[CMake] ExternalProject in 2.6

2011-06-20 Thread Ilja Golshtein
Hello, is it possible to backport ExternalProject to 2.6? Did anyone try successfully or unsuccessfully? Unfortunately 2.8 is not an option since it is not included even in recent RHEL 6.0. Thanks. -- Best regards, Ilja Golshtein. ___ Powered by

Re: [CMake] ExternalProject in 2.6

2011-06-20 Thread Michael Wild
On 06/20/2011 11:28 AM, Ilja Golshtein wrote: Hello, is it possible to backport ExternalProject to 2.6? Did anyone try successfully or unsuccessfully? Unfortunately 2.8 is not an option since it is not included even in recent RHEL 6.0. Thanks. You can also download the 2.8 binaries

Re: [CMake] ExternalProject in 2.6

2011-06-20 Thread Ilja Golshtein
Michael, the problem is I cannot make my project dependent on CMake 2.8 since 2.8 does not exist in major server distros. That is why I am asking if it is impossible/possible/already_done to backport ExternalProject to 2.6. Thanks. 20.06.2011, 13:39, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com: On

Re: [CMake] ExternalProject in 2.6

2011-06-20 Thread Michael Wild
I don't see why it shouldn't be possible. 2.6 already had the function() command, and I can't think of anything else that might miss. Have you actually tried it? Michael On 06/20/2011 11:46 AM, Ilja Golshtein wrote: Michael, the problem is I cannot make my project dependent on CMake 2.8

Re: [CMake] ExternalProject in 2.6

2011-06-20 Thread David Cole
messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake It would be prohibitively difficult to use ExternalProject with cmake 2.6. It uses the cmake --build feature extensively

Re: [CMake] ExternalProject in 2.6

2011-06-20 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 20 June 2011, Ilja Golshtein wrote: Michael, the problem is I cannot make my project dependent on CMake 2.8 since 2.8 does not exist in major server distros. You can simply wget the binary release for Linux and unpack it somewhere, e.g. in /opt/. It will work and it is completely