Re: [CMake] Boost macro behavior with respect to version

2011-02-12 Thread Michael Hertling
On 02/10/2011 09:17 PM, Adams, Brian M wrote: I'm curious if the behavior I'm seeing with respect to FindBoost.cmake is expected. (I realize I'm using these macros in a convoluted way, so understand if I can't make it work more cleanly.) What I'd like to be able to do is something like

[CMake] Boost macro behavior with respect to version

2011-02-10 Thread Adams, Brian M
I'm curious if the behavior I'm seeing with respect to FindBoost.cmake is expected. (I realize I'm using these macros in a convoluted way, so understand if I can't make it work more cleanly.) What I'd like to be able to do is something like the following to probe for a system-provided or

Re: [CMake] Boost macro behavior with respect to version

2011-02-10 Thread Ryan Pavlik
I'm not entirely sure why FindBoost uses the cache in the way it does, as it seems to cause a fair amount of issues. I've made an experimental modification of FindBoost.cmake that doesn't use internal cache variables here: [1] It seems to work in my initial tests, but it's probably not ideal and