Hello dear CMake users!Anybody use Dear ImGui project?Please help to review PR for add CMake support:https://github.com/ocornut/imgui/pull/1713Have a nice day!
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware
t a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
index 3734784..c8cecc0 100644
--- a/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
+++ b/Source/CMakeVersion.cmake
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# CMake version number components.
set(CMake_VERSION_MAJOR 3)
set(CMake_VERSION_MINOR 12)
-set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20180702)
+set(CMake_VER
So, it seems it is not possible to have CMake NOT to use absolute paths
Quote
“CMake does always use absolute paths. It's part of the concept.”
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45856955/how-to-tell-cmake-to-use-relative-paths
One use case:
1) I have a Cmake script and I generate a Visual
I have QT 5.11.1 installed, I used the open source installer. It did
install msvc2015 32-bit libs but not 2017. Google search shows that
2015 is ABI compatible so CMake should use that.
When I generate the CMake project, it says it can't find QT version
4.x. How do I build CMake with the GUI
You need a binary CMake to compile CMake from source code. `apt-get install
cmake` should be more appropriate here...
Btw, CMake 2.8 is a pretty old version. If possible, you should use CMake
>= 3.0.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 9:39 AM canny georgina wrote:
> Dear all,
> I've been trying to use a
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 8ad33961582bd0a70bf8226558c28fb3829b99a7 (commit)
via
Thanks!
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 at 16:40, Brad King wrote:
> On 07/02/2018 08:43 AM, Robert Maynard wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 6:18 PM Miklos Espak wrote:
> >> the 'ccmake' command seems to be missing from the linux tarballs
> >> from 3.12.0 RC1 and RC2. Not sure if you are aware of that.
> >
On 07/02/2018 08:43 AM, Robert Maynard wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 6:18 PM Miklos Espak wrote:
>> the 'ccmake' command seems to be missing from the linux tarballs
>> from 3.12.0 RC1 and RC2. Not sure if you are aware of that.
>
> Thanks for reporting this. I am looking into it.
Thanks for the
In Visual Studio, I can add *.ico files to my C# project and in the
CSPROJ XML, it shows up as a element. Is this supported in
CMake for CSharp targets?
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers
Hello!
Did you try just to install CMake in your virtual machine?
Best regards,
Innokentiy Alaytsev
--
Sent from: http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers
Dear all,
I've been trying to use a factorization software (CADO-NFS), before I
can use it, I need to compile it, but in order to successfully compile
it, i need Cmake as pre requirement (CADO-NFS developer said that it's
mandatory to have it (Cmake) perfectly installed and compiled). When i
try
> Users of the old function cannot use the new syntax in older cmake versions
The new cmake_minimum_required syntax of MIN...POLICY_MAX is entirely
backwards compatible and will just be ignored by cmake < 3.12.
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 1:14 AM Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>
> It would actually make
Thanks for reporting this. I am looking into it.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 6:18 PM Miklos Espak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the 'ccmake' command seems to be missing from the linux tarballs from 3.12.0
> RC1 and RC2. Not sure if you are aware of that.
>
> The release notes does not mention that it should be
Hi,
Just giving my 2 cents:
If the preferred solution is the "POLICY_NEW_UNTIL" wording, then why not make
this accepted as well? This way, you can deprecate the backwards-compatible
version in a few years and remove it some time thereafter. In the end, you'll
get a cleaner solution...
Hi,
I (and someone else) stumbled upon a problem when using the Azure IOTHUB
SDK for C on a Linux platform using cmake 3.10+:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-iot-sdk-c/issues/505
The problem seems to be triggered by having two .def-files as
add_library()-source-files.
During the build cmake
FYI: Starting with CMake 3.11, it is now possible to define an alias of an
imported target.
Le lun. 2 juil. 2018 à 09:27, Petr Kmoch a écrit :
> Hi Bram.
>
> Wild idea: could you also define a non-namespaced target `foo` and craft
> it such that linking against it generates a linker warning?
Hi Bram.
Wild idea: could you also define a non-namespaced target `foo` and craft it
such that linking against it generates a linker warning? Something like
"Warning: symbol `Using_just_foo_is_deprecated_use_Foo_foo_instead` defined
twice, ignoring weak definition."
Petr
On 2 July 2018 at
17 matches
Mail list logo