Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-09 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: Robert Dailey wrote: Hi, I noticed after switching to version 2.6.3 that header files (with HPP extension) are marked as Exclude from build in Visual Studio 2008. Is this behavior by design? If so, why? You don't

Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-09 Thread Michael Jackson
On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: Robert Dailey wrote: Hi, I noticed after switching to version 2.6.3 that header files (with HPP extension) are marked as Exclude from build in Visual Studio

Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-09 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Michael Jackson mike.jack...@bluequartz.net wrote: On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: Robert Dailey wrote: Hi, I noticed after switching to version 2.6.3 that

Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-09 Thread Bill Hoffman
Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: Yes, I'm using QT4_WRAP_CPP (with plans to move to automoc), but that right-click, compile to run moc is useful (no need to close the solution or reload projects) and it's what VC++ developers are used to. With CMake, you can still right click and compile, it will

Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-09 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: Yes, I'm using QT4_WRAP_CPP (with plans to move to automoc), but that right-click, compile to run moc is useful  (no need to close the solution or reload projects) and it's what VC++

Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-09 Thread Bill Hoffman
Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: Yes, I'm using QT4_WRAP_CPP (with plans to move to automoc), but that right-click, compile to run moc is useful (no need to close the solution or reload

Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-09 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
What does not work is what I am doing: I'm listing the .h files as source files so that they show in the VC++ project. Now, given that header files are marked as excluded from build, VC++ disables right-click-and-compile for those header files. The .h file is not compiled, so that would not

Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-09 Thread Bill Hoffman
Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: What does not work is what I am doing: I'm listing the .h files as source files so that they show in the VC++ project. Now, given that header files are marked as excluded from build, VC++ disables right-click-and-compile for those header files. The .h file is not

Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-04 Thread Bill Hoffman
Robert Dailey wrote: Hi, I noticed after switching to version 2.6.3 that header files (with HPP extension) are marked as Exclude from build in Visual Studio 2008. Is this behavior by design? If so, why? You don't want to compile .hpp files do you? -Bill

Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-04 Thread Robert Dailey
But by default visual studio does not compile HPP or H files. I've *never* had this problem in any version of visual studio starting from version 6. On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote: Robert Dailey wrote: Hi, I noticed after switching to version

Re: [CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-04 Thread Bill Hoffman
Robert Dailey wrote: But by default visual studio does not compile HPP or H files. I've *never* had this problem in any version of visual studio starting from version 6. So, what is the problem? CMake marks all files that should not be compiled as do not compile. Is this causing trouble?

[CMake] Concern with 2.6.3

2009-03-03 Thread Robert Dailey
Hi, I noticed after switching to version 2.6.3 that header files (with HPP extension) are marked as Exclude from build in Visual Studio 2008. Is this behavior by design? If so, why? ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source