.cmake.in works okay most

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.8 : Reproducible Crash in Mac OS X 10.8

2012-08-10 Thread Michael Jackson
I am going to be *very* pedantic here so you may slap me upside the head. The compiler was never just there on OS X. It has *always* required the installation of the developer tools. With 10.8 it would seem that installing Xcode is not enough to get the command line tools any more. The

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.8 : Reproducible Crash in Mac OS X 10.8

2012-08-10 Thread David Cole
Yes, it's true, but now there's extra required beyond simply installing Xcode. Brad's partially addressed the problem here today, with this commit, now in 'next': http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=e88bae77c3388a5b474b081e572004f02772d162 However, in order to run on one of

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.8 : Reproducible Crash in Mac OS X 10.8

2012-08-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 8/10/2012 2:30 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: I am going to be *very* pedantic here so you may slap me upside the head. The compiler was never just there on OS X. It has *always* required the installation of the developer tools. With 10.8 it would seem that installing Xcode is not enough to get

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.8 : Reproducible Crash in Mac OS X 10.8

2012-08-10 Thread Michael Jackson
Agreed on all points. -- Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net On Aug 10, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: On 8/10/2012 2:30 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: I am going to be *very* pedantic here so you may slap me upside the head. The compiler was never just there on OS X. It has *always* required

[CMake] Bug fix requests for the *next* release of CMake...

2012-08-10 Thread David Cole
Hi all, Replies requested. Short replies only. Read on. Just a short reply with bug numbers or links to the bugs is all we need here. Example one-line reply: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13463 Please move specific discussions into the bugs themselves or start a new thread to

[CMake] CMake 2.8.8/9 and Xcode 4.4

2012-08-10 Thread Etuka Onono
I have had trouble building xcode projects from Cmake since xcode changed its location from /Developer/Application. Having built and played with my own cmake version, I now see that the reason I have not been able to generate xcode projects is because I have chosen to install xcode in a

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.8/9 and Xcode 4.4

2012-08-10 Thread Etuka Onono
By xcode plist, I mean xcode's version.plist... On 11 Aug 2012, at 01:38, Etuka Onono et...@tesco.net wrote: I have had trouble building xcode projects from Cmake since xcode changed its location from /Developer/Application. Having built and played with my own cmake version, I now see that

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.8/9 and Xcode 4.4

2012-08-10 Thread David Cole
Brad fixed this today, and if the nightly builds work overnight tonight, nightly builds of CMake will be able to use xcode-select to dynamically determine the location of Xcode. This fix will be in the next official CMake release, 2.8.10. On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Etuka Onono

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.8-3646-g19ecefe

2012-08-10 Thread Stephen Kelly
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 19ecefe44161e0e33dc3ede86d8316d1cf37f4ab (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake annotated tag, v2.8.9, created. v2.8.9

2012-08-10 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The annotated tag, v2.8.9 has been created at 267a18442f202f756b76fe7344cbf653765e4630 (tag) tagging

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.9-3043-geb0df2a

2012-08-10 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via eb0df2af00914a20e29eb57e4c0348902edbeacb (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v2.8.9-3-g95e8636

2012-08-10 Thread Kitware Robot
Stamp diff --git a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake index 06f2820..2ca7bed 100644 --- a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake +++ b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ SET(CMake_VERSION_MAJOR 2) SET(CMake_VERSION_MINOR 8) SET(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 9) -SET(CMake_VERSION_TWEAK 20120810