Hello,
I'm trying to create a simple exercise, a definition for a virtual language
X that will be used side-by-side with C and C++.
There are some restrictions on the level of compatibility with C/C++. For
instance, the objects of this language aren't directly compatible with C
and C++ but then
On 11/16/2011 4:03 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
Hi Bill:
Your summary shows you misunderstood what I said so I have to correct
that. The basic issue I have with your interpretation is additional
generic language support != Creating a generic way to add new
languages
OK, let me try again.
On 11/16/2011 04:13 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I'd still like to know how to explain to cmake that the command produces
2 files, but at least I can get rid of my hack.
That (assuming just a simple object file is produced by compilation)
is one of several general limitations with CMake language
On 11/16/2011 3:52 AM, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 11/16/2011 04:13 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I'd still like to know how to explain to cmake that the command produces
2 files, but at least I can get rid of my hack.
That (assuming just a simple object file is produced by compilation)
is one of
On 2011-11-15 23:35-0500 Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 11/14/2011 3:24 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
If you are willing to make such an OCaml summary, I would be willing
to do the same thing for Ada to make our joint case to the CMake
developers of what kind of additional generic language support is
I'd still like to know how to explain to cmake that the command produces
2 files, but at least I can get rid of my hack.
That (assuming just a simple object file is produced by compilation)
is one of several general limitations with CMake language support. For
example, my understanding is
On 11/14/2011 3:24 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
If you are willing to make such an OCaml summary, I would be willing
to do the same thing for Ada to make our joint case to the CMake
developers of what kind of additional generic language support is
needed by CMake to deal with the complicated build
On 11/15/2011 10:13 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I'm trying to use CMake for a new project here. This project (a new
programming language, whose first implementation is in OCaml) is
currently in the very first stages (I have barely more than the lexer
written) and doesn't require anything
On 2011-11-15 22:13-0500 Stefan Monnier wrote:
I'd still like to know how to explain to cmake that the command produces
2 files, but at least I can get rid of my hack.
That (assuming just a simple object file is produced by compilation)
is one of several general limitations with CMake language
If the -c option is given, specify the name of the
object file produced for the next source file that appears on the
command line.
So if the help says that -o is supposed to do something sensible when used
with -c but it doesn't, I'd suggest to file a bug. Note that the order of
arguments
On 2011-11-14 13:30-0500 Stefan Monnier wrote:
I'd still like to know how to explain to cmake that the command produces
2 files, but at least I can get rid of my hack.
That (assuming just a simple object file is produced by compilation)
is one of several general limitations with CMake
According to http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual022.html, it
does:
-o exec-file
Specify the name of the output file produced by the compiler. The
default output name is a.out under Unix and camlprog.exe under Windows. If
This manpage describes all kinds of uses and in
I'm trying to use cmake for a project using OCaml, so I'm trying to add
support for a new language.
Just in case you weren't aware of that.
There has been [several] discussions on the ML
in the past concerning CMake OCaml support at least this one:
Am Freitag, 11. November 2011, 15:55:12 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
According to http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual022.html,
it does:
-o exec-file
Specify the name of the output file produced by the compiler. The
default output name is a.out under Unix and
I'm trying to use cmake for a project using OCaml, so I'm trying to add
support for a new language.
Among the many problems I encounter, the most pressing is the
following: the rule to build object files (CMAKE_OCaml_COMPILE_OBJECT)
seems to want a command that takes SOURCE and generates OBJECT,
Am 09.11.2011 23:00, schrieb Stefan Monnier:
I'm trying to use cmake for a project using OCaml, so I'm trying to
add
support for a new language.
Among the many problems I encounter, the most pressing is the
following: the rule to build object files
(CMAKE_OCaml_COMPILE_OBJECT)
seems to want a
2011/11/9 Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca:
I'm trying to use cmake for a project using OCaml, so I'm trying to add
support for a new language.
Just in case you weren't aware of that.
There has been [several] discussions on the ML
in the past concerning CMake OCaml support at least this
17 matches
Mail list logo
