Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH] UsePkgConfig: improve documentation

2011-09-27 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 03:00:33 PM Rolf Eike Beer wrote: On Thursday, September 22, 2011 01:52:51 PM Rolf Eike Beer wrote: From 3f500a5c655cc4c12ecf6f774602b2a10cae0365 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:48:15 +0200 Tell

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH 1/7] Refactor TargetTypeNames.

2011-09-27 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
From: Nicolas Despres nicolas.desp...@gmail.com Make it a static method instead of an array. It is safer for the type checking and if we add a new target type we will be warned to add a case to the switch. + case cmTarget::UNKNOWN_LIBRARY: +return UNKNOWN_LIBRARY; +//

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH 4/7] Make cmLocalGenerator::ConvertToLinkReference virtual

2011-09-27 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
This provides a mechanism for the local generator to override how library search paths are generated. --- Source/cmLocalGenerator.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/Source/cmLocalGenerator.h b/Source/cmLocalGenerator.h index 1f5a26e..69e452b 100644

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH 4/7] Make cmLocalGenerator::ConvertToLinkReference virtual

2011-09-27 Thread Michael Wild
On 09/27/2011 04:00 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: This provides a mechanism for the local generator to override how library search paths are generated. --- Source/cmLocalGenerator.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/Source/cmLocalGenerator.h

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH 0/7] Preparation for Ninja generator: refactorings, bug fixes

2011-09-27 Thread Michael Wild
On 09/27/2011 02:19 PM, Brad King wrote: On 9/26/2011 11:48 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote: Now that the Ninja generator is passing all tests on Linux, I have decided to start preparing patches, and I am starting with some refactorings and bug fixes developed in the course of developing the

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH 0/7] Preparation for Ninja generator: refactorings, bug fixes

2011-09-27 Thread Brad King
On 9/27/2011 10:34 AM, Michael Wild wrote: On 09/27/2011 02:19 PM, Brad King wrote: Please expand the commit message in patch 7 to elaborate on the specific problems it fixes. That looks like a real bug fix rather than just refactoring. I guess no one has been using per-config link flags.

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH 1/7] Refactor TargetTypeNames.

2011-09-27 Thread Nicolas Desprès
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de wrote: From: Nicolas Despres nicolas.desp...@gmail.com Make it a static method instead of an array. It is safer for the type checking and if we add a new target type we will be warned to add a case to the switch. +      case

[CMake] The output of cpack is an empty file

2011-09-27 Thread pellegrini
Hello everybody, I would like to use cpack in order to gather a set of executables (built statically) into a single archive that could be extracted everywhere the user wants. My project architecture is the following: collections\ CMakeLists.txt prog1\ CMakeLists.txt + source

Re: [CMake] The output of cpack is an empty file

2011-09-27 Thread Eric Noulard
Second message for the list 2011/9/27 pellegrini pellegr...@ill.fr: Hello everybody, I would like to use cpack in order to gather a set of executables (built statically) into a single archive that could be extracted everywhere the user wants. My project architecture is the following:

Re: [CMake] The output of cpack is an empty file - solved

2011-09-27 Thread pellegrini
Eric Noulard a écrit : 2011/9/27 pellegrini pellegr...@ill.fr: Hi Eric, thanks for your quick answer. No, my subprojects do not contains any CPack directives neither include cpack. Should they ? Sorry my fingers slipped. Another message is coming to the list. You need an INSTALL

[CMake] Testing Intel Fortran 12 with cmake in next git

2011-09-27 Thread Mario Rodríguez
Hi, I'm testing the new feature described in this comment of the ticket in http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=11517 I have pushed a fix for this to next. To test you will have to build CMake from git next branch source. If you can do that, please let me know if it works for youheck for working

[CMake] How to use add_custom_command correctly

2011-09-27 Thread Martin Kupke
Hi, in my project there is a subfolder which SHALL contain sources to generate a library. The problem is that at startup of the project there are no source files existing, because they will be generated by a code generator. This means within the build process the code generator needs to be

Re: [CMake] How to use add_custom_command correctly

2011-09-27 Thread Michael Wild
On 09/27/2011 05:59 PM, Martin Kupke wrote: Hi, in my project there is a subfolder which SHALL contain sources to generate a library. The problem is that at startup of the project there are no source files existing, because they will be generated by a code generator. This means within the

[CMake] Xcode 4 and FOLDER target properties

2011-09-27 Thread Steven Wilson
Using the Xcode generator, the FOLDER property of targets appears to do nothing. Is this behavior simply a function a Xcode not supporting groupings of targets or will support be added in 2.8.6? Thanks, Steve -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at

[CMake] Does find_library check that a found library does in fact link?

2011-09-27 Thread Clifford Yapp
I've run into a situation where find_library is returning a symlink: /usr/lib/libblah.so - libblah.so.1 but libblah.so.1 does not actually exist (e.g. the symlink is bad). Is there an option I can set to have find_library ensure that a found library file is valid and links? Cheers, CY --

Re: [CMake] Does find_library check that a found library does in fact link?

2011-09-27 Thread Michael Wild
On 09/28/2011 02:44 AM, Clifford Yapp wrote: I've run into a situation where find_library is returning a symlink: /usr/lib/libblah.so - libblah.so.1 but libblah.so.1 does not actually exist (e.g. the symlink is bad). Is there an option I can set to have find_library ensure that a found

Re: [CMake] Does find_library check that a found library does in fact link?

2011-09-27 Thread Clifford Yapp
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/28/2011 02:44 AM, Clifford Yapp wrote: I've run into a situation where find_library is returning a symlink: /usr/lib/libblah.so - libblah.so.1 but libblah.so.1 does not actually exist (e.g. the symlink is

Re: [CMake] Does find_library check that a found library does in fact link?

2011-09-27 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Michael Wild wrote: On 09/28/2011 02:44 AM, Clifford Yapp wrote: I've run into a situation where find_library is returning a symlink: /usr/lib/libblah.so - libblah.so.1 but libblah.so.1 does not actually exist (e.g. the symlink is bad). Is there an option I can set to have

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v2.8.5-1976-g8751cb9

2011-09-27 Thread Alexander Neundorf
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, next has been updated via 8751cb9bbaa17902a9ffe30b18cfc2f1c7dce25c (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v2.8.5-514-gef8cc99

2011-09-27 Thread KWSys Robot
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project CMake. The branch, master has been updated via ef8cc9997cab748098bab52caf1ca038f90ec826 (commit) from