[CMake] [CTest] Does add_test suppress the output of ctest?

Hello CMake-gurus, I'm adding tests to my project (with add_test) and let add_test call ctest with some parameters, e.g.: add_test(some_test ${CMAKE_CTEST_COMMAND} -V --build-and-test ...) The tests will be called by make test, for example, and they are successfully built and run. Except, that

[CMake] Re: [CTest] Does add_test suppress the output of ctest?

to reformulate my former question: How can I get the output from ctest -V or ctest -VV when running make test? Thanks again Marco -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: wedekind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Juli 2007 16:56 An: 'cmake@cmake.org' Betreff: [CTest] Does add_test

Re: [CMake] Cmake with Eclipse

Hi Alex, There is a new class cmExternalMakefileProjectGenerator, which can be subclassed and be used to create project files for your prefered IDE. This is really cool! I have implemented such a makefile-based generator with additional IDE-files and it was quite annoying to set it up.

Re: [CMake] visual studio 2005 solution folders

Hi David, I've recently implemented a simple method to add a solution folder to Visual Studio projects. It basicly creates a solution-folder named CMAKE and adds some CMake-generated projects to it. The source code sample below needs to be added to

[CMake] Visual Studio source control binding

Hello all, recently, I have added source control bindings to the Visual Studio generator of my cvs-copy of cmake. Now I am able to bind my cmake-generated VS project files to our source control system perforce. Which is quite convenient, since I do not have to switch from VS to my perforce client

Re: [CMake] Re: IDE directly supporting CMakeLists.txt?

Hello all, thanks for your thoughts and hints. I guess I can sum up for me now that at the moment there is no IDE that directly supports CMakeLists.txt files. And there are reasons for that. Nevertheless I think it would enhance CMake's usability in IDEs greatly if they would offer such a

[CMake] IDE directly supporting CMakeLists.txt?

Hello all, does anyone know of an IDE that directly supports CMakeLists.txt as its build-configuration files? I know that kdevelop supports it, but it seems as if CMake-support is not yet fully integrated and working. Are there alternatives? Cheers Marco

AW: [CMake] Strange problem with parsing variables

Hello all, I just want to revive my topic from two weeks ago. Please have a look at the mail below. Can you reproduce this behaviour? What's the reason behind it or is it a bug? Cheers Marco -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: wedekind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Januar

AW: [CMake] Strange problem with parsing variables

Hi Ken, thanks for your reply. Though I'm reading this list quite regularly I have missed this fix :( Cheers Marco -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ken Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 16:42 An: 'wedekind'; cmake@cmake.org Betreff: RE: [CMake] Strange

[CMake] Re: IDE directly supporting CMakeLists.txt?

Hello all, thanks for your hints. Well, ok, I could use any IDE that can be configured to run any command as its build command. So a text editor will do generally. But this is not exactly what I want. I'm looking for an IDE that supports the CMakeLists.txt such that it interprets them and

[CMake] Strange problem with parsing variables

Hello all, I've encountered a strange parsing problem with a 2-month old checkout from CMake's cvs repository. Please have a look at the following sample CMakeLists.txt: SET(SOME_VAR 1) IF(SOME_VAR) MESSAGE(SOME_VAR is set to true) ENDIF(SOME_VAR) IF(NOT SOME_VAR) SET(SOME_OTHER_VAR

AW: [CMake] [CPack] Changing the appearance of the NSIS installer

Hi David, thanks for reply, even it's 2 months later it was still helpful for me. I've followed your steps and it works for me! Unfortunately I cannot reproduce what I have done wrong 2 months ago, but I guess the main difference to your approach is that I have tried to use my own

[CMAKE]: ADD_DEPENDENCIES not working as expected

Hello all, recently I have encountered a unexpected behaviour of ADD_DEPENDENCIES. My goal is to have a set of targets that are not built with the ALL-target. They should be built using an empty helper-target. The helper-target is an empty custom target in a CMakeLists.txt in some root-directory:

Re: [CMake] How to set the install directory for MacOSX/PackageMaker

Hello again, is anyone of you building packages with CPack for MacOSX? Do you think it is a problem that you cannot change the installation-root of a PackageMaker package? I've looked at CPack's source code which sets the installation root-dir of PackageMaker installers to /usr by default. It is

[CMake] How to set the install directory for MacOSX/PackageMaker

Hello all, I have tried to build my first MacOSX package today. It works very well so far, but since I am totally new to the Mac I have some questions related to the installation process. CPack creates a package which installs to /usr by default, i.e. /usr is the root-dir of the installation.

Re: WG: AW: AW: [CMake] AW: Wrong interpretation of optimized and debug Qt-libs in TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES

Hello Brandon, thanks for your input. So you are the only person who ever builds your software? If other people have to build your stuff, you're making it a PITA for them, having to remember precisely what Qt directory to use. All this knowledge is locked up in your head, or in your docs,

Re: WG: AW: AW: [CMake] AW: Wrong interpretation of optimized and debug Qt-libs in TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES

Hello Brandon, thanks for your input. So you are the only person who ever builds your software? If other people have to build your stuff, you're making it a PITA for them, having to remember precisely what Qt directory to use. All this knowledge is locked up in your head, or in your docs,

AW: [CMake] AW: Wrong interpretation of optimized and debug Qt-libs in TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES

Hello Bill, OK, good find. It looks like both the debug and optimized libs are being used in the depend. :) They are not being used on the link line which is good...Just curious, it should not have been able to find a library that does not exist on your machine, so you must have set the

AW: AW: [CMake] AW: Wrong interpretation of optimized and debug Qt-libs in TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES

Hello Bill, Yes, it should be correct, and will be for 2.4.5 (which maybe coming sooner than later... :-( ) I am not quite sure why you would add it by hand if it does not exist... Well, I need this lib, the debug version of the qt-lib, only sometimes. I did not have installed it yet, but I

[CMake] AW: Wrong interpretation of optimized and debug Qt-libs in TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES

Hello Bill, There was a change What version of QT are you using? Also, what FindQt are you using? What is the value of QT_QT_LIBRARY? I am using Qt 3.3.5, FindQt3.cmake and QT_QT_LIBRARY is correctly set to /home/wedekind/ThirdParty/QT/3.3.5, which is the root dir of my qt-installation

[CMake] AW: Wrong interpretation of optimized and debug Qt-libs in TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES

Hello Bill, after a long code-walk I have solved my problem. The function cmMakefileTargetGenerator::AppendTargetDepends() has added the libs to the target's EXTERNAL_OBJECTS list. This has caused make to try to build that external object, e.g. the Qt-lib, if it was not present. BTW: Does it

[CMake] Re: CMake 2.4.4 available for download

Hello all, I guess there has been a change in the interpretation of optimized and debug libraries used in the TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES command. In 2.4.3 the following line successfully produced a link to the Qt libraries: TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(JCore optimized ${QT_QT_LIBRARY} debug

[CMake] Change in variable resolution?

Hello all, I have been using CMake 2.4.3 until today. Now I wanted to switch to CMake 2.4.4 or the CVS-version. After playing around with the CVS-version, I have observed a change in the resolution of CMake variables. I have been using two methods of denoting CMake variables: 1)

AW: [CMake] Change in variable resolution?

Hello Bill, This seems to be a bug fix: http://www.cmake.org/Bug/bug.php?op=showbugid=2722 There was some discussion here: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/2006-January/007942.html There seems to be an error in this bug-fix. As I understand it, the intent was to still allow resolution

[CMake] [CPACK]: How to put release and debug files in _one_ package?

Hello all, is it possible to create an installer package with CPack that contains both release and debug installations of a software? I have seen from the CVS' source code that currently there is an option CPACK_BUILD_CONFIG, which seems to default to Release. Can I set this to another value

AW: [CMake] [CPack] Changing the appearance of the NSIS installer

Hello David You should be able to use your own NSIS.template.in file if you name it exactly the same as CMake's copy and then add the directory containing your own copy of it to CMAKE_MODULE_PATH. For example, if your copy is in a subdirectory of your source directory named Templates, you

[CMake] [CPack] Changing the appearance of the NSIS installer

Hello all, I have been looking for a way to modify various aspects of the CPack-generated NSIS installer. I cannot put all these changes into CPACK_NSIS_* commands. So I have modified the NSIS.template.in of CMake. I would prefer to do that as clean as possible. Therefore I would like to

[CMake] Will there be an official (documented) version of cpack?

Hello, I am using CMake 2.4.3 a little while now (on windows, linux, mac) and have just begun discovering CPack. I have managed to create a simple installer on a windows platform quite easily. But I am missing some kind of a CPack-documentation. At least a list of command line parameters like

AW: [CMake] Variable denoting the object suffix

Hello Brad, thanks for your reply! It works now :) Marco -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Brad King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 12. Juni 2006 21:49 An: wedekind Cc: cmake@cmake.org Betreff: Re: [CMake] Variable denoting the object suffix wedekind wrote

AW: [CMake] Variable denoting the object suffix

Hello Brad, thanks for your reply! It works now :) Marco -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Brad King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 12. Juni 2006 21:49 An: wedekind Cc: cmake@cmake.org Betreff: Re: [CMake] Variable denoting the object suffix wedekind wrote

[CMake] Understanding SET- and GET_TARGET_PROPERTY

Hello all, I am using CMake 2.2.3 and have a question about SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES and GET_TARGET_PROPERTY. If I am setting a target-specific property like this SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES(myproject1 PROPERTIES myprop1 myvalue1) I would like to read this property from another target myproject2 like

AW: [CMake] CMake: Problem with reading files with semicolons

file with CMake? Thanks in advance and best regards Marco -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: William A. Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 19:55 An: wedekind; cmake@cmake.org Betreff: Re: [CMake] CMake: Problem with reading files with semicolons At 01:21

[CMake] CMake: Problem with reading files with semicolons

Hi all, a quick question for CMake-gurus: Why do all semicolons disappear after reading a file using FILE(READ c:/some/file.txt TheFile) ??? If I print the output variable TheFile like this: MESSAGE(${TheFile}) it is missing all semicolons! That is destroying my source files while I am about