Semi Answering my own question if I set (Boost_NO_BOOST_CMAKE 1) my project
seems to configure ok.
So I guess that is new.
___
Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
Principal Software Engineer
Philip and Todd have been the recent authors/committers in FindBoost.cmake.
Any comments on this one, guys?
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Michael Jackson
mike.jack...@bluequartz.net wrote:
Semi Answering my own question if I set (Boost_NO_BOOST_CMAKE 1) my project
seems
David,
I just tried 2.8.6-rc3 on a Linux machine with a system boost version 1.33.1
and a boost-cmake version 1.47.0. It seems to find both of them fine.
It looks like Michael is using boost-cmake version 1.44, so I tried that too,
but it also works. I'm not sure what could be wrong here.
I
So was (Boost_NO_BOOST_CMAKE 1) introduced in this version of CMake or Past
versions? I will tell you up front that I am only using a subset of Boost that
I create with bcp from boost itself so there could very well be something
slightly off with what I have that has been able to get through
Todd,
Unless somebody other than Mike speaks up that there's a regression,
we won't take any more changes for the final CMake 2.8.6.
From right now on (I just sent the -rc4 email out...) we will only
accept fixes for MAJOR regressions that people notice between now and
next week.
I am targeting
That was introduced in this version, and it disables the recursive call to
find_package with NO_MODULE.
Given the symptoms you are describing, it *sounds* like you might've renamed
the lib/boost-1.44.0 directory that boost-cmake installs to something more
compatible with a standard boost
David,
Sounds good. I'll fix this at some point and push it to next for after 2.8.6.
Philip: if you have any other suggestions let me know; I'll try to put those in
too.
-Todd
On Sep 22, 2011, at 1:17 PM, David Cole wrote:
Todd,
Unless somebody other than Mike speaks up that there's a
