A while ago I started looking at using CMake to build OCaml projects. As part
of that I put together some useful (but maybe not very beautiful) macros.
They are available on github[1].
I've come to the conclusion that while CMake is a rather good build tool, it
isn't very well designed to add
2010/8/25 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
A while ago I started looking at using CMake to build OCaml projects. As part
of that I put together some useful (but maybe not very beautiful) macros.
They are available on github[1].
I've come to the conclusion that while CMake is a rather
On 2010-08-25 16:32+0100 Magnus Therning wrote:
I've come to the conclusion that while CMake is a rather good build tool, it
isn't very well designed to add full support for slightly esoteric languages
and tool chains like OCaml.
I generally agree with that conclusion concerning CMake
On 2010-08-25 17:50+0200 Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/25 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
A while ago I started looking at using CMake to build OCaml projects. As part
of that I put together some useful (but maybe not very beautiful) macros.
They are available on github[1].
I've come to
2010/8/25 Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca:
On 2010-08-25 17:50+0200 Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/25 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
A while ago I started looking at using CMake to build OCaml projects. As
part
of that I put together some useful (but maybe not very beautiful)
Hi Eric:
On 2010-08-25 22:20+0200 Eric Noulard wrote:
[...]My ideas was that some languages:
- OCaml (ocamlbuild)
- ADA (gnatmake)
- may Java too (ant/maven)
have already very efficient build tool with some history of usage too.
I don't know many Java developers who speaks
