[CMake] Cmake and Win32 plugin linking issues.

G'day List, I've been happily cmakifing my opensource project and after a good success on *NIX (Yay! no more autotools) have run into a snag. We use a plugin system where our main binary loads a plugin eg an opengl renderer. On *NIX this is fine because you can have undefined symbols when you

Re: *NIX installation configuration (was [CMake] Cmake and Win32 plugin linking issues.)

On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 07:40 -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote: Jamie Jones said: When we used autotools, I used to pass the following options to the autotools to control binary locations etc: [...] Look for the DESTINATION option for the INSTALL command in the documentation at http

Re: *NIX installation configuration (was [CMake] Cmake and Win32 plugin linking issues.)

On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 23:32 -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote: set(infodir ${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/share/info CACHE PATH install location for info files ) gives a good (LFHS rather than autotools) default install location for info files which the user has the option to override using ccmake or

Re: [CMake] CMake Modules

of the module are. Just modified BSD license isn't really enough - what modifications could have been done to the BSD license - is it 2 clause (MIT/X style), 3 clause (New BSD) ? Regards, Yagisan, -- Jamie Jones Proprietor E-Yagi Consulting ABN: 32 138 593 410 Mob: +61 4 16 025 081 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [CMake] cmake license question (Was: CMake Modules)

how one person is out of touch with the rest of the world on what the GPL says. Pay no attention to that person. Regards, Yagisan -- Jamie Jones Proprietor E-Yagi Consulting ABN: 32 138 593 410 Mob: +61 4 16 025 081 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.eyagiconsulting.com GPG/PGP signed mail

Re: [CMake] cmake license question (Was: CMake Modules)

quite unwieldy if there are many contributors. The endorsement clause itself is fine. Regards, Yagisan -- Jamie Jones Proprietor E-Yagi Consulting ABN: 32 138 593 410 Mob: +61 4 16 025 081 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.eyagiconsulting.com GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail

Re: [CMake] cmake license question (Was: CMake Modules)

discussion on the lists. Regards, Yagisan -- Jamie Jones Proprietor E-Yagi Consulting ABN: 32 138 593 410 Mob: +61 4 16 025 081 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.eyagiconsulting.com GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments PGP Key ID 0x4B6E7209 Fingerprint E1FD

Re: [CMake] cmake license question (Was: CMake Modules)

On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 00:54 -0700, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: Jamie Jones wrote: It is rather clear that you don't like the GPL, that's fine - but ultimately the module authors decide what to license their work as. Really, you are making a mountain out of a molehill. Not really

Re: [CMake] cmake license question (Was: CMake Modules)

On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 03:55 -0700, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: Jamie Jones wrote: I do see your point, but [...] Do you believe that having GPL build scripts requires you to distribute the source to the application ? If so you are quite mistaken. You only need to distribute the source

RE: [CMake] cmake license question (Was: CMake Modules)

has done this so users must get cdrecord from his site and not, as he puts is a bastardised version from a *NIX distribution, as he seems very unhappy to see cdrecord modified. Regards, Yagisan -- Jamie Jones Proprietor E-Yagi Consulting ABN: 32 138 593 410 Mob: +61 4 16 025 081 Email: [EMAIL

Re: [CMake] elseif request

your proposal (1) would be useful for me. Regards, Yagisan -- Jamie Jones Proprietor E-Yagi Consulting ABN: 32 138 593 410 Mob: +61 4 16 025 081 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.eyagiconsulting.com GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments PGP Key ID 0x4B6E7209