> My motivation is this. I want to submit a few improvements to the way CPack
> writes config files, starting with that cpack_set_if_not_set change I
> mentioned a while back. This functionality is generator-independent (and
> basically unrelated to actual package generation), so I thought
>
Thanks for the suggestions, Brad. Here is a set of three patches that
breaks out the changes. For the HDF5_PREFER_PARALLEL implementation, I now
use a list to set the names for find_program which does look much cleaner.
I agree that having a NAMES_PER_DIR for find_program would be simpler from
the
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via cf3138b2ec9150f33bf1fc9c5893a3b8135f8605 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 203306cfc18d29686c6f6742d7960356c044438d (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 71dd6bfbbdcc4a91322ae233021c91d6899c2691 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 5ce9fe1efde6b17acdd0b3ae1dac0b65c0254893 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via b104667b9132bdc13fe42bde140378d579bfb3e6 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 70c864ae8ffec43956e751a2ab600862b4fdac7d (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 1bc2c6d2dadfbbedb7dee9a2d2f2baa830866d13 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via b53baca15b6531a1f4c68f8bdbd1bdf10bc1ec94 (commit)
via
Hi,
did you really enable parallel compiling in VS with /MP24 or the like? Note
that using devenv to build uses the number from the IDE user settings but using
msbuild needs a command line option.
Else just create a custom target that calls cmake for ninja and afterwards
ninja itself in yet
El 31/08/15 a las 11:35, Guillaume Dumont escribió:
Hi all,
Using ninja is especially useful for projects with a lot of CUDA files
which are built sequentially for every target using MSVS.
I would like to contribute but I don't really know where to start and
if such an effort already
@Hendrik Sattler
I have not experimented with the /MP flag that much, but this won't solve
my problem when the project contains a lot of CUDA files. The /MP flag as
not effect there.
Yes I could indeed create a custom build target and create additional build
trees to build using ninja in there
On Monday, August 17, 2015 09:15:18 Michael Jackson wrote:
> I thought there used to be a DocBook version of the documentation? At one
> point I had an XML parser that used that as input to process the
> documentation in the same way.
the way the documentation is generated has changed with
On Friday, August 28, 2015 08:23:47 Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm curious about when CMake decides to link a library by its absolute path
> and when it links using the `-l*` syntax. I came across this for the very
> simple test problem
> ```
> cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.0)
>
Today is the 15th birthday of CMake:
http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/959
Thanks to everyone that has used and contributed to CMake over the years!
-Bill
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware
Hi, guys.
It looks that an error ‘ld.bfd.exe: cannot find -l-Wl,-Bdynamic’
was introduced by
commit 675ef165f213a6db1f9d0dfbebf6a0afc5469494
Author: Chuck Atkins
Date: Fri Aug 7 15:11:57 2015 -0400
Allow LINK_SEARCH_{START,END}_STATIC props to have default values.
On 08/31/2015 11:16 AM, Mikhail Filimonov wrote:
> It looks that an error ‘ld.bfd.exe: cannot find -l-Wl,-Bdynamic’
>
> was introduced by
>
> commit 675ef165f213a6db1f9d0dfbebf6a0afc5469494
I discovered that problem in unrelated work last week and had prepared
a commit to revert it. Chuck and
On 08/28/2015 05:37 PM, Michael Scott wrote:
> Okay, I've modified the patch to only add the DEBUG and RELEASE
> configurations when the corresponding library is found, and not set the
> generic IMPORTED_LOCATION property at all.
Thanks. We also need to be compatible with projects or scripts
On 08/31/2015 04:47 AM, Paul Romano wrote:
> I'd like to offer the attached patch for consideration
Thanks for working on these changes.
Please split each independent fix out into its own commit with
corresponding commit message explaining the change.
For the HDF5_PREFER_PARALLEL
On 08/31/2015 07:36 AM, "Roman Wüger" wrote:
> Attached you will find the corrected patch.
Thanks. I've attached a revised version. I renamed the options
and added release notes. I also started the test case. Please
try completing the test and getting it to pass from there.
BTW, I noticed
On 08/31/2015 09:35 AM, Kislinskiy, Stefan wrote:
> As there is already a patch for such a genex in bug 15509 and the
> discussion in 5939 (both linked below in Brad's reply) started 7
> years ago... It would be a great pity to let this issue seep away
> again. What can I do to help fixing this
So, from what I can tell, the Visual Studio generator and Xcode generator
don't even use the CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_LINK__FLAGS. I know it's the
generators and not platforms since my tests pass on these platforms with
Makefile and Ninja generators but fail with Visual Studio and Xcode
generators.
On 08/31/2015 03:44 PM, Chuck Atkins wrote:
> the Visual Studio generator and Xcode generator
> don't even use the CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_LINK__FLAGS
This is likely true and has not been noticed because the
Platform modules do not set any value for this variable
on any platform supported by those
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15722
==
Reported By:Kevin Godby
Assigned To:
On 08/30/2015 06:41 PM, Gilles Khouzam wrote:
> http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15670
> Add support for setting "Windows target platform version" in VS2015
Most of your changes look good but I think this issue needs more
discussion. There is already some discussion in the issue tracker
Today is the 15th birthday of CMake:
http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/959
Thanks to everyone that has used and contributed to CMake over the years!
-Bill
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware
Commit 899458ab ("Tests: Cover NO_SONAME property for SHARED libraries")
introduced a few new ExportImport tests, and the
check_lib_{no}soname.cmake scripts that parse readelf(1)'s output.
Make the regular expression matching the SONAME line output by readelf
less strict, as the output format
Hi Brad,
sorry for the long response time, but I was on vacation.
Attached you will find the corrected patch.
Best regards
Roman
Am 20.08.15 um 17:30 schrieb Brad King
> On 08/20/2015 06:30 AM, Roman Wüger wrote:
>
> > I made the "atoi" change but my problem is the test itself.
>
> > I
I'd like to offer the attached patch for consideration that fixes a number
of issues with FindHDF5.cmake. The issues are as follows:
1. Searching for libraries related to the HL and Fortran_HL components is a
bit broken at the moment; for example, if you specify the Fortran_HL
component,
_VERSION_MINOR 3)
-set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20150831)
+set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20150901)
#set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1)
---
Summary of changes:
Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
hooks/
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via cb09b3a0ea2bacd67523ebd85af6890b674caea8 (commit)
via
Steve,
The topic merged here:
Merge topic 'refactor-progress'
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=2985b9c0
sometimes breaks "make" progress. So far I've only been able to
reproduce this when building CMake itself. In an up-to-date build
tree I get output like:
$ make
...
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
https://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15721
==
Reported By:Thomas Ruschival
Assigned To:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 9a6d7d2e5484fb75aa3aea2ad5d981cf699bfd25 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via d01e3c31c9027983663918d5cbcba2a61aeb2f9f (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 97db5c567894c253173ab45c919925ce010ab05e (commit)
via
Hi all,
I would like to know what kind of effort would it take to generate a Visual
Studio generator that bypasses the normal MSBuild build and uses Ninja
instead. I have been working on different projects which build much faster
with ninja than MSBuild (several orders of magnitude on a machine
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 352e8e95b65e19cca10b4aec0c626787dfbb1ba1 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 5f6718c003dce82a64b7fee6e3cd95ecfc11548b (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 08ae6ced4d5bbdb536a79e561eed54b28ae56836 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 2af56500e8be3074ebb58060909d070b2557e17a (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 51d7a7bb3f03b3562c8ca82ddfefcc5185dc2455 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via e18f6fe276ea3ca576bb5f8fb910a6532280d900 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via f83cd172f23d35bdf2552dfcc781914f7b46e968 (commit)
via
As there is already a patch for such a genex in bug 15509 and the discussion in
5939 (both linked below in Brad's reply) started 7 years ago... It would be a
great pity to let this issue seep away again. What can I do to help fixing this
finally?
Stefan
-Original Message-
From:
46 matches
Mail list logo