On Dienstag, 17. April 2018 13:48:39 CEST David Demelier wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 12:25 +0200, Johannes Zarl-Zierl wrote:
> > Just replying to this topic of your message: you may want to
> > reconsider. The
> > cmake gui allows you to group options automatically by prefix. This
> >
2018-04-17 11:58 GMT+02:00 David Demelier :
> Hello,
>
> In my application I have some custom functions that help the process of
> creating executable, libraries, plugins and such.
>
> They don't do magic things but they mostly build, provide installation
> to specific place
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:48 PM, David Demelier
wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 12:25 +0200, Johannes Zarl-Zierl wrote:
> > Just replying to this topic of your message: you may want to
> > reconsider. The
> > cmake gui allows you to group options automatically by prefix.
On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 12:25 +0200, Johannes Zarl-Zierl wrote:
> Just replying to this topic of your message: you may want to
> reconsider. The
> cmake gui allows you to group options automatically by prefix. This
> de-clutters
> the options considerably.
I didn't know that! Nice catch. I'll
Hi David,
On Dienstag, 17. April 2018 11:58:12 CEST David Demelier wrote:
> I personally do not want to prefix all my options in my project with
> the project name prefix, I think that would be a bit ugly, and I do
> want this macro to build and install the documentation.
Just replying to this
Hello,
In my application I have some custom functions that help the process of
creating executable, libraries, plugins and such.
They don't do magic things but they mostly build, provide installation
to specific place and optionally build the documentation and install
them as well. This happens