[cmake-developers] Expression unit test

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Kümmel
A unit tests for expressions is broken for ninja: http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=161505814build=2596684 ninja prints the wrong parameter as it is used in the cmake file, include_directories($TARGET_PROPERTY:Invali/dTarget,INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES) but the test wants the $ escaped

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013573]: RPATH not supported when cross compiling for FreeBSD

2012-10-05 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13573 == Reported By:muhkuh Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] I: I want to become a maintainer of several modules.

2012-10-05 Thread Brad King
On 10/05/2012 08:29 AM, Aleksey Avdeev wrote: I modified the proposed modules. Thanks for working on them. Let's start with FindIcotool since it is pretty simple and doesn't depend on the other modules. After that we can move on to the others. Please proceed with step 5 of the new maintainer

Re: [cmake-developers] patch for cmake that adds a new timestamp command

2012-10-05 Thread Nils Gladitz
My initial thought was that NOTFOUND would be a good idea since it evaluates to false and the get_*_property commands also seem to use it. Looking at the documentation for if() again only -NOTFOUND as a suffix should evaluate to false though (I assume the documentation is incomplete here?).

Re: [cmake-developers] patch for cmake that adds a new timestamp command

2012-10-05 Thread Brad King
On 10/05/2012 02:53 PM, Nils Gladitz wrote: My initial thought was that NOTFOUND would be a good idea since it evaluates to false and the get_*_property commands also seem to use it. I wrote the more general get_property command to replace those and the newer command uses empty string rather

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013574]: Ninja: no transitive dependency for imported libraries

2012-10-05 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13574 == Reported By:Peter Kuemmel Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013575]: No print messages after PROJECT(name)

2012-10-05 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13575 == Reported By:Krzysiek Assigned To:

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.10-rc1 ready for testing!

2012-10-05 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Stephen Kelly wrote: Robert Dailey wrote: Could we get a list of all the new generator expressions? Is there 2.8.10 documentation online somewhere that might have them documented? I don't think there's generated html docs, but here's the new addition to the INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES target

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.10-rc1 ready for testing!

2012-10-05 Thread Stephen Kelly
Rolf Eike Beer wrote: $TARGET_PROPERTY:prop = The value of the property prop on the target on which the generator expression is evaluated. Then tell me on which target an include_directories is evaluated on ;) Each of them: add_executable(foo ${foo_SRCS}) add_library(bar ${bar_SRCS})

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.10-rc1 ready for testing!

2012-10-05 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am 2012-10-05 10:54, schrieb Stephen Kelly: Rolf Eike Beer wrote: $TARGET_PROPERTY:prop = The value of the property prop on the target on which the generator expression is evaluated. Then tell me on which target an include_directories is evaluated on ;) Each of them:

Re: [CMake] CMake/Ninja support in Qt Creator

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 25.09.2012 23:17, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: I have tested it with VTK, and will likely look at some of the other projects I am working on soon. So far so good - thanks for pushing this forward. How much of this will make it into Qt Creator 2.6? The essential patches are now in the official

Re: [CMake] CMake/Ninja support in Qt Creator

2012-10-05 Thread Loaden
The essential patches are now in the official 2.6 branch great! And I've back ported a CMake code completion patch to my 2.6-ninja branch. It only doesn't work with Qt5. But it works well with Qt4. both in Windows and Linux. It's maybe Qt5's bug. But I can't figure out what's the wrong.

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.9-1024-g13921b2

2012-10-05 Thread Brad King
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 13921b2c3396aafc50ad47318b103e108a780387 (commit) via