Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-08-08 Thread Florian Reinhard
2011/8/1 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: I attached the gdb output i got. I've been running gdb from a minGW32 installation on a normal windows cmd.exe on windows7 x64. Unfortunately there's no backtrace (or i'm just don't know gdb well enough) and as soon as i execute strace after

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-08-01 Thread Florian Reinhard
2011/7/29 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: On Friday 29 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: 2011/7/22 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: Can you build cmake from this branch I just created ? http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/TI_DSP_

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-08-01 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 01 August 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: 2011/7/29 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: On Friday 29 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: 2011/7/22 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: Can you build cmake from this branch I just created ?

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-29 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday 29 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: Yay! Native support for cl6x TI compiler! :) 2011/7/22 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: Can you build cmake from this branch I just created ? http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/TI_DSP_ Compiler

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-23 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday 22 July 2011, Johan Björk wrote: Alex, I'm trying to conditionally enable ASM support for my compilers that support it (I have a project that gets crosscompiled to a whole slew of architectures). In an ideal situation, I would use ENABLE_LANGUAGE(ASM OPTIONAL) and check the

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-22 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 21 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: Hi Alex, Thank you for the quick response, 2011/7/20 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: Damn, I was so sure I updated the wiki, but apparently I didn't. So here are the old docs, but this changed quite a bit for 2.8.5:

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-22 Thread Johan Björk
Alex, I'm trying to conditionally enable ASM support for my compilers that support it (I have a project that gets crosscompiled to a whole slew of architectures). In an ideal situation, I would use ENABLE_LANGUAGE(ASM OPTIONAL) and check the flag if it works or not. For a few of the compilers,

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-21 Thread Florian Reinhard
Hi Alex, Thank you for the quick response, 2011/7/20 Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net: Damn, I was so sure I updated the wiki, but apparently I didn't. So here are the old docs, but this changed quite a bit for 2.8.5: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/CMake/Assembler What it does now: the

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-21 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi Florian, On Thursday 21 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: Hi Alex, Thank you for the quick response, Can you please create a ticket in the cmake bug tracker at http://public.kitware.com/Bug and put all the information there ? I'll assign it to me, and we should get it working.

[CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-20 Thread Florian Reinhard
Hi, in 2.8.4 i added these lines to my project and had .asm files compiled correctly: ...set C/CXX compiler and how they are called... ENABLE_LANGUAGE(ASM) SET (CMAKE_ASM_COMPILE_OBJECT CMAKE_C_COMPILER -fr=OBJECT_DIR -eo=.asm.obj DEFINES FLAGS SOURCE) PROJECT (myproject) ...add soruces,

Re: [CMake] Assembler handling in 2.8.5 vs 2.8.4

2011-07-20 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 20 July 2011, Florian Reinhard wrote: Hi, in 2.8.4 i added these lines to my project and had .asm files compiled correctly: ...set C/CXX compiler and how they are called... ENABLE_LANGUAGE(ASM) SET (CMAKE_ASM_COMPILE_OBJECT CMAKE_C_COMPILER -fr=OBJECT_DIR -eo=.asm.obj