On 28. Jun, 2010, at 7:03 , Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 05:09:41PM -0400, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote:
Your remarks focus on old-fashioned macros so it is possible you are not
aware of functions? As far as I know, most or all macros can be replaced by
functions
On 06/28/2010 08:55 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 28. Jun, 2010, at 7:03 , Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 05:09:41PM -0400, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote:
Your remarks focus on old-fashioned macros so it is possible you are not
aware of functions? As far as I know, most
On 2010-06-28 07:03+0200 Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 05:09:41PM -0400, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote:
Your remarks focus on old-fashioned macros so it is possible you are not
aware of functions? As far as I know, most or all macros can be replaced by
functions which do
I don't expect a lot of support for what I'm about to say, but I think it's
perhaps worth saying anyway...
It seems like CMake's and CTest's have outgrown their scripting languages.
As far as I can tell, all CMake/CTest variables are either macro formal
parameters, or variables in a single
2010/6/27 Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC NWPT christian.con...@navy.mil:
I don't expect a lot of support for what I'm about to say, but I think it's
perhaps worth saying anyway...
It seems like CMake's and CTest's have outgrown their scripting languages.
As far as I can tell, all CMake/CTest
To: Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC NWPT
Cc: alokgo...@hotmail.com; cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] An observation about CTest
2010/6/27 Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC NWPT
christian.con...@navy.mil:
I don't expect a lot of support for what I'm about to say,
but I think it's perhaps worth
Your remarks focus on old-fashioned macros so it is possible you are not
aware of functions? As far as I know, most or all macros can be replaced by
functions which do have the nice property of not polluting the global
namespace. So newly developed build systems should use functions wherever
. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 16:49
To: Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC NWPT
Cc: alokgo...@hotmail.com; cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] An observation about CTest
Your remarks focus on old-fashioned macros so it is possible
you are not aware
. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 16:49
To: Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC NWPT
Cc: alokgo...@hotmail.com; cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] An observation about CTest
Your remarks focus on old-fashioned macros so it is possible
you are not aware
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 05:09:41PM -0400, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote:
Your remarks focus on old-fashioned macros so it is possible you are not
aware of functions? As far as I know, most or all macros can be replaced by
functions which do have the nice property of not polluting the
Subject: [CMake] An observation about CTest
Hi guys,
First off, I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who's helped me
figure out how to use CTest in the past few weeks. I'm very grateful to you
and to those who develop CTest.
I'd like to offer one piece of constructive criticism
Hi guys,
First off, I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who's helped me
figure out how to use CTest in the past few weeks. I'm very grateful to you
and to those who develop CTest.
I'd like to offer one piece of constructive criticism about ctest. If found
learning how to use it
12 matches
Mail list logo
