Andre,
We have seen that on all our cygwin machines (32 and 64 bit) running on
Windows 7 as well. This was on the latest update to cygwin and cmake 2.8.9.
We had 2.8.6 running before and did not experience these BAD COMMAND errors.
(Did get some random timeout errors though).
I've tried
The regex check for version of java does not find the version.
My system reports java -version as:
java version 1.7.0_b147-icedtea
I changed line 110-113:
IF(var MATCHES java version \[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+\\.[0-9_.]+[oem-]*\.*)
# This is most likely Sun / OpenJDK, or maybe
need to disect the INSTALL
command?
I like the;
set(CMAKE_JAVA_MANIFEST mymanifest.mf)
option for manifests since they are more specific to java jar files.
On Thursday 20 October 2011 11:59:05 Allen D Byrne wrote:
I've upgraded my Java project to the latest 2.8.6 release. The only thing
I needed to change the UseJava.cmake script to allow INSTALL components and to
have more flexible locations for JAR resource files.
In addition I needed to change the java_copy_file function to use the
execute_process command.
Attached is the diff for my changes, hoping the correct folks will
I have finally successfully compiled our library and tests on Win7 with mpich2.
However I had to make the following changes in FindMPI.cmake starting at line
409. I added the fortran block and removed the quotes from the
set(MPI_LIBRARIES_WORK ...) commands. The qoutes really messed up VS
I've upgraded my Java project to the latest 2.8.6 release. The only thing
missing for me is to allow components on the install commands.
I just did the following:
In UseJava.cmake (same for INSTALL_JNI_SYMLINK):
function(INSTALL_JAR _TARGET_NAME _DESTINATION)
get_property(__FILES
David,
Results so far:
MemCheck with 2.8.4 - CDash does not display DynamicAnalysis data
MemoryCheck with 2.8.3 displayed same issue
The DynamicAnalysis_xxx.log files have the data.
The DynamicAnalysis_xxx.xml files have the test data, but the Log tags data
looks encyrpted.
We will rerun with
Further results:
2.8.2 works with MemoryCheck
2.8.4 does not display even with MemoryCheck.
Here is out CTestConfig.cmake file:
#
SET (CTEST_PROJECT_NAME HDF5.1.8)
SET (CTEST_NIGHTLY_START_TIME 20:00:00 CST)
SET (CTEST_DROP_METHOD http)
SET
, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Allen D Byrne b...@hdfgroup.org wrote:
Further results:
2.8.2 works with MemoryCheck
2.8.4 does not display even with MemoryCheck.
Here is out CTestConfig.cmake file:
#
SET (CTEST_PROJECT_NAME HDF5.1.8)
SET
build
steps, and not submitting it.
I will investigate when this changed and why, but for now, hopefully
that can get you going without completely revamping your scripts.
HTH,
David
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Allen D Byrne b...@hdfgroup.org wrote:
The question is: Has anyone
One more detail, this seems to be a problem only on non windows (non-make) -
windows VS machines ran the tests in correct declaration order.
Allen
Bug reported:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11877
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
I just installed 2.8.4 and on my fedora 14 linux box the ctest -D Experimental
stage decided to run the tests in some unknown to me order. The previous
versions always ran them in order of definition. Any thing I can do to get the
ordering back?
Allen
:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Allen D Byrne b...@hdfgroup.org wrote:
I just installed 2.8.4 and on my fedora 14 linux box the ctest -D
Experimental stage decided to run the tests in some unknown to me order.
The
previous versions always ran them in order of definition. Any thing I can
do
Just using standard gcc/gfortran on the fedora distro. It is the 64bit version?
You can grab one of our recent src tarballs from
http://www.hdfgroup.org/ftp/HDF5/hdf5-1.8.6/;
Allen
PS. I will be out of touch for the next 36 hours
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Allen D Byrne b...@hdfgroup.org
and not
CMAKE_JAVA_CLASS_OUTPUT_PATH.
For the resurce files, since the add_jar already copies the files I just added
a prefix parameter for resource files. A bit brute force but effective.
Allen
On Saturday 05 February 2011 16:04:15 Allen D Byrne wrote:
Yes! That is where I meant! (dang email doesn't
Yes! That is where I meant! (dang email doesn't read minds properly:)
BTW, I have a problem I couldn't fix. When doing an add_jar with source in the
current dir and resource files (image files) in a sub-directory, the resource
files in the jar are at the class base instead of below.
Example;
Andreas,
The problem is a CMake issue with how ';' is interpreted. In the
USE_JAVA.CMAKE file (lines 227-243):
if (_JAVA_COMPILE_FILES)
# Compile the java files and create a list of class files
add_custom_command(
TARGET ${_TARGET_NAME}
COMMAND
While Marcus states what is likely the preferred way, I just added an
ADD_DEPENDENCIES(internal_target external_target) statement that seems to
always work?
Allen
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:23:52 -0500
From: Marcus D. Hanwell marcus.hanw...@kitware.com
Subject: Re: [CMake] How to have a
OK, I got past my JNI issue (must set java version number) - except now I have
a problem with the classpath for building the java files only on windows! On
linux everyone's happy. On windows, using VS2008, the classpath in the project
files have been converted from ';' to spaces?
Any ideas?
I will try it tomorrow, when the machines are idle.
Thanks,
Allen
On 11/09/2010 08:03 AM, Brad King wrote:
I think this regression was an existing bug that was exposed
by the other fix.
It was, and here is the fix to the exposed bug:
Friday I upgraded my windows VS2008 and IVF111 machines to cmake 2.8.3. Over
the weekend they all failed to configure with fortran :
-- Check for working Fortran compiler using: Visual Studio 9 2008 -- broken
CMake Error at C:/Program Files/CMake
.
Now you are a happy bunny and can compile using the IDE if desired - or skip
C and use nmake
JB
From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of
Allen D Byrne
Sent: 08 November 2010 16:18
To: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: [CMake] 2.8.3 fortran regression
Preprocess=preprocessYes instead of
Taking out the new AdditionalOptions= /W1 /libs:dll /threads allowed the
project to succeed.
Allen
On 11/8/2010 1:15 PM, Allen D Byrne wrote:
This did work before the update - and reinstalling cmake 2.8.2 worked. BTW,
I uninstalled and deleted the CMake
I have a test script where I pass a list of arguments in through a variable -
TEST_ARGS. No problems until I need to pass in a parameter with an equal sign:
TEST_ARGS=v;-param1;-parm2=5;--param3
An equal sign anywhere in the list wipes the entire list of arguments and
TEST_ARGS is then
I found the answer to my problem in bug 0009214 : -D option can't use value
with equals sign
The trick is to qualify the tag with STRING;
TEST_ARGS:STRING=v;-param1;-parm2=5;--param3
Everything is working for now.
Allen
I have a test script where I pass a list of arguments in through
As stated in my previous post, I have a script, named runTest.cmake, which
works on linux but fails on Windows with:
The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another
process
This script calls execute_process() with an executable to capture the output
for a comparison
Well it turns out the problem was in the execute_process script. I had the :
OUTPUT_FILE ${TEST_OUTPUT}
ERROR_FILE ${TEST_OUTPUT}
both going to one file - Windows couldn't handle that. Changing that allowed
the command to actually execute,
NOW, I have to deal with the CRLF issue
27 matches
Mail list logo
