On 2011-02-21 12:42-0500 David Cole wrote:
This should be fixed already in CMake's 'next' branch. If you can try
a nightly installer, or build yourself from 'next', let me know if
there is still any problem.
Fix will be in 2.8.5 when it comes out in a few months.
I got bitten by this bug
One more detail, this seems to be a problem only on non windows (non-make) -
windows VS machines ran the tests in correct declaration order.
Allen
Bug reported:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11877
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
This should be fixed already in CMake's 'next' branch. If you can try
a nightly installer, or build yourself from 'next', let me know if
there is still any problem.
Fix will be in 2.8.5 when it comes out in a few months.
Thanks,
David
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Allen D Byrne
Yup. ctest -N and ctest without -N differ in test ordering.
Congratulations! You've reported the first regression bug in CMake
2.8.4! :-)
I suspect the change for this bug [
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11561 ] has introduced this
issue. I'll make a new issue that we can
Bug reported:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11877
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Yup. ctest -N and ctest without -N differ in test ordering.
Congratulations! You've reported the first regression bug in CMake
2.8.4! :-)
I suspect
I just installed 2.8.4 and on my fedora 14 linux box the ctest -D Experimental
stage decided to run the tests in some unknown to me order. The previous
versions always ran them in order of definition. Any thing I can do to get the
ordering back?
Allen
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Allen D Byrne b...@hdfgroup.org wrote:
I just installed 2.8.4 and on my fedora 14 linux box the ctest -D
Experimental stage decided to run the tests in some unknown to me order. The
previous versions always ran them in order of definition. Any thing I can do
to
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:08 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Allen D Byrne b...@hdfgroup.org wrote:
I just installed 2.8.4 and on my fedora 14 linux box the ctest -D
Experimental stage decided to run the tests in some unknown to me order. The
This was from a clean build folder. And I just want the test to run in the
order defined in the CMakeLists.txt files. Also never had set any COST
properties. The surprise was that this never happened before.
Allen
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:08 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Allen D Byrne b...@hdfgroup.org wrote:
This was from a clean build folder. And I just want the test to run in the
order defined in the CMakeLists.txt files. Also never had set any COST
properties. The surprise was that this never happened before.
Allen
On
Just using standard gcc/gfortran on the fedora distro. It is the 64bit version?
You can grab one of our recent src tarballs from
http://www.hdfgroup.org/ftp/HDF5/hdf5-1.8.6/;
Allen
PS. I will be out of touch for the next 36 hours
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Allen D Byrne b...@hdfgroup.org
After building HDF5 v 1.8.6 on my Mac, I get this:
$ ctest -N
Test project /Users/davidcole/tmp/b6
Test #1: testhdf5
Test #2: accum
Test #3: lheap
Test #4: ohdr
Test #5: stab
Test #6: gheap
Test #7: pool
Test #8: hyperslab
Test #9: istore
Test #10: bittests
Test
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:21:22 -0500, David Cole said:
I'm not familiar enough with HDF5 to know if this is correct or not.
Is this the same order you're seeing?
Or can you tell me your expected order? I'll try to analyze the source
tree and figure out what's going on, but what you expect will
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Sean McBride s...@rogue-research.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:21:22 -0500, David Cole said:
I'm not familiar enough with HDF5 to know if this is correct or not.
Is this the same order you're seeing?
Or can you tell me your expected order? I'll try to
14 matches
Mail list logo
