On Friday 04 November 2011, David Cole wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cole wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Robert Dailey
rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:32 PM, David Cole
david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
How would it not be additive?
get_target_property() for INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES would return target includes
+ directory includes (that apply to that target, transitively)
I don't know if preprocessor definitions follow this but this is the
behavior I would expect.
-
Robert Dailey
On Mon,
I think the main use case for saying non-additive would be useful is:
Having several targets in a given directory, most of which simply use
the directory's property value, which contains several include
directories. Now... have one target where you want to restrict the
include_directories to a
On 11/06/2011 09:27 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 11/05/2011 09:59 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 11/02/2011 05:36 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
Thanks ;-)
Michael
Just an additional remark: Instead of generating the proxy headers
in CMakeLists.txt, i.e. at configuration time, one might also have
On 11/05/2011 09:59 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 11/02/2011 05:36 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
Thanks ;-)
Michael
Just an additional remark: Instead of generating the proxy headers
in CMakeLists.txt, i.e. at configuration time, one might also have
them generated by a custom command, i.e. at
On Friday 04 November 2011, David Cole wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
...
Looks like the first step to assigning include directories to libraries,
so they are used automatically when linking against them.
Is this also already in
On 11/02/2011 05:36 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
Thanks ;-)
Michael
Just an additional remark: Instead of generating the proxy headers
in CMakeLists.txt, i.e. at configuration time, one might also have
them generated by a custom command, i.e. at build time, which has
the $CONFIGURATION expression
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cole wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Robert Dailey
rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:32 PM, David Cole
david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Not yet
Meaning there are plans in the works to add
David,
There is a directory-level property for preprocessor definitions too,
right? So how do the target properties for preprocessor definitions handle
those? I think they are additive aren't they?
I would expect the include directories to be additive too.
-
Robert Dailey
On Fri, Nov
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
There is a directory-level property for preprocessor definitions too, right?
So how do the target properties for preprocessor definitions handle those? I
think they are additive aren't they?
I would expect the
On Friday 04 November 2011, David Cole wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cole wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Robert Dailey
rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:32 PM, David Cole
david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Friday 04 November 2011, David Cole wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cole wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Robert Dailey
rcdai...@gmail.com
Thanks for volunteering for this!
-
Robert Dailey
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cole wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Robert Dailey
rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:32 PM, David Cole
Awesome idea, +1
This is probably the best work-around until includes get a target property.
-
Robert Dailey
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/01/2011 09:49 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
Well if you need any help coding the feature let me know.
Thanks ;-)
Michael
On 11/02/2011 05:33 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
Awesome idea, +1
This is probably the best work-around until includes get a target property.
-
Robert Dailey
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com
mailto:them...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cole wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Robert Dailey
rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:32 PM, David Cole
david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Not yet
Meaning there are plans in the works to add such functionality in the
near future?
For now I guess I could actually
Not yet
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
When generating for Visual Studio, is there a way to make projects in debug
configuration have a different set of include directories from the release
configuration?
-
Robert Dailey
--
Powered by
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:32 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Not yet
Meaning there are plans in the works to add such functionality in the near
future?
For now I guess I could actually hard code VS environment variables in my
include directory strings, such as $(Configuration).
--
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:32 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Not yet
Meaning there are plans in the works to add such functionality in the near
future?
For now I guess I could actually hard code VS
Well if you need any help coding the feature let me know. I'm already
liking the idea of adding features I want myself into CMake :)
Thanks!
-
Robert Dailey
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:47 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Robert Dailey
20 matches
Mail list logo
