Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-10-01 Thread Michael Jackson
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/BuildingOSXApplications Done. and I updated the project also. it can now be found also on the wiki site: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/images/e/e3/QTTest.zip The updates include changes so that the bundle only gets completed during a installation process. I welcome

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-30 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, Mike Jackson wrote: http://www.bluequartz.net/QTTest.tar.gz It was just over the size limit. I guess I could have removed the icon file.. It would be nice if one of you could add something about this to the wiki, since it seems to be missing :-) Thanks Alex

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-17 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Mike Jackson wrote: After some tinkering this afternoon with a small cmake project on OS X (based on Qt4) I was able to use the latest bits from CMake CVS to create a stand alone OS X bundle that correctly runs install_name_tool on the .app bundle and copies

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-17 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tuesday 16 September 2008, you wrote: Hate to say it, but I've gone through this with several projects now, and there seems to be an irreducible lower-limit on complexity. Yes... That seems to be true. Wherever I look, people are always doing this kind of thing slightly differently. You

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-17 Thread Stephen Collyer
Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Mike Jackson wrote: After some tinkering this afternoon with a small cmake project on OS X (based on Qt4) I was able to use the latest bits from CMake CVS to create a stand alone OS X bundle that correctly runs install_name_tool on the .app

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-17 Thread Mike Jackson
http://www.bluequartz.net/QTTest.tar.gz It was just over the size limit. I guess I could have removed the icon file.. --- Mike Jackson - Principal Software Engineer www.bluequartz.net On Sep 17, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Stephen Collyer wrote: Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tuesday 16 September

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-17 Thread Mike Arthur
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 20:13:15 Mike Arthur wrote: I've written a CMake Module to do this that I've been meaning to add to the CMake bugtracker for ages. I showed it to Alex Neundorf at Akademy and he seemed very interested. Anyone else? Mike Jackson, I feel there are too many people

[CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Stephen Collyer
Does anyone know of/have a realistic cpack example showing packaging of 3rd party libraries, as well as those built from the install target ? If the third party libraries happened to include Qt, that'd be just fine .. -- Regards Steve Collyer Netspinner Ltd

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Stephen Collyer wrote: Does anyone know of/have a realistic cpack example showing packaging of 3rd party libraries, as well as those built from the install target ? If the third party libraries happened to include Qt, that'd be just fine .. Ah... Well, we're struggling

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Bill Hoffman
Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Stephen Collyer wrote: Does anyone know of/have a realistic cpack example showing packaging of 3rd party libraries, as well as those built from the install target ? If the third party libraries happened to include Qt, that'd be just fine .. Ah...

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Bill Hoffman wrote: Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Stephen Collyer wrote: Does anyone know of/have a realistic cpack example showing packaging of 3rd party libraries, as well as those built from the install target ? If the third party libraries

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: I did try to crib from CMake (as it is in CVS now), but it isn't exactly a small, easy to adapt example :-) Plus, I realize now, it makes an OS X package, not a dd-able bundle. Boudewijn ___ CMake

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Stephen Collyer
Bill Hoffman wrote: You can look at CMake itself. The new QtDialog in particular packages Qt with the cmake gui. That's not a bad idea. Thanks. -- Regards Steve Collyer Netspinner Ltd ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 8:15 AM, Stephen Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know of/have a realistic cpack example showing packaging of 3rd party libraries, as well as those built from the install target ? If the third party libraries happened to include Qt, that'd be just fine .. K-3D doesn't

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 8:26 AM, Boudewijn Rempt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: \ Ah... Well, we're struggling with that ourselves at the moment, and looking in vain some good examples. Right now, we're using CPack for Linux and Windows, and have stopped using CPack for OS X -- where I am right now writing a

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Shead, Timothy wrote: On 9/16/08 8:26 AM, Boudewijn Rempt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: \ Ah... Well, we're struggling with that ourselves at the moment, and looking in vain some good examples. Right now, we're using CPack for Linux and Windows, and have stopped using

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Mike Jackson
There is some new functionality in the latest CVS that is supposed to take care of all this on OS X. I have not had a chance to try it out or work with it yet. If you update to CVS CMake, take a look at the BundleUtilities.cmake file. Supposedly in your CMakeLists.txt code you should just

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Shead, Timothy wrote: On 9/16/08 8:15 AM, Stephen Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know of/have a realistic cpack example showing packaging of 3rd party libraries, as well as those built from the install target ? If the third party libraries happened to

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 9:41 AM, Boudewijn Rempt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Shead, Timothy wrote: On 9/16/08 8:26 AM, Boudewijn Rempt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: \ Ah... Well, we're struggling with that ourselves at the moment, and looking in vain some good examples. Right now, we're

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 9:42 AM, Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is some new functionality in the latest CVS that is supposed to take care of all this on OS X. I have not had a chance to try it out or work with it yet. If you update to CVS CMake, take a look at the BundleUtilities.cmake

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim. I absolutely applaud your efforts to get something working on OS X. With the lack of anything else your solution was the only thing available and did work. Philosophically I don't like the idea of setting the

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 9:43 AM, Boudewijn Rempt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Shead, Timothy wrote: K-3D doesn't use Qt, but it's a clean, realistic example of 3rd-parthy But still seems to want it: INCLUDE(FindQt4) We provide an example of an alternate-user-interface plugin,

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Shead, Timothy
On 9/16/08 10:19 AM, Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim. I absolutely applaud your efforts to get something working on OS X. With the lack of anything else your solution was the only thing available and did

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Mike Arthur
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 16:42:44 Mike Jackson wrote: Philosophically I don't like the idea of setting the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH as that has some unknown implications and would rather see a solution that runs install_name_tool over the needed libraries to fix them up. Again, due to the lack of

Re: [CMake] Small, realistic Cpack example

2008-09-16 Thread Mike Jackson
After some tinkering this afternoon with a small cmake project on OS X (based on Qt4) I was able to use the latest bits from CMake CVS to create a stand alone OS X bundle that correctly runs install_name_tool on the .app bundle and copies needed libraries into the bundle. I have a small