On 2/27/2012 3:17 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Anything left I should do before merging into next ?
The documentation of find_package() may need some modifications, I thought you
may want to have a look at that ?
I reverted FindPackage_ImprovedErrorMessages from next and
replaced it with
I understand the get_filename_component call here, but it does not
really need to use CACHE does it?
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 2/23/2012 4:39 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
From: Yury G. Kudryashovurkud.ur...@gmail.com
Applied, thanks:
The nightly binary for CMake is not building because of a test failure:
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=136868750build=2046004
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:52 (message):
Subversion_VERSION_SVN has unexpected content
Call Stack (most recent call first):
CMakeLists.txt:74
David Cole wrote:
What's the motivation here?
The motivation was to remove a class that has no useful methods. The only
useful method was AppendProperty, and it can be easily implemented in
cmPropertyMap.
This will likely conflict (logically, at compile time) with the
recently
2012/2/28 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com:
The nightly binary for CMake is not building because of a test failure:
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=136868750build=2046004
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:52 (message):
Subversion_VERSION_SVN has unexpected content
Call Stack
On 2/28/2012 1:14 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
2012/2/28 Bill Hoffmanbill.hoff...@kitware.com:
The nightly binary for CMake is not building because of a test failure:
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=136868750build=2046004
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:52 (message):
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 2/28/2012 1:14 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
2012/2/28 Bill Hoffmanbill.hoff...@kitware.com:
The nightly binary for CMake is not building because of a test failure:
On Monday 27 February 2012, Brad King wrote:
On 2/27/2012 3:37 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 02/27/2012 09:15 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
When the FooConfig.cmake has been found, Foo_FOUND is set to TRUE:
// Set a variable marking whether the package was found.
std::string
On 2/28/2012 1:38 PM, David Cole wrote:
Wait for Eike to reply here. He's been requiring version variables to
be set if the package is found in this test. I'm sure he'll either
patch this up so it works or exclude svn from the version variable
test depending on how hard it is to detect this
On 2/28/2012 1:53 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
No matter what
find_package(foo)
Can not cause an error at CMake time.
That isn't the line causing the error. It's the AllFindModules test
that wants to know that the returned version information is as expected.
This is a real test failure because
On 2/28/2012 1:48 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Do you think that needs a policy ?
I'm not sure. It's pretty obscure.
The code currently does:
// Set a variable marking whether the package was found.
std::string foundVar = this-Name;
foundVar += _FOUND;
On 2/28/2012 1:57 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 2/28/2012 1:53 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
No matter what
find_package(foo)
Can not cause an error at CMake time.
That isn't the line causing the error. It's the AllFindModules test
that wants to know that the returned version information is as
On 2/28/2012 2:09 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 2/28/2012 1:57 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 2/28/2012 1:53 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
That isn't the line causing the error. It's the AllFindModules test
that wants to know that the returned version information is as expected.
This is a real test failure
On 2/28/2012 8:24 AM, Brad King wrote:
I replaced the FindPackage_ModeWarning topic on the stage with a
[snip]
However, I'm not yet prepared to merge this to next. I'm going
to make more significant edits to the proposed changes and post
them as a separate topic and then report back here.
I
Hi!
I've published two branches on gitorious.
First, I run spellcheck on some source files.
git pull git://gitorious.org/~urkud1/cmake/urkud-cmake.git ready/fix-typos
Next, I fixed some doxygen formatting.
git pull git://gitorious.org/~urkud1/cmake/urkud-cmake.git ready/apidocs-
fixes
The last
On 2/28/2012 2:46 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
I've published two branches on gitorious.
Thanks for your work!
First, I run spellcheck on some source files.
git pull git://gitorious.org/~urkud1/cmake/urkud-cmake.git ready/fix-typos
Please combine those commits and write a single commit
On Tuesday 28 February 2012, Brad King wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:24 AM, Brad King wrote:
I replaced the FindPackage_ModeWarning topic on the stage with a
[snip]
However, I'm not yet prepared to merge this to next. I'm going
to make more significant edits to the proposed changes and post
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2012, 14:20:27 schrieb Brad King:
On 2/28/2012 2:09 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 2/28/2012 1:57 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 2/28/2012 1:53 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
That isn't the line causing the error. It's the AllFindModules test
that wants to know that the returned
Brad King wrote:
On 2/28/2012 2:46 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
git pull git://gitorious.org/~urkud1/cmake/urkud-cmake.git
ready/fix-typos
Please combine those commits and write a single commit message
that briefly explains the tools you ran to find the errors.
I've also renamed branch.
Brad King wrote:
On 2/25/2012 3:19 AM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
From: Yury G. Kudryashov
urkud.ur...@gmail.com
Mailman says that the next patch is too big. The compressed version is
attached.
While building I get:
This branch compiles with -Werror here:
git
On 2/28/2012 4:02 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
git pull git://gitorious.org/~urkud1/cmake/urkud-cmake.git run-vim-spellcheck
git pull git://gitorious.org/~urkud1/cmake/urkud-cmake.git doxygen-fixes
Thanks. I'll look at those topics when I get a chance.
We accept any form of patch that
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov
urkud.ur...@gmail.com wrote:
This branch compiles with -Werror here:
git pull git://gitorious.org/~urkud1/cmake/urkud-cmake.git add-const-
qualifiers
I still get warnings like:
Source/cmCommand.h:99:16: warning: ‘virtual bool
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13003
==
Reported By:Dave Whipp
Assigned To:
Hello list,
I'm quite new to CMake, still learning my way around... I currently
have the following in a CMakeList.txt file:
set(BOOST_LIBNAME boost_regex)
#set(BOOST_LIBNAME boost_regex-mt)
target_link_libraries(airspace ${BOOST_LIBNAME})
On some platforms, it only works if I set the
On 02/28/2012 10:00 AM, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote:
Hello list,
I'm quite new to CMake, still learning my way around... I currently
have the following in a CMakeList.txt file:
set(BOOST_LIBNAME boost_regex)
#set(BOOST_LIBNAME boost_regex-mt)
target_link_libraries(airspace
Hi Bart
Please keep answers on the list, so others can also profit from the
discussion.
On 02/28/2012 01:59 PM, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote:
On 02/28/2012 10:28 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
Don't do it this way. Use this:
find_package(Boost REQUIRED COMPONENTS regex)
Alright moving the include after did the trick, I get my code in the
final nsi file, as below:
set(CPACK_NSIS_EXTRA_INSTALL_COMMANDS
PageEx directory
DirVar PythonDir
PageExEnd
CreateShortCut \\\$DESKTOP${PROJECT_NAME}.lnk\\\
\\\$INSTDIRbuilt_eggrun.exe\\\
2012/2/28 Andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com:
Alright moving the include after did the trick, I get my code in the final
nsi file, as below:
set(CPACK_NSIS_EXTRA_INSTALL_COMMANDS
PageEx directory
DirVar PythonDir
PageExEnd
CreateShortCut
On 02/28/2012 03:42 PM, Eric Noulard wrote:
At worst is there a way to just create my own .nsi file and use it directly?
I need to create a page which simply asks for a directory to the user, and
then use that to create a shortcut..
Any idea (also other solutions might be fine).
1) Copy the
Dear all,
I am quite new to cmake and just started to setup cmake for a large
project, consisting of mainly fortran code. We use the Intel compiler,
version 12, for windows. This compiler supports the following code:
#include fpp-Windows-definition.inc
MODULE MSG
...
END MODULE
However, when
For a couple days now, I've been looking high and low at documentation about single-config CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE (e.g. Makefile) and multi-config CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES but I still have some questions.It seems that those variables are mutually exclusive, (depending on whether you're using single- or
...will reply later in detail.
Could you please go through the existing find-modules shipped with cmake which
support COMPONENTS and make a summary of how they handle them ?
At least FindQt4.cmake be default searches all components.
Thanks
Alex
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other
Hello Mr.Noulard!
Sorry for the late in reply. I had a 'miss configured' filter in my e-mail
dropping all mails.
1) Thanks for the explanation! I will take a look at the BundleUtilities,
once this is exactly what i need: a autonomous application.
2) I'm using CMake version '2.8.7'.
In Linux, i
Hello everybody!
Sorry for the late in reply. I had a 'miss configured' filter dropping all
my mails.
Thanks for all replies sent. All of them have great hints on how to solve
this problem.
But, after the Thielemans reply, i decided that the build type must be
selected from inside the Visual
I am trying to install two sub folders in my start menu links. I know that
(I think) CPACK_NSIS_MENU_LINKS doesn't support creating folders. I tried
using CPACK_NSIS_EXTRA_INSTALL, and that worked great, but my uninstaller
won't remove anything created in that SET call. Here is my code:
On 02/26/2012 09:18 AM, Andreas Guther wrote:
Hello,
I'm justing starting to learn/use CMake and I have a question regarding the
usage of it in regards of source tree structure and library usage.
I have the following folder structure:
Root
Bin
Win32X86Debug
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via d2d0ad76cba19b0ad93eb9beadfd8857aeb0c871 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 6c1f28618dc31610d4d3ebd06698a04074b15c98 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via 4fd479816da0a0ff21c6634ea7c82ff27b321b85 (commit)
from
39 matches
Mail list logo
