Hello Robert,
is there a list which showing the changes between rc1 and rc2, to test such
things explicitly?
Regards
Roman
Am 24.02.2015 um 16:01 schrieb Robert Maynard robert.mayn...@kitware.com:
I am proud to announce the CMake 3.2 second release candidate.
Sources and binaries are
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via dbad49705ec07a80248e333e4ca7f6cc17fa3766 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via ef542c86a53d0973e2de10cdaf140c9608e02402 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via fa6da5fcd8aa5bdfa4a635a9890af9c7c09456a8 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 3f6c93b98691da7426cd9b75bea1d6ba132091a8 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via b38f535eaa648005d700e214ac77c774b4a7509e (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via 71a610ff2997bd0d92c332572c0dd35405a77682 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via eba94c24021fd411aa8196015bd91ad1f66ba61b (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, release has been updated
via cd935b03bfee380f6d2a3999dbc9bf6f929485bc (commit)
via
Hello Robert,
is there a list which showing the changes between rc1 and rc2, to test such
things explicitly?
Regards
Roman
Am 24.02.2015 um 16:01 schrieb Robert Maynard robert.mayn...@kitware.com:
I am proud to announce the CMake 3.2 second release candidate.
Sources and binaries are
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15418
==
Reported By:rhabarbersaft
Assigned To:
You could patch the executable to make cmLoadCommandCommand return
true from IsScriptable... but if you're going to the trouble of
patching CMake anyhow, why not simply build your loadable command
directly into CMake...?
The other thing might be to mention specifically what the performance
Hi Roman,
We do attach the short-log of all changes made between each RC version
to the bottom of the annoucement. But here are the changes plus the
git SHA1's for each ( produced with git log --no-merges --oneline
v3.2.0-rc1..v3.2.0-rc2)
99575c9 CMake 3.2.0-rc2
b4005a3 FindCurses: Drop unused
Hello there,
I am new to CMake and I am trying to convert a project to work with CMake.
As a part of the process I need to create a DLL from a FORTRAN code.
Here are some details:
*The code works on Visual Studio and creates the DLL as required.
*The main subroutine looks like this:
Hi Doron,
it would be helpful if you provided the error you're getting from
add_library(), and also showed the exact CMake code you used.
Petr
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Doron Klepach klepa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello there,
I am new to CMake and I am trying to convert a project to work
Hello Petr,
Thank you for the quick reply. At this point I am not getting any errors,
but nothing happens when I build the sln in Visual Studio - no dll is
created.
Here is the main CMake code:
cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 3.1)
project (micro_linMatl_I)
enable_language (Fortran)
# The
You're not giving the DLL micro_linMatl_l any source files, so there's
nothing to build. You need to list at least one source file in the
add_library() call. You mentioned a main subroutine in your first e-mail;
the file containing the main subroutine should be listed in the
add_library(SHARED)
Hi Roman,
We do attach the short-log of all changes made between each RC version
to the bottom of the annoucement. But here are the changes plus the
git SHA1's for each ( produced with git log --no-merges --oneline
v3.2.0-rc1..v3.2.0-rc2)
99575c9 CMake 3.2.0-rc2
b4005a3 FindCurses: Drop unused
Hello,
Thanks for the quick reply!
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
Jakob van Bethlehem wrote:
Dear users,
set(CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH C:/Qt/Qt5.4.0/5.4/msvc2013_64_opengl/lib/cmake)
Don't do this. Pass CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH as an argument to cmake.
On 02/25/2015 04:11 AM, Raffi Enficiaud wrote:
Is it ok if I rebase on 1416d21?
Yes, please.
Thanks,
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via f36c2841a7a62fb1d6df9c12065f79f4a54be996 (commit)
via
On 02/23/2015 12:55 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 02/21/2015 04:33 PM, Domen Vrankar wrote:
Attached are patches with fixed patch 3.
Thanks. I'll start with the SystemTools change which I've split
out into its own commit and pushed here:
http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/19304/
That one
Hi,
is it possible to specify the --depth 1 argument in ExternalProject_Add for
cloning projects from git?
Cheers,
Miklos
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support
On 02/24/2015 05:25 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Until that problem is solved we cannot make object libraries
implicitly offer their objects just through tll().
Honestly, the problem is still not clear to me.
Consider an object library with some usage requirements:
add_library(objlib OBJECT
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 3fd4bd8cf59b0e3612f4d946201f63485f245649 (commit)
via
Thank you very much
Am 25.02.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Robert Maynard robert.mayn...@kitware.com:
Hi Roman,
We do attach the short-log of all changes made between each RC version
to the bottom of the annoucement. But here are the changes plus the
git SHA1's for each ( produced with git log
Thank you very much
Am 25.02.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Robert Maynard robert.mayn...@kitware.com:
Hi Roman,
We do attach the short-log of all changes made between each RC version
to the bottom of the annoucement. But here are the changes plus the
git SHA1's for each ( produced with git log
Hello,
For our CI and production build we call cmake --build to execute the
actual build. To be able to examine the build logs we added
-DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON to the configuration step. This worked as
expected for the Makefile generator but is ignored for Ninja.
As far as I understand the
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 9715186541d1b94762a36a85ad769339c13c9c60 (commit)
via
Signed-off-by: Gregor Jasny gja...@googlemail.com
---
Tests/CMakeLists.txt | 13 +
Tests/XCTest/CMakeLists.txt| 62 ++
Tests/XCTest/CocoaExample/AppDelegate.h| 7 +
Tests/XCTest/CocoaExample/AppDelegate.m| 18 +
An XCTest bundle is a CFBundle with a special product-type and bundle
extension. For more information about XCTest visit the Mac
Developer library at:
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/testing_with_xcode/
Signed-off-by: Gregor Jasny
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 13:44:13 -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
snip
After discussion with Brad here, the current, tentative, plan is as
follows:
- When creating $LINK_ONLY generator expressions, if the name is a
target, add $TARGET_NAME as well. This will help the exporter find
targets
Hello,
this series contains the latest XCTest patches.
Changes since v5:
* Rebased against master (could drop two applied patches)
* kept help modules list sorted
* indirected xctest wiring
Thanks,
Gregor
Gregor Jasny (2):
Add handling for XCTest bundles
Add XCTest example to test
When multiple executables or libraries depend on the same fortran source
file that contains a module, parallel (Makefile) builds are failing for me
because the .mod file is getting moved/renamed/written by more than one
process at a time. Is there a way to have the same module containing
On 02/25/2015 12:38 PM, Gregor Jasny wrote:
Ninja has no equivalent option.
As a work-around would it be possible that cmake --build examines the
cache, detects CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON and adds a -v to the Ninja
invocation?
If you know that the build tree was generated with the Ninja
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 731f11216cb3f40fd7ab5facfc037759e4e62838 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 966b73f5903810892388aecd379d844e1d830169 (commit)
via
Ninja build system does not support a in-Makefile verbositiy
switch. So we use cmake --build as a fall back to extract the
CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE property and pass it as an optional
-v argument to Ninja.
Signed-off-by: Gregor Jasny gja...@googlemail.com
---
Source/cmGlobalGenerator.cxx | 2
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15419
==
Reported By:Stephen Kelly
Assigned To:
On 02/25/2015 01:58 PM, Zaak Beekman wrote:
When multiple executables or libraries depend on the same
fortran source file that contains a module, parallel (Makefile)
builds are failing for me because the .mod file is getting
moved/renamed/written by more than one process at a time. Is
there a
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 9c73f92cde601f229547ed4795a4d4d351b43a02 (commit)
via
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15420
==
Reported By:Stephen Kelly
Assigned To:
On 02/25/2015 04:24 PM, Gregor Jasny wrote:
Ninja build system does not support a in-Makefile verbositiy
switch. So we use cmake --build as a fall back to extract the
CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE property and pass it as an optional
-v argument to Ninja.
Thanks for working on this.
+
Kim Rydhof Thor Hansen wrote:
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/prop_tgt/AUTOGEN_TARGET_DEPENDS.html
I have a similar problem because automoc doesn't pick up that my
metadata.json file is a dependency to the generated moc_plugin.cpp
when building a Qt plugin
Thanks for the testcase. I
Brad King wrote:
On 02/24/2015 05:25 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Until that problem is solved we cannot make object libraries
implicitly offer their objects just through tll().
Honestly, the problem is still not clear to me.
Consider an object library with some usage requirements:
Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 22:57:13 +0100, Stephen Kelly wrote:
What I envision for the future is:
add_library(objlib OBJECT ...)
target_compile_definitions(objlib PUBLIC MYDEF)
target_sources(objlib INTERFACE $TARGET_OBJECTS:objlib)
Do you envision that as the
Actually, scratch my last comment and submodules. There looks to be a
GIT_SUBMODULES option that says if not given, all submodules will be
updated. I am assuming that means the CMake passes in the --recursive
option automatically when cloning. Haven't tested it yet though...
-Caleb
On Wed, Feb
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 22:57:13 +0100, Stephen Kelly wrote:
What I envision for the future is:
add_library(objlib OBJECT ...)
target_compile_definitions(objlib PUBLIC MYDEF)
target_sources(objlib INTERFACE $TARGET_OBJECTS:objlib)
Do you envision that as the idiomatic way to
Thanks for the Answer!
I actually do not want to alter CMake in any way (and I don't want to
create a custom cmake executable) if possible. load_command would have
been perfekt.
I am losing alot of performance in my map_set() map_get() etc functions
which translate down to
Miklos,
I did a quick test and using the DOWNLOAD_COMMAND option to
ExternalProject_Add works nicely:
ExternalProject_Add(sfml
PREFIX ${sfml_PREFIX}
DOWNLOAD_COMMAND git clone --depth 1
https://github.com/LaurentGomila/SFML.git
INSTALL_DIR ${sfml_INSTALL_DIR}
CMAKE_ARGS
On 02/25/2015 12:50 AM, Dmytro Poplavskiy wrote:
I have some source files generated as a part of build process, generated
using add_custom_command().
Building works fine, but would be nice to have generated source files to
be displayed in IDE project (QtCreator using CodeBlocks generator).
I'd
Ben Boeckel wrote:
It is just as easy to get into this situation when linking static
libraries, right? Object libraries are not part of the problem, right? Or
could you post a sscce?
It is, so maybe it's less of an issue. I just think it is much easier to
stumble upon it when you start
That's great, I will try that.
Thanks very much,
Miklos
On 25 February 2015 at 23:32, J. Caleb Wherry calebwhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Miklos,
I did a quick test and using the DOWNLOAD_COMMAND option to
ExternalProject_Add works nicely:
ExternalProject_Add(sfml
PREFIX ${sfml_PREFIX}
20150225)
+set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20150226)
#set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1)
---
Summary of changes:
Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
hooks/post-receive
--
CMake
Hi
I've been working on an open source project which provides alot of extra
cmake (in pure cmake) https://github.com/toeb/cmakepp. I am however
hitting a performance bottleneck and want to get around that by using
load_command (I know it is discouraged) however I have the problem that it
is not
mkdir build-d
cd build-d
cmake
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=out ../your/source/procject
cmake --build .
cd ..
mkdir build-r
cd build-r
cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=out
../your/source/procject
cmake --build . --target install
cd ..
On Wed, Feb 25,
Hi all,
Is there any chance that the version compatibility matrix will be
updated for cmake 3.x features?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
attachment: loose.vcf--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware
Hi Brad,
Thanks, I started addressing the issues, hopefully I will finish today. Is it
ok if I rebase on 1416d21?
Best,
Raffi
On 23 Feb 2015, at 18:54, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
Hi Raffi,
Your matlab-enabled nightly builds have been clean for a few days on all
the
Thanks for your reply.
I'm not sure I follow your answer. I do delete the directory each time I
build, but I'm still not understanding how you're building release or debug
versions to begin with.
I'm just automatically getting Release, unless I edit CMakeCache.txt after
I've built once.
I just
Thanks for answering Brad, I appreciate it.
- Radjino
From: Brad King [brad.k...@kitware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 4:27 PM
To: Radjino Bholanath
Cc: cmake-developers@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] Questions about code reviews and
When generating Xcode projects on OSX, for larger projects I get this error
when I attempt to open them (smaller/simpler ones seem to be ok).
In one particular example the Xcode generated project is approx 14MB in size.
Does anyone know of any tools to diagnose what is wrong with the generated
I extracted .zip with WinRAR.
Since you said extracting the .zip is expected to work,I uninstall CMake
and extracting the .zip again. It's works well this time.
No only that, I've done the same thing(extracting and run directly) on
another clean machine,it also works well.
It's strange,right?
62 matches
Mail list logo
