[CMake] MSVC10 redistributable issue

2013-05-02 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, I tried to install the following redistributable package after seeing the issue below, but it did not help, not even after a reboot. Got a clue? Laszlo = -- Building for: Visual Studio 10 -- The C compiler identification is MSVC 16.0.30319.1 -- The CXX compiler

Re: [CMake] MSVC10 redistributable issue

2013-05-02 Thread Laszlo Papp
How can I solve this issue with cmake from command line? On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:51 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Hi, I tried to install the following redistributable package after seeing the issue below

[cmake-developers] Suggestion: CMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE warning improvement

2013-04-09 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, Just found this post from Brad: http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2011-February/042556.html I would suggest to improve the warning message. It is not exactly clear why that happens to a user like me. Laszlo -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-03-18 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Florian Reinhard florian.reinh...@googlemail.com wrote: In addition compilers upto 7.2 did not support anything else than coff abi. So i don't see any valid reason to add --abi=eabi. Even more you usually set your silicon for improved optimizer results with

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-03-18 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Florian Reinhard florian.reinh...@googlemail.com wrote: I still don't see that this is a valid reason to break things for others. There is no any breakage. Qt has never been used with the TI toolchain. ABI will be required from the start of the support.

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-03-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: Please verify that it works, so I can still get it into 2.8.11 hopefully. I just realized that the cmake files use the default ABI type which is still the legacy COFF, and not EABI. That is a bit unfortunate

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-03-15 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Florian Reinhard florian.reinh...@googlemail.com wrote: I'm testing the next branch at the moment. Changes i noticed: setting the following options is no longer required (yay!): SET (CMAKE_C_COMPILER_WORKS 1) SET (CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_WORKS 1) #skip ABI

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-03-14 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Florian Reinhard florian.reinh...@googlemail.com wrote: If ARM and DSP toolchain are commandline compatible, there could be an option to specify the architecture, like C6000 (DSP core in OMAP processors), C2000, C6400 which map to the correct

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-03-14 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: the TI_DSP_to_TI branch on cmake stage now tries to automatically detect the compiler prefix and suffix and searches ar and strip accordingly. It seems to work for me (but I can't run the binaries). Please

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-03-14 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: On Thursday 14 March 2013, Robert Maynard wrote: I am sorry I was incorrect. The changes made to close bug 12405 are going to be in RC1. These new changes aren't going to make RC1 but should be in RC2 if we

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-03-13 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, it would be great if you could give the branch TI_DSP_to_TI on cmake stage ( http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git ) a try. It renames TI_DSP to TI, and searches for ar6x and strip6x. The binaries

[cmake-developers] Modules/Compiler: TI DSP/ARM

2013-03-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, I would like to note that the TI-DSP-ASM/C/CXX.cmake files would look like exactly the same for TI-ARM-ASM/C/CXX.cmake. The interface is the same for both toolchains. I presume you can just remove the DSP in there from the file name (or in worse case, add an arm overload)?

Re: [cmake-developers] Modules/Compiler: TI DSP/ARM

2013-03-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote: oh, this is working for you too ? Cool :-) I have not tried yet, but I know both toolchains now. They use the same interface. They only have different backend implementations as far as I can tell. Do you know for

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-02-27 Thread Laszlo Papp
Anyone knowing something about this? Issue still not solved. :-) Laszlo -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-02-25 Thread Laszlo Papp
to *force* the compiler: It would be nice to have a bit more thorough documentation. This is not yet clear to me if it applies against my scenario or I can avoid forcing. Anyone knowing something about this? On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Here you can find

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-02-24 Thread Laszlo Papp
Here you can find the toolchain file I created: https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/mobile/wiki-reader/repository/revisions/master/entry/frontends/blackberry/cmake/Toolchain-C6X.cmake I think the issue boils down to this: root /home/lpapp/Projects/qt/skeleton/build #

Re: [CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-02-23 Thread Laszlo Papp
Oh, I might need to use the --run_linker (or --compile_only tentatively at least) argument for the compiler. I will try that with CMAKE_C(XX)_COMPILER_ARG1. Apologize for the noise. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Hi, I am now trying to put a toolchain file

[CMake] Toolchain file: Texas Instrument C6000 Code Generation Tools

2013-02-22 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, I am now trying to put a toolchain file together for the aforementioned embedded environment on my Windows 7 workstation. You can see the file contents I have, and the errors I get below. When I just use the compiler against the one liner main.c, it works off hand. I also tried to force the

Re: [CMake] Using Qt5 with cmake

2013-01-18 Thread Laszlo Papp
What is wrong about Stephen's post? It has been working for me in several projects. On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Bogdan Cristea crist...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Qt5 provides configuration files for cmake, but I haven't yet found a way to detect Qt5 as recommended in this post (I am using qt5

Re: [CMake] Using Qt5 with cmake

2013-01-18 Thread Laszlo Papp
vendredi 18 janvier 2013 à 15:22 +, Laszlo Papp a écrit : What is wrong about Stephen's post? It has been working for me in several projects. A line like this find_package(Qt5Declarative) generates a warning about missing FindQt5Declarative.cmake which is not provided by Qt5 nor cmake

Re: [CMake] Implicit toolchain file usage

2013-01-18 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: On Thursday 17 January 2013, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: do you mean using -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=qnx should trigger something

Re: [CMake] Segfault for the Blackberry 10 build (devalpha device)

2013-01-17 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote: On 1/16/2013 6:57 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: This is my latest toolchain file version: http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=**scratch%2Flpapp%2Fwikireader.**gita=blobh= **5c6c4dbda324a8285f99115c3de7d4**5e441d47cahb

[CMake] Implicit toolchain file usage

2013-01-17 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, I have been pondering for a while if it was possible (theoritically, and then practically) to get the toolchain fine defined inside one (main?) of the cmake files? I have been using the -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=my-toolchain-file.cmake option, but I think this can become duplicated easily. That

Re: [CMake] Implicit toolchain file usage

2013-01-17 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: do you mean using -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=qnx should trigger something ? Don't know, my experience is that cross compiling environments usually vary a lot in their setup. *Current* cmake

[CMake] Segfault for the Blackberry 10 build (devalpha device)

2013-01-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi all, As I have a few days left for the submission of the limited edition device program, I thought I would be asking for help to see if it is something simple to fix with joint effort as I like cmake. :-) Otherwise I may need to switch away from cmake, and it will also be a showstopper to

Re: [CMake] Segfault for the Blackberry 10 build (devalpha device)

2013-01-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Here you can find the build with qmake: http://paste.kde.org/~lpapp/648440/ Sorry, I sent a wrong link for that. This is the correct: http://pastebin.com/h4HjDFzU Here you can also find my cmake toolchain file: http

Re: [CMake] Segfault for the Blackberry 10 build (devalpha device)

2013-01-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
Interesting finding! It happened to PySide as well on this platform which may help with proceeding: http://www.engcorp.com/pipermail/blackberry-python/2013/16.html On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: I have just tried to add the following libraries

Re: [CMake] Segfault for the Blackberry 10 build (devalpha device)

2013-01-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Interesting finding! It happened to PySide as well on this platform which may help with proceeding: http://www.engcorp.com/pipermail/blackberry-python/2013/16.html On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: I have just tried to add

Re: [CMake] Segfault for the Blackberry 10 build (devalpha device)

2013-01-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
: On 1/16/2013 4:05 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: At least I cannot reproduce the crash with the following skeleton: You should look at the compile/link lines. First I would look at the link lines: This is the qmake one: qcc -Vgcc_ntoarmv7le -lang-c++ -Wl,-rpath-link,/home/taylor/** Development

Re: [CMake] Segfault for the Blackberry 10 build (devalpha device)

2013-01-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
achieve, but the CMAKE_C(XX)_FLAGS* do not seem to work as I would expect them to. On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Hi Bill! This works: echo int main() { return 0; } main.cpp qcc -Vgcc_ntoarmv7le main.cpp -l QtCore -L /opt/bbndk/target_10_0_9_1673/qnx6/armle

[cmake-developers] FindOpenGLES.cmake upstreaming?

2012-12-04 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, Does anyone feel like grabbing one of the module codes out there, and put into an upcoming cmake release? It is nowadays somewhat a standard to provide opengles support as well for the project if that otherwise supports OpenGL. They become to be going hand in hand lately more and more in my

Re: [CMake] Automoc4 issue when using cmake (2.8.9)

2012-11-03 Thread Laszlo Papp
The issue still persists! I wonder if anybody had an idea? Laszlo On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Any ideas? Laszlo On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Seems those variables are empty: -- Looking for _POSIX_TIMERS - found

Re: [CMake] JOM Makefile generation issue

2012-10-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: It seems I was the culsprit with writing my python script as I essentially used -G\foo bar\. Having dropped the inner quotes, it worked. However, I am now getting strange errors that I have not seen before. :) -- Detecting C compiler ABI info CMake Error

Re: [CMake] JOM Makefile generation issue

2012-10-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
2008. Any help is still welcome. :-) Laszlo On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: This is the python statement I am trying to execute on my Windows box just in case: subprocess.call([cmake, -GNMake Makefiles JOM, -DCMAKE_MODULE_PATH= + os.environ[CMAKE_MODULE_PATH

Re: [CMake] JOM Makefile generation issue

2012-10-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
Does CMake work from the command line without python on a simple project? No. Does it work with nmake or any other generators? No. Laszlo -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages

Re: [CMake] JOM Makefile generation issue

2012-10-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
I think it is my stupidity again as usual. :D $myrepository/tools/bin/cl.exe caused it because that was found due to a wrong PATH handling. I have inserted that before the rest instead of appending. The local cl.exe was preferred from the repository and cmake seems to have been unhappy about that

[CMake] JOM Makefile generation issue

2012-10-30 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, I am trying to replace a Windows batch script with a python variant, but I am getting some issues when calling cmake as a subprocess: CMake Error: Could not create named generator NMake Makefiles JOM I have tried to use the --debug-output and --trace options as well, but it did not get me

Re: [CMake] JOM Makefile generation issue

2012-10-30 Thread Laszlo Papp
, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: On 10/30/2012 10:54 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote: I am trying to replace a Windows batch script with a python variant, but I am getting some issues when calling cmake as a subprocess: CMake Error: Could not create named generator NMake Makefiles JOM What

Re: [CMake] Automoc4 issue when using cmake (2.8.9)

2012-10-01 Thread Laszlo Papp
Any ideas? Laszlo On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Seems those variables are empty: -- Looking for _POSIX_TIMERS - found CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH: CMAKE_MODULE_PATH: CMake Error at /usr/share/apps/cmake/modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:198 (MESSAGE

Re: [CMake] Automoc4 issue when using cmake (2.8.9)

2012-09-27 Thread Laszlo Papp
) CMakeLists.txt:31 (find_package) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! Laszlo On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: On Wednesday 26 September 2012, Laszlo Papp wrote: do you know what changed couple dof days ago ? Did you use an older version

Re: [CMake] Automoc4 issue when using cmake (2.8.9)

2012-09-25 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Laszlo Papp wrote: Hi, Worked couple of days ago. Help welcome. Laszlo -- Found Threads: TRUE -- Found OpenSSL: /usr/lib/libssl.so -- Looking for _POSIX_TIMERS

Re: [CMake] Automoc4 issue when using cmake (2.8.9)

2012-09-25 Thread Laszlo Papp
4.9.1-1 Laszlo On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: CMakeLists.txt cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8) project(test) add_executable(test main.cpp) #find_package(Automoc4 REQUIRED) find_package(KDE4 REQUIRED) main.cpp int main() {return 0;} Command

[CMake] Automoc4 issue when using cmake (2.8.9)

2012-09-24 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, Worked couple of days ago. Help welcome. Laszlo -- Found Threads: TRUE -- Found OpenSSL: /usr/lib/libssl.so -- Looking for _POSIX_TIMERS -- Looking for _POSIX_TIMERS - found CMake Error at /usr/share/apps/cmake/modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:198 (MESSAGE): Did not find

[cmake-developers] Find module for Python3

2012-04-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
the project also on Windows. I know we could use a local hack, but I am now also proposing to have that feature supported in upstream (cmake project) as well. What do you think ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com

Re: [cmake-developers] Find module for Python3

2012-04-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
That date is behind us. I would probably initiate the cmake update then in the KDE Windows project. Thank you in advance! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic

[CMake] Platform Finding modules

2011-11-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
which compilation unit to build (like the relevant standalone only for that given platform) and so on. Thank you in advance! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages

Re: [CMake] Issues with finding raptor in the soprano build

2011-11-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
, required is 2.0.4) Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe

Re: [CMake] Issues with finding raptor in the soprano build

2011-11-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
internally we should update it on Harmattan, but I have not found anybody really supporting this idea. :/ What would be the workaround for our environment ? Patch the FindRaptor.cmake file ? If yes, can someone give a hint, how ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other

Re: [CMake] Issues with finding raptor in the soprano build

2011-11-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
versions, too ? 1. Using the compatible old version everywhere, if possible ? 2. Keep local copies of such modules 3. Something else ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/16/2011 09:35 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote: What version

Re: [CMake] Issues with finding raptor in the soprano build

2011-11-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http

[CMake] Issues with finding raptor in the soprano build

2011-11-15 Thread Laszlo Papp
=c5043c8bef5306d847dae3bc511d18b2230ee453hb=1f6789719c53d964e2c8e705330e043dc04f2806f=cmake/modules/FindRaptor.cmake#154 Also: I have this file on my system: /usr/include/raptor2/raptor.h (That is the one the FindRaptor.cmake module is looking for iirc). Thank you in advance! I am now really stuck here. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

Re: [CMake] Issues with finding raptor in the soprano build

2011-11-15 Thread Laszlo Papp
.. :) Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe

Re: [CMake] Issues with finding raptor in the soprano build

2011-11-15 Thread Laszlo Papp
# Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http

Re: [CMake] Building a main.cpp containing a QObject subclass

2011-10-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
Thank you for your help Andreas. I have tried your approach. Please see the attached logs. The moc files are now somehow not generated. I might need to use qt4_wrap_cpp after all ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- The C compiler identification is GNU -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU -- Check

Re: [CMake] Building a main.cpp containing a QObject subclass

2011-10-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
I am now attaching the log about the following files: 1) CMakeLists.txt file 2) main.cpp 3) build log 4) moc_main.cxx Q_MOC_OUTPUT_REVISION is somehow not defined, but not sure why. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Andreas Pakulat ap...@gmx.de wrote: On 31.10.11 13

Re: [CMake] Building a main.cpp containing a QObject subclass

2011-10-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
(CMAKE_AUTOMOC ON) aborts the build: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::logic_error' what(): basic_string::_S_construct null not valid Aborted I have cmake version 2.8.6. installed. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source

Re: [CMake] Building a main.cpp containing a QObject subclass

2011-10-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
Okay: I got it working by using qt4_generate_moc :) I am not sure it is the cleanest way. Fixing the set(CMAKE_AUTOMOC ON) abort will probably the cleanest.. Thank you for your help again! :) Best Regards, Laszlo Papp cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8) include_directories

Re: [CMake] Building a main.cpp containing a QObject subclass

2011-10-31 Thread Laszlo Papp
Please add a bug in the cmake bug tracker for that: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/ David Faure has fixed it today, and the patch is probably in your inbox somewhere. :P Best Regards, Laszlo Papp -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com

Re: [CMake] CMAKE_ROOT issue in scratchbox, N9(50)

2011-08-09 Thread Laszlo Papp
to me. Could you please clarify ? Thank you! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ

Re: [CMake] Fwd: CPACK/NSIS: Subfolders/components related generation issue

2011-07-28 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, Thanks for you guys, it helped a lot. :) We now have a good installer for testing purposes. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

[CMake] Fwd: CPACK/NSIS: Subfolders/components related generation issue

2011-07-26 Thread Laszlo Papp
please ask for specific information from that file, if you need anything. Thank for your help in advance! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource

Re: [CMake] Fwd: CPACK/NSIS: Subfolders/components related generation issue

2011-07-26 Thread Laszlo Papp
${LIB_INSTALL_DIR} is properly used in the install lines. Any thought ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic

[CMake] Pass an array type argument to a macro

2011-07-19 Thread Laszlo Papp
macro. Is that possible ? Does it already somehow work like that ? Thank you in advance! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep

Re: [CMake] Pass an array type argument to a macro

2011-07-19 Thread Laszlo Papp
Thanks a lot, Eric and David ! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http

Re: [CMake] Multiple install section from the same base folder

2011-07-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
with install(DIRECTORY ... ) and exclude every non-header file (and possibly svn..) We have source, header, data, icon, et cetera files inside the given library folder, so this would cause more issues than benefit in our case. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

Re: [CMake] Multiple install section from the same base folder

2011-07-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
that ? That would result the easiest and cleanest way in my novice opinion. Is it possible to ask for such a feature ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource

Re: [CMake] Multiple install section from the same base folder

2011-07-12 Thread Laszlo Papp
}/gluon/player/lib COMPONENT Devel ) This way, it would be much cleaner and shorter to me. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please

Re: [CMake] QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND issue on N9(50)

2011-07-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
) macro, it works as expected. If I put that after, it does not. I guess this is the key here. I do not know those macros actually and I do not have time right now to look into their internal source, but that is the culsprit somehow. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

[CMake] Multiple install section from the same base folder

2011-07-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
it wrong and there is already a smarter cmake option for this ? I find it useful if there is just one section for those things, but if it is technically not possible or against the design, please let me know. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered

Re: [CMake] QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND issue on N9(50)

2011-07-10 Thread Laszlo Papp
}) if(QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND) add_subdirectory(touch) else(QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND) message(WARNING Qt installation lacks Qt Declarative - disabling touch based player) endif(QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND) Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

Re: [CMake] QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND issue on N9(50)

2011-07-08 Thread Laszlo Papp
the first occurence in the build order. Does cmake have some issue about using something like that more times on this platform ? Could you please investigate ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source

Re: [CMake] QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND issue on N9(50)

2011-07-08 Thread Laszlo Papp
I have just tried to update the cmake version manually from 2.8.2 to 2.8.4, but it did not help either. It really seems to be a weird bug on this platform. It works just find to use the macro and found line more times but N9. I am not sure what else I could try out... Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

[CMake] QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND issue on N9(50)

2011-07-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
, but I would like to find the root cause of the issue. Any help is welcome and thank you in advance! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Re: [CMake] QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND issue on N9(50)

2011-07-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
- libQtDeclarative.so.4.7.4 Even the file where this /usr/lib/libQtDeclarative.so points to: ls -lda /usr/lib/libQtDeclarative.so.4.7.4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lpapp lpapp 3406200 Jun 23 03:41 /usr/lib/libQtDeclarative.so.4.7.4 Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered

Re: [CMake] QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND issue on N9(50)

2011-07-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
below. Is it also a problem if you run cmake on a CMakeLists.txt file with just the following: find_package(Qt4) if(QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND)  message(found it) endif() Mmm, it is getting really weird because I get the found it message this way. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

Re: [CMake] QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND issue on N9(50)

2011-07-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
) +else(KDE4_FOUND) Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki

Re: [CMake] QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND issue on N9(50)

2011-07-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
Hi, Back to the simple CMakeLists.txt: find_package(Qt4) if(QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND)  message(found it) endif() find_package(Qt4) if(QT_QTDECLARATIVE_FOUND)  message(found it again) endif() Result: found it found it again Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

[CMake] CMAKE_ROOT issue in scratchbox, N9(50)

2011-07-05 Thread Laszlo Papp
help is welcome, thank you in advance! =) Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-08 Thread Laszlo Papp
My familiar did a package as an interim solution and let us see whether or not this version can be integrated into the 1.2 MeeGo release or just later. http://forum.meego.com/showthread.php?p=18810#post18810 Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Laszlo Papp djsz

Re: [CMake] CMake hanging when run inside QEmu

2011-03-08 Thread Laszlo Papp
Was discussed on #meego-arm. Nokia and other professionals are heavily working on this issue as far as it a qemu emulation issue, let us see. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us wrote: 1) What is the hackaround to install the newest version

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
Any progress on it ? One more information, this n900-devel image uses internally qemu and I am not sure that can cause any issue for the build system. That is also interesting why the debian packaging worked just fine in the scratchbox using also qemu internally. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/7 Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us: Any progress on it ? Nope. I won't be very responsive this week. That does not sound too good.. ! One more information, this n900-devel image uses internally

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
), but certianly not build anything. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us wrote: On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/7 Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us: Any progress on it ? Nope. I won't be very

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
Further news, I have just tried the rpm generation on my host system out and it worked like a charm, here are the logs: http://djszapi.homelinux.net/cpack_host.log http://djszapi.homelinux.net/gluon_host.spec I hope it helps with something... Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
is 2.8.3. But if it is fixed in 2.8.4, I wonder why you did not know it ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/7 Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us: As said, the working OBS spec files can be found here: http

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/8 Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us: Well: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11595 That is fixed in cmake 2.8.4. Changelog: http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2011-February/042839.html CPackRPM fix bug

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
in dl -- Looking for dlopen in dl - found -- Looking for process.h Nice, nice nothing, but stall here again... I would say it is a critical cmake BUG... Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us wrote: On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Eric

Re: [CMake] CMake hanging when run inside QEmu

2011-03-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
it mildly, it is completely useless on this arm. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am starting a separate thread on this hanging issue. -- Forwarded message -- From: Laszlo Papp xx Date: 2011/3/8 Subject

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
issues otherwise no idea how to get this functionality working officially... Best Regards, Laszlo PApp On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/8 Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us: On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-06 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/6 Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us: Mmh, my previous mail is blocked because the cpack.log is too big. http://djszapi.homelinux.net/rpmbuild.out http://djszapi.homelinux.net/rpmbuild.err http

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-06 Thread Laszlo Papp
not automated by a generator. I am not sure it helps with anything after all, but I try to provide as much as I can. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us wrote: On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/6 Laszlo

[CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-05 Thread Laszlo Papp
I have been said by Thiago, it is because of the missing -march=armv7-a option. It should be handled internally by cmake, can you fix this bug, please and tell me the hackaround that I can use until the release ? Thank you in advance! Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Eric

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-05 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/5 Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us: Well, first I cannot build :) I thought you were already using CPack for Deb package? If you never used a cross-compiling setup with CMake then read this first: http

Re: [CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-05 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/3/5 Laszlo Papp djsz...@archlinux.us: Well, first I cannot build :) I thought you were already using CPack for Deb package? Yes, but from scratchbox and scratchbox passed the corrent toolchain arguments

[CMake] CPack and RPM packages

2011-03-04 Thread Laszlo Papp
/gluon/repository/revisions/master/entry/CMakeLists.txt#L162 Can it be done in a similar way to avoid the rpm spec file writing ? Best Regards, Laszlo Papp PS: I am not on the list, so please drop me into the 'CC' field. ___ Powered by www.kitware.com

Re: [CMake] config dependent defines

2010-10-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS -Wall) SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELWITHDEBINFO -Wall -O2 -g) SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE -Wall -O2) SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_DEBUG -Wall -g3 -ggdb -O0 CACHE STRING Debug options. FORCE) An example from my configuration. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:38 AM

[CMake] QT4 and MOC

2010-10-02 Thread Laszlo Papp
the moc file include at the end of my source line. I would like to link that generated moc at linkage time, mostly. Thank you in advance. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http

[CMake] Environment Variable - /var

2010-09-28 Thread Laszlo Papp
there is an internal solution. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki

Re: [CMake] Environment Variable - /var

2010-09-28 Thread Laszlo Papp
It is not a KDE project ... Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 28 September 2010, Laszlo Papp wrote: Hi, Is there such an environment variable, like in case autoconf:   --localstatedir=DIR     modifiable

Re: [CMake] Environment Variable - /var

2010-09-28 Thread Laszlo Papp
The short answer is then: there is no such an option. Oki doki, thank you. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 28 September 2010, Laszlo Papp wrote: It is not a KDE project ... It was just meant

  1   2   >