El mar., 9 feb. 2016 a las 11:13, Rolf Eike Beer (<e...@sf-mail.de>)
escribió:
> Am 09.02.2016 11:10, schrieb Antonio Pérez Barrero:
> >>
> >> On 02/08/2016 04:24 PM, Antonio Pérez Barrero wrote:
> >> > Yes, it is possible, but currently it's n
>
> > + math(EXPR Protobuf_MAJOR_VERSION "${Protobuf_VERSION} / 100")
> > + math(EXPR Protobuf_MINOR_VERSION "${Protobuf_VERSION} / 1000 % 1000")
> > + math(EXPR Protobuf_SUBMINOR_VERSION "${Protobuf_VERSION} % 1000")
>
> Would string manipulation be better here?
I don't know how to make
>
> On 02/08/2016 04:24 PM, Antonio Pérez Barrero wrote:
> > Yes, it is possible, but currently it's not looking for the debug
> > library with a different name, just in a different path that is
> > unlikely to exist in a Unix system.
>
> The fact that a s
Hi,
thanks for feedback, I'll rework the patch. I was planning to actually
submit three patches covering the following:
* Version checking
* Interface variables rename, keeping backwards compatibility.
* Fix a bug when setting Protobuf_LIBRARIES on Un*x systems.
So what's the best way to submit
El lun., 8 feb. 2016 a las 19:28, Brad King ()
escribió:
> On 02/08/2016 11:47 AM, Antonio Perez Barrero wrote:
> > Avoid looking for debug library unless configuring for MSVC.
> [snip]
> > - find_library(${name}_LIBRARY_DEBUG
> > - NAMES ${filename}
> > -