Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-21 Thread Brad King
Dieter Oberkofler wrote: This does sound very interesting but I'm not sure if I understand how this might replace my need for a wrapper. To better understand, it would be most helpful, if you could eventually post a short CMakeLists.txt snipped on how to capture the output from a compile/link

[CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Dieter Oberkofler
I might sound old fashioned but I'm still only building from the command line and only use an IDE (XCode on Mac and VS on the PC) when debugging. I therefore manually changed the CMake compile and link rules to always generate an error file for each file that gets compiled or linked. This is quite

Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/7/15 Dieter Oberkofler doberkofler.li...@gmail.com: I might sound old fashioned but I'm still only building from the command line and only use an IDE (XCode on Mac and VS on the PC) when debugging. OK, command line is great :-) I usually edit in some editors (vi, [x]emacs, eclipse etc...)

Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Dieter Oberkofler
no longer needed. Thank you, -D -Original Message- From: Eric Noulard [mailto:eric.noul...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:12 PM To: Dieter Oberkofler Cc: CMake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build 2009/7/15 Dieter Oberkofler

Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/7/15 Dieter Oberkofler doberkofler.li...@gmail.com: But I do not need that feature, would you explain why you need the 1 file compiled - 1 file error mapping? Generally speaking to keep track of each individual file status. This especially useful, when dealing with compiler warnings that

Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Bill Hoffman
CVS CMake/CTest has a new wrapper mode that can be used.It is set with CTEST_USE_LAUNCHERS=1. -Bill ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep

Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/7/15 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com: CVS CMake/CTest has a new wrapper mode that can be used.    It is set with CTEST_USE_LAUNCHERS=1. I'm not sure to understand that. How can it be used? What does it make? Is there some doc for this ? On the Wiki ? In a source file? -- Erk

Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Bill Hoffman
Eric Noulard wrote: 2009/7/15 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com: CVS CMake/CTest has a new wrapper mode that can be used.It is set with CTEST_USE_LAUNCHERS=1. I'm not sure to understand that. How can it be used? What does it make? Is there some doc for this ? On the Wiki ? In a

Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/7/15 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com Eric Noulard wrote: 2009/7/15 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com: CVS CMake/CTest has a new wrapper mode that can be used.    It is set with CTEST_USE_LAUNCHERS=1. I'm not sure to understand that. How can it be used? What does it make?

Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Dieter Oberkofler
. Thank you! -D -Original Message- From: Bill Hoffman [mailto:bill.hoff...@kitware.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:15 PM To: Eric Noulard Cc: Dieter Oberkofler; CMake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build Eric Noulard wrote: 2009/7/15 Bill

Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Dieter Oberkofler
Subject: Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build 2009/7/15 Dieter Oberkofler doberkofler.li...@gmail.com: But I do not need that feature, would you explain why you need the 1 file compiled - 1 file error mapping? Generally speaking to keep track of each individual file status

Re: [CMake] Processing the output from CMake build

2009-07-15 Thread Eric Noulard
2009/7/15 Dieter Oberkofler doberkofler.li...@gmail.com: Since the build is done by the target generator (make, nmake, etc...) I would say the change should be made in each generator you are wanting to support/use beginning with Makefile generator. This is correct. 1) On first invocation of