On 05/31/2010 10:53 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Monday 31 May 2010, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
On 05/30/2010 02:13 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
That's also ok.
Could you please post the output of the IAR AVR and ARM assemblers when
called without any arguments here ?
(or put them into http
.
--
Jesper Eskilson
Developer
IAR Systems
http://www.iar.com
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
Hi,
I cannot get add_test to work as documented.
add_test(mytest MyExe)
correctly runs MyExe. However, if I try to use any of the generator
expressions (such as $CONFIGURATION), it fails:
add_test(mytest ${SOMEVARIABLE}/$CONFIGURATION/MyExe)
fails to locate MyExe correctly, since it
On 09/21/2010 01:30 PM, David Cole wrote:
$CONFIGURATION only works with the add_test(NAME mytest COMMAND
MyCommand) form of the add_test command.
But, when you use that form, you have to run ctest -C Release or
ctest -C Debug to choose a configuration when you run the tests.
Otherwise, tests
I'm trying to use the RULE_XXX properties to customize make output. Is
there a way to intercept ALL output from make, including the Build
target ..., Building C object..., etc., messages as well?
--
/Jesper
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit
On 10/14/2010 10:22 PM, Michał Czuczman wrote:
I would be interested in improving Java support in CMake. A source code
parser which finds out names of generated output object files, as in the
SCons Java support, is a must. That's what the current Java support in
CMake lacks the most. I've
submitted a bugreport about this:
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7062. It was submitted almost two
years ago, so I'm not sure it is getting very much attention by the
CMake people.
--
Jesper Eskilson
Developer
IAR Systems
___
Powered
of a hack, actually. Intercepting open(),
read(), and possibly mmap() should cover most cases.
--
Jesper Eskilson
Developer
IAR Systems
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
Timenkov Yuri wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I get several weird printouts in our build-server logs which I don't get
when I'm building from an (interactive) terminal:
Dependee
Timenkov Yuri wrote:
Anyway, the printout is inside a if(this-Verbose) { ... }, so
presumable it is something which can be switched on/off.
And it seems not a problem, because CMake just tells why it regenerates
dependencies.
But it clutters my make output. I like my make output to
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2008-09-17 09:10+0200 Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Timenkov Yuri wrote:
Anyway, the printout is inside a if(this-Verbose) { ... }, so
presumable it is something which can be switched on/off.
And it seems not a problem, because CMake just tells why it
regenerates
Hi all,
When CMake (2.6) discovers that a CMakeLists.txt file has changed, and
that one or more Visual Studio projects/solutions need to be reloaded,
it attempts to interrupt the build, force Visual Studio to reload the
projects, and then restart the build. This is really good compared to
Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 18:10:05 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
svn 'external' links to repositories (not tested). Do not know what is
the default behavior for branching...
I'd stay away from svn:externals. We used those extensively in my company, and
they are a
Eran Burstain wrote:
Hi !
We want to begin working with CMake in a large project, but we want to
have a regular Visual's sln-vcproj projects in the source control, for
users that cannot use CMake.
Can we activate CMake and force in to create all paths relative ?
This is a good starting
Due to some weirdness in Visual Studio, I need to be able to give the
resource compiler an absolute path:
rc ... -I${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/include
If I put
include_directories(${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/include)
CMake converts the absolute path to a relative one.
What is the weirdness?
Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com writes:
Gopala Krishna wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
wrote:
The progress reporting only supports one make at a time in the build tree.
-Bill
Is there any documentation somewhere on how the percentage
Michael Wild them...@gmail.com writes:
On 26. Jan, 2009, at 15:05, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com writes:
Gopala Krishna wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Bill Hoffman
bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
The progress reporting only supports one make
Eric Noulard wrote:
I should stop writing totally wrong advices for this for a while.
Let us know when you're going to start giving wrong advice again. Just
so we know. ;-)
--
/Jesper
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting the automatic project file reloading in
Visual Studio 2005 to work when running under Vista (Home Premium
64-bit). Reproduce:
* Open VS2005 + a solution generated by CMake
* Modify one of the CMakeLists.txt files.
* Rebuild solution
* Observed behavior:
Pierre-Julien Villoud wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to use the Eclipse CDT4 - MinGW Makefiles generator to
generate the Eclipse project files. My problem is that it is not
possible to choose the configuration (Debug or Release) from the
Eclipse platform. Is there any way to make this
I'm giving the CDT backend another shot, following the instructions at
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/Eclipse_CDT4_Generator. I'm using a dual
project setup with a build project and source project as described on
the wiki.
Is there a way to exclude the build project from being indexed? first,
my
I'm having some trouble in setting up our CMake-system to use MSYS
Makefiles together with cl.exe. The environments seems all setup, cl.exe
is found, but there is some trouble in detecting the compiler ABI info:
$ rm -f CMakeCache.txt cmake ../trunk/ -GMSYS Makefiles -DCMAKE_AR=ar
Bill Hoffman wrote:
Charlie Sun wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to do a linux build with both release and debug mode. In
stead of builing out of source as indicated on the FAQ 4.15, I really
need to do in the source build. currently, if I do a release build and
then a debug build and then another
On 05/24/2010 03:40 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 05/24/2010 11:20 AM, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Hi,
I have two targets, call them A and B. They both link with a third,
static library called C. C attempts to invoke a function which is
defined by however links with C, i.e. either A or B
On 05/25/2010 02:41 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
Exactly: The need for A's repetition in the link line is a sole affair
of A and C. Therefore, IMO, it should not be brought explicitly to D's
link line whereas an approach with two TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES() for the
A'n'C circular dependency and one
) 2.17.50.0.17.20070615
Copyright 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
...)
There is no such option. To extract the version number, you'll have to
run the assembler without options and filter the result through some
text-processing tool.
Same things goes for other IAR tools.
--
Jesper Eskilson
On 05/26/2010 05:17 PM, Michael Hertling wrote:
Will this still work with an executable E wich depends on B - C - B.
Won't C pull in A as well?
OK, I suppose, that means you have targets D *and* E in your project, D
links against A, E against B, A and B both link against C which finally
Torsten Martinsen wrote:
gga wrote:
KSpam wrote:
I agree that this is a Visual Studio issue; however, I am wondering
if anyone knows a workaround. I am not a Windows developer, but I
figured that someone on this list would have found a reasonable
solution.
Sure. Don't use Visual
Hi!
I've got a Visual Studio 8 solution generated by CMake where one of the
projects is always being relinked everytime I build it, even when
nothing in it has changed (i.e. if I try to build it twice, it always
relinks the project the second time).
I've studied the build logs, but they do not
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On 9/4/07, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I've got a Visual Studio 8 solution generated by CMake where one of the
projects is always being relinked everytime I build it, even when
nothing in it has changed (i.e. if I try to build it twice, it always
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On 9/4/07, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I've got a Visual Studio 8 solution generated by CMake where one of the
projects is always being relinked everytime I build it, even when
nothing in it has changed (i.e. if I try to build
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Mike Jackson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 3:03 AM, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
A related question: if I include an external project in my solution
using
include_external_msproject(Bar ../../Bar/Bar.vcproj)
can I later refer to this project using
target_link_libraries(Foo
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Mike Jackson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 3:03 AM, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
A related question: if I include an external project in my solution
using
include_external_msproject(Bar ../../Bar/Bar.vcproj)
can I later refer to this project using
Hi,
If I tell CMake to generate Visual Studio 8 project files, CMake
requires that the right cl.exe can be found in PATH. More
specifically, if the wrong cl.exe is found in PATH (say from Visual
Studio 7), then CMake just pukes with some strange error.
This confuses several of my users (who
What does the following error message mean:
Re-run cmake no build system arguments
--
/Jesper
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Is there any way for CMake to set environment variables which can be
picked up in Visual Studio's pre/post-build steps?
I'm working on a system where I've got a couple of studio project
included via the INCLUDE_EXTERNAL_MSPROJECT(), and I would like to be
able to refer to things like
Stefan Buschmann wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently having a problem using the HTMLHelp Compiler (hhc.exe) in
my CMake-Scripts. I build the doxygen docs, then call hhc.exe and the
.chm file is created correctly.
But hhc.exe seems to return an error code, so the build has failed and
my post-build
Sylvain Benner wrote:
Is there any way for CMake to set environment variables which can be
picked up in Visual Studio's pre/post-build steps?
I'm working on a system where I've got a couple of studio project
included via the INCLUDE_EXTERNAL_MSPROJECT(), and I would like to be
able to
Bill Hoffman wrote:
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Is there any way for CMake to set environment variables which can be
picked up in Visual Studio's pre/post-build steps?
I'm working on a system where I've got a couple of studio project
included via the INCLUDE_EXTERNAL_MSPROJECT(), and I would like
Hi people,
Is there a way to disable the CMake cache, i.e. prevent CMake from
generating or reading CMakeCache.txt?
--
/Jesper
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
Bill Hoffman wrote:
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Hi people,
Is there a way to disable the CMake cache, i.e. prevent CMake from
generating or reading CMakeCache.txt?
No.
But, it might help more if you gave an explanation of what you are
trying to do?
The first problem is that the Visual
Bill Hoffman wrote:
OK, so you want to disable the rerun of CMake, not the cache. That can
be done with the CMAKE_SUPPRESS_REGENERATION variable. (set it to TRUE).
Yes, I know how to use this variable.
You should never have to clear out the cache.
If I make a change in CMakeLists.txt
Bill Hoffman wrote:
For this case, you could have something like this:
# if SOME_PROGRAM has a value but the program has been moved
# or removed from the system, then clear the cache entry
# so that find_program will try again.
if(SOME_PROGRAM AND NOT EXISTS ${SOME_PROGRAM})
set(SOME_PROGRAM
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2007, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
BTW: Are there any plans of fixing the broken regeneration for Visual
Studio? Or at least documenting it as known problem? As it is now,
the project files are regenerated but not reloaded, and there is no
feedback
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 01.11.07 10:49:12, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
In any case, the automatic regeneration of project files *does* *not*
*work*, and my question was simply if there was a plan for either doing
something about it (such as disabling it per default, which would be a
sensible
Brandon Van Every wrote:
I'm trying to grab the cl.exe banner so I can determine the MSVC
version number. If cl.exe is in the path, then the following works at
a Windows Command Prompt. This gives a short banner with the VC
version number and copyright.
cl /? 2 banner.txt
But when I try to
Bill Hoffman wrote:
So, I did look at how to fix this some. I have a c# program that can
force a running visual studio process to close and reload the solution
it has. The idea would be to have cmake run this when cmake is run as
part of the build. However, visual studio has a neat trick
Dizzy wrote:
On Monday 19 November 2007 18:37:02 Josef Karthauser wrote:
Is it possible (with relative easy) to have cmake send all output to
stderr instead of stdout?
Well on a bourne shell I think you can do:
cmake /path/to/sources 12
And it will run cmake redirecting fd 1 (stdout)
Bill Hoffman wrote:
You can also use the GNU make included here:
http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/
This is really just a (small) set of unix tools running natively under
Windows, using native Windows paths, etc. IMO this is the easiest way
to get GNU make for Windows.
Don't use the GNU
Cees Wesseling wrote:
Hi,
It seems that that is frequently requested feature for gcc but alas
it is not implemented for gcc. Hence I am looking for another option
to disable optimization op a per file level.
To specify file-specific compiler flags, use set_source_file_properties:
Brandon Van Every wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 2:47 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As DSL based on Lua != Lua, assuming Kitware gets rid of
documentation and bugs in the language might be too optimistic. Look
for example at RHDL (http://rhdl.rubyforge.org/): it's a Ruby-based
DSL
James Bigler wrote:
Is it possible to force a custom target to be verbose in makefile mode?
I know I can turn it on or off for a given project, but I want to do for
only a single target (a custom target, in fact).
If you're using GNU make you can use target-specific variables:
Olumide wrote:
Hello -
I'm a CMake newbie and I'd appreciate help creating a makefile *from* a
Visual Studio .NET 2003 project/solution. I'm trying like to migrate my
projects to eclipse and I hope CMake will help make that transition.
Many thanks,
- Olumide
PS: I've already tried
Josef Karthauser wrote:
Is this a bug?
EXECUTE_PROCESS(
COMMAND badcmd_that_doesnt_exist
ERROR_VARIABLE ERROR
)
IF(ERROR)
MESSAGE(FATAL_ERROR Error! Command doesn’t exist.)
ENDIF(ERROR)
as the fatal_error is never raised.
Olumide wrote:
Bill Hoffman wrote:
I'm trying to generate a Unix style (or NMake) Makefile that I can
use to port my visual studio project to eclipse. I've tried running
cmake on the project directory with the -GUnix Makefiles and
-GNMake Makefiles option, but its not working -- I'm getting
WangPing wrote:
The date /time on my local workstation is correct, probably due to NFS
system,
Do you mean NTP? NFS does not keep your local computer time correct.
the work directory is a NFS folder on other server, maybe the
date/time on this server is incorrect? I can check it later.
Karthik Krishnan wrote:
Your system time is probably incorrect. One possible reason is that the
timestamp of the files that make is compiling is newer than the current
time.
If the local time is correct and no network filesystems are involved,
then I would guess that there is a file
Eric Noulard wrote:
2007/12/11, Jason Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is not scientific but I wrote a quick perl script to compile a
simple library that we use (GCTPc). It consists of 70 C files with most
of the files between 5K and 6K, a few are as large as 70K. The script
just uses the time()
Brandon Van Every wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 7:05 PM, David Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now this thread is just plain cool.
:-)
Wait until I start building up a more advanced metaprogramming
language from raw regular expressions. That idea occurred to me last
night. I know regexes really
Felix Obenhuber wrote:
Dear CMake developer and users,
I've encountered some probs with a an issue whitch already raised last
year in the a post [1].
Mingw32-make (5.1.3) minds about a too long linker line.
To be picky, mingw32-make (i.e. GNU make) doesn't mind at all, but
cmd.exe might.
Brandon Van Every wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 2:55 PM, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please let us know when you've implemented a webserver in CMake. ;-)
It'll never happen. I can't stand the web. I'm a 3D / ASM / AI /
game / build system guy. To me, the web has always been
Felix Obenhuber wrote:
On Do, 2007-12-20 at 21:02 +0100, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
To be picky, mingw32-make (i.e. GNU make) doesn't mind at all, but
cmd.exe might. (Mingw32-make will happily use any bourne-shell it can
get its hands on.)
You're absolutely right. The problem is, that we're
Mike Jackson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
Git - straight from Linus.. Kinda long but interesting.. as long as
you can get past Linus' personality.
Here are my two cents:
I actually held Linus opinion in rather high regard until he went
berzerk on how bad Subversion is.
Steven Van Ingelgem wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering why there are no VS makefiles? (run like nmake -f project.mak).
I know you could run them from the command prompt with something like
devenv ..., but that is not exactly the same ;-).
Are you just being curious, or do you have a concrete
Hi all,
I'm getting repeated questions from other developers at my company about
why the project files CMake generates for Visual Studio aren't movable,
so I sat down, created a minimal project, switched on the
CMAKE_USE_RELATIVE_PATHS flag, and ran cmake. It turns out that there
are
Brandon Van Every wrote:
Someone asked me the other day why CMake doesn't do this. I thought I
gave him a reasonable answer, that it would be painful to do, and that
CMake -- native is a much easier problem than native -- CMake. But
I said I would ask here for other people's opinions on it. I
Brandon Van Every wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/SCons-Future-Directions-and-Thoughts-td15176258.html
you can learn tons about SCons from that thread.
And there's one *really* spectacular public flame, if you
Michael Wild wrote:
Does anyone of you have an idea how to solve the cyclic dependency
problem in a more elegant way or how to recycle objects?
Yep. Look here:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/kkt2hd12.aspx
--
/Jesper
___
CMake mailing
I've found a weird behavior which appears when trying to redefine the
CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES variable under the following conditions:
- The cmake.exe frontend is used
- A Visual Studio generator is used
- CMake 2.6 RC5, probably previous versions as well
Given the following CMakeLists.txt
Eric Torstenson wrote:
Hi All,
I'm compiling my application on 4 platforms (linux 32 bit, linux 64 bit,
windows and mac) I would like to use my linux source tree for all of
them without having to recompile the whole thing each time I change from
one platform to the next.
Is there a way to
Phil Pellouchoud wrote:
I have a *static library* that is giving the following warning:
LNK4221
Is there a way to tell cmake to add
/IGNORE:4221
Sorry, but there is no /IGNORE option to LIB. Afaik, LIB does not have
an option for disabling warnings. If you find one, please let
Bill Hoffman wrote:
David Sveningsson wrote:
Hi, more newbie questions. The GNU Makefiles generated CMake has some
nice colored output, progress etc. However I would like to disable
this and see each command that is run (debugging purpose).
There is no way to turn it off. You can do make
Bill Hoffman wrote:
Feel free to create a feature request. Please describe how the
replaceable utility would work.
Done:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=7062
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
Bill Hoffman wrote:
OK, thanks. I am not sure how -j N will be fixed by this, but the other
stuff sounds good. I think we are sort of stuck with the jumbled
output with parallel make. Unless you got really complicated with some
sort of client server setup.
I'm not sure how things work
I'm trying to add some tests to a project which is mainly built on
Windows using Visual Studio. The problem I have is how to locate the
binary used to run the test. The path to the binary depends on the
Visual Studio macro $(ConfigurationName), so when I run ctest I get:
$ vcbuild
Hi!
Is there any way to get NMake Makefiles to show the exact compiler
options used? If I do
nmake VERBOSE=yes
I only see that cl is executed like this:
[...]/cl.exe @commandfile
but the command file is removed when nmake exits.
I'm having trouble setting CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS[_CONFIG] properly.
What is the easiest way of using cl.exe with one of the GNU make based
generators? I've tried
cmake -G MinGW Makefiles -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=cl.exe ...
but could never really get it to work.
--
/Jesper
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
Hi all,
I'm curious about the design of the current makefile generator, and
why it was designed the way it was. I've tried searching the mailing
list archive, but without any greater success.
One question pops to mind: why invoke use so many levels of recursive
make? I counted at least three
2007/4/18, Bill Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm curious about the design of the current makefile generator, and
why it was designed the way it was. I've tried searching the mailing
list archive, but without any greater success.
One question pops to mind: why
2007/4/19, Bill Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Can you (or anyone else) elaborate on this? What features are abscent
from other makes which are necessary to avoid recursive make calls?
I've got a fair amount of experience of writing complex makefiles for
gmake, but very
Hi all,
If a post-build command fails, the associated target is not rebuilt
(This holds at least for the NMake and Visual Studio generators). This
is very annoying, as it makes it impossible to be sure that everything
is in place unless I do a complete rebuild.
Is there any way to fix this?
--
Hi all,
I tried following the instructions on the wiki on how to define my own
build type (configuration), however the new build type (Develop)
does not show up as a valid solution configuration in Visual Studio.
Why is that?
--
/Jesper
___
CMake
2007/5/18, Joshua Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Hi all,
I tried following the instructions on the wiki on how to define my own
build type (configuration), however the new build type (Develop)
does not show up as a valid solution configuration in Visual Studio.
Why
Hi all,
I'm wondering about how (large) CMake projects handle the install
phase with respect to incremental building and debugging. Do people
always install before running/testing/debugging, or is it common to
be able to run/test/debug directly from the build output directory?
I would ideally
2007/6/6, Sylvain Benner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jon W a écrit :
Are there any tools available to convert Visual Studio files to
cmakelists.txt? I have hundreds of vcproj files and this would help
make the conversion to cmake easier.
I don't know if there are some tools to do this. If you don't
Hi all,
I would like to be able to create a static library on Windows which
includes an import library to a DLL, so that users of the static
library do not need to specify the import library.
CMake does not allow me to do this.
TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES( FooLib BarLib )
does not work when
2007/6/7, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/7/07, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to be able to create a static library on Windows which
includes an import library to a DLL, so that users of the static
library do not need to specify the import library
2007/6/7, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/6/7, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/7/07, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to be able to create a static library on Windows which
includes an import library to a DLL, so that users
2007/6/12, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Jesper,
On Thursday 07 June 2007 08:38, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
...
I've written a simple hack in Ruby which extracts the most vital parts of a
.vcproj file and generates a corresponding CMakeLists.txt. There are a lot
of things it doesn't
2007/6/12, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On some platforms, I bet the underlying linker AR can't even do it. I
know it can't put static libraries inside of static libraries, thats' why
everyone wants convenience libraries and I had to work on all that object
file fakery. Possibly it
Forgot to cc the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-jun-13 19:56
Subject: Re: [CMake] creating static library with references to other .lib files
To: Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007/6/13, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED
2007/6/14, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/13/07, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/6/13, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But why don't you just ship your users a dynamic lib? As far as I
know, there are no restrictions on dynamic libs including static libs
2007/6/15, kitts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 14 Jun 2007 12:23:07 pm Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Is it really impossible to pass an option to the linker when creating a
static library?
I have not gone through the whole thread but i think the function
SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES(TARGET LINK_FLAGS XYZ
Hi,
In my CMake installation on Windows, there are two directory with
seemingly identical contents:
c:/Program Files/CMake 2.4/share/CMake
c:/Program Files/CMake 2.4/share/cmake-2.4
Could someone care to explain the difference?
--
/Jesper
___
CMake
2007/6/14, David Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's advanced CMake use, but you might want to have a look at overriding
the CMake rule variable CMAKE_CXX_CREATE_STATIC_LIBRARY.
(Or _C_ if it's C source code.) You should be able to add some linker flags
in there, although they may apply to all static
Hi all,
I'm trying to get our header files to show up in Visual Studio. I
though I could just do
add_library(foo foo.cpp foo.h)
but Visual Studio tries to compile my header file as if it was a .cpp
file. What am I doing wrong?
--
/Jesper
___
CMake
Hi,
When can the improvements discussed in bug #4145 be expected to make
it into a CMake release?
--
/Jesper
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
2007/6/25, Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get our header files to show up in Visual Studio. I
though I could just do
add_library(foo foo.cpp foo.h)
but Visual Studio tries to compile my header file as if it was a .cpp
file. What am I doing wrong?
--
/Jesper
Since
2007/7/2, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 02 July 2007 08:05, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a way to extract the list of library dependencies specified
by target_link_libraries for a target? I would like to be able to pass
the list of libraries to an external
99 matches
Mail list logo
