.7.2-1 500
500 http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian stretch/main armhf Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
(possibly your /etc/apt/sources* setup does not have
working/updated info for stretch/main repo?)
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
--
Das "S" in "IoT" steht für &
gt; The same project is generated without errors on Windows 7 with Visual Studio
> generators and other projects are also generated without errors on the same
> Linux machine.
>
> Does anyone knows the source of that error?
Rimshot idea:
Quite possibly someone did a
project(foo C C
for any manual tweaking (in all sufficiently standard
cases)
avoided in all future deployments...
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support
this naming pattern though)
- it's extremely compiler-specific (read: not environment-generic)
So, I would recommend going the improve external tool support route instead
(or resort to figuring out CMake config mechanisms to generically
switch object naming).
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered
choose
to provide generic IDL support on its own eventually).
HTH (got milk?),
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
,
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake
(_ctest_add_test_sanitized _target)
endif(cmake_add_test_command_signature_supported_)
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake
, by simply directly adding link instructions there -
but that could arguably be quite a bit less clean
than providing internal helper functions to abstract certain internal
decisions...
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
(perhaps marker file stored on a temp fs).
So, IOW, the installer option would only need to have the capability
of creating those marker signals somehow (in case the user selected the
corresponding option),
then the unconditionally executed scripts would react on those (not) existing.
HTH,
Andreas
use c).
HTH - anything else?
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe
target_link_libraries(${Target} ${SQLITE3_LIBRARIES}))
)
whenever needing to analyze why things fail.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ
macro/helper (to be implemented by a module) which will do that per-file
processing, *with* *correct* *directory* *arguments* *each*
(implicitly!).
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
--
GNU/Linux. It's not the software that's free, it's you.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects
CMake's
pre-installed modules, i.e. INSTALL_PREFIX/share/cmake-VER/Modules/Platform/ ,
since *this* is where the game gets played, i.e. where all the magic
happens, thus that is the authoritative place to start investigating about
custom platform setup questions.
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered
expectations about
that behaviour. OTOH you seem to indicate it's specific to certain
generators only, thus behaviour over various generator types *is* varied already
thus people should have known to deal properly with it.
Thus: thanks for that fix,
Andreas Mohr
--
GNU/Linux. It's not the software
. implicit generated file hookup does not work,
thus one needs an explicit *target* for that conversion handling,
and then explicitly let something else depend on that target, or so).
But then what do I know... ;)
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects
package,
so there might easily be enough infrastructure support for Qt cross compile
to make it a worthwhile modus operandi.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic
it might be useful to devise a standard parameterization
mechanism for --build to support *any* such attributes, in a generalized form.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages
be logging this stuff too (to send to cdash for
example) so this is kind of a responsible choice.
Indeed, that possibly gets decided via the controlling terminal's features.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
;)
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:44:35PM +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 30 April 2013, Andreas Mohr wrote:
Consider /opt/local/lib/cmake/OpenCVConfig-version.cmake
Visit /opt/local/lib/cmake/OpenCVConfig-version.cmake/
CheckDirectory (dir /opt/local/lib/cmake/OpenCVConfig
to
have a look at this case... (some sizeable infrastructure extension
probably required)
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
probably a pipe dream in many situations.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link
the changed/added parts,
or figure them out manually (obviously less reliable),
or send both files to someone who can analyze it this way.
Thanks for the report!
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
...@aol.com)
Good luck!
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe
, IIRC I ended up with several absolute
paths in project files despite having activated CMAKE_USE_RELATIVE_PATHS.
I'm rather tempted to start improving on this situation
once some of my other CMake work items are handled.
Andreas Mohr
--
GNU/Linux. It's not the software that's free, it's you
}
PARENT_SCOPE)
endfunction(sbuild_configure_batch_scriptlet_debug_flag_get
_out_debug_flag_content)
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
--
GNU/Linux. It's not the software that's free, it's you.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
install step being the wrong place
to do such things.
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
(CTEST_BUILD_NAME Linux_Standart_Valgrind)
Standard, *pretty please* ;)
#set cMake command to be used
SET(CTEST_CMAKE_COMMAND \${CMAKE_EXECUTABLE_NAME}\)
Hmm, does this really need specific manual extra escaped quoting? Just
asking...
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
--
GNU/Linux. It's not the software that's free, it's
for it to end up as quote-only, which the
cmVisualStudioGeneratorOptionsEscapeForXML() conversion handling
already accounted for but obviously did not match in this case!).
Best,
François Best
Hardware Software Engineer
Better? :)
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other
up more precise (read: successful)
than the previous fruitless attempts.
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org
CMake = 2.8.8 (AFAIR) now finally has a target-specific (i.e.
non-directory scope) INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES property for specifying these
things.
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please
directory code and configure your local targets with these
[plus, for possibly target-specific configuration done by the Config file,
provide a dummy victim target to gather these values from]
This mechanism is so stupendously daring that it might just happen to work ;)
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered
to be, but there might be hidden
niceties lurking
(and this is what the dashboard test result likely hints at).
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check
of your own that has it enabled. Simply turn on the
advanced cache option CMAKE_ENABLE_NINJA when configuring CMake.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check
wx2.4 build compat config flag
(and thus end up with incompatible vtable ABI issues).
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
of the community-maintained
(see related tracker item) PCH support Module within my vcproj2cmake repo
(since there are very obvious usage synergies), and I plan to keep it current.
Of course I'm fully aware that you'd like to see improved CMake-builtin
support instead...
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered
way to verify define existence would obviously be a more _manual_
compile setup
of a dummy source plus header include.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check
rather than TARGET-side attributes]
Thus spake someone who still hasn't found the time to implement
at least a semi-usable/-supported (static) CMake way
of platform configuration type dependent switching in his V2C converter... :-P
(1 year old bug report and counting)
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered
...@dough.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Andreas Mohr wrote:
I'd think that Debug/Release isn't all that matters -
what discussions all too conveniently leave out (possibly even the KDE
Wiki-side target config discussion!) is platform-specific handling,
too (Win32
is to push the package
to some APT pool server out there (possibly even your own),
then have a user add that URL to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/
and install everything automatically via apt-get your_package_name
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http
() should provide exactly that.
I.e. configure_file() from original file to the destination file
which you then file(STRINGS...), and it should trigger re-configure
whenever the original file changed.
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http
compiles a
binary for windows). You can see the command and the error below.
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/local/install/bpp/windows -
CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/usr/local/i386-mingw32-4.3.0/bin/i386-mingw32-g++
Would possibly be useful to specify the second variable via -D, too :)
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
,
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org
CMakeCache.txt ]]] unit_tests_all
fi
Andreas Mohr
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link
is lost, and things
have to be rerun (best done via a manual ${CMAKE_COMMAND} .),
as clearly opposed to what happens in the Makefile case,
where the generated build environment is still left alive
and you can simply restart build via make.
Andreas Mohr
dependencies? ;-
(whoa, that perhaps was almost as severe as an ad-hominem ;)
Thanks a lot again for your very valuable work!
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:33:01PM +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:12:55 AM Andreas Mohr wrote:
Depending on actual implementation of CMake (whether it has some caching
logic or not), this might be woefully inefficient,
causing a possibly _filesystem
, but in this case it could make a difference...
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
or implicitly pathed)
(or alternatively include a Use file which _both_ includes Config file
_and_ then activates these include paths for the local project)
Or, more specifically, Z would somehow make sure to evaluate
AConfig.cmake and BConfig.cmake.
Andreas Mohr
?
- add these things to a new bug# for implementation
Done Deal?
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check
well be orders of magnitude bigger than mine
(perhaps many more small targets), which could explain the difference.
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:11:53AM +, Mike McQuaid wrote:
On 22 December 2010 22:24, Andreas Mohr a...@lisas.de wrote:
To put it simply, I was just not happy the entire time while
trying to implement this and not finding any satisfying (well-crafted)
solution,
only ugly, very bad
with the sufficiently large
infrastructure that I was able to create, it's just that many areas
feel wanting (the entire BundleUtilities / install-time stuff
is an example of that, too).
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
working ok so far.
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
.
(not that anyone unclever enough would ever happen to read these files
before getting rid of them in sub-seconds, but...)
The fact that it can't create a directory alone makes cmake freak out almost
immediately.
Interesting variant - seems like there are a hundred ways to Rome ;)
Andreas Mohr
working) CPack RPM setup off-list if wanted.
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
,
then it's probably possible to use --dtdvalid on a DTD (as hopefully
published for VS2005/08/10 etc.).
Unless that's still not precise enough for full validation of all
content.
Obviously this should best be made a mandatory post-build step prior to release.
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
cmake -E touch
the CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_FILE, somehow during target building
or some such.
This is quite certainly not the most direct (nor elegant!) way
to force a reconfiguration (any ideas how to force it directly?),
but in some situations such a reconfiguration might help.
Andreas Mohr
project space (and as said
above this is working sufficiently well),
however I might eventually change this to split off some suitable parts.
HTH, coming from someone with possibly rather similar conditions.
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit
the cmake_check_build_system step.
Any clever ideas?
Currently using 2.6.4 mostly, but that's certainly not a limiting issue.
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
/nologo ${COMPILE_DEFINITIONS}
Invalid escape sequence \V
Likely someone forgot to use a VERBATIM somewhere.
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
(Google searches in the couple
hundreds, vcproj2cmake adaptation of a _large_ project etc.).
Suggestion for the sake of world peace: I'll submit a patch for that man
page, ok? :)
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open
won't need these).
OTOH your issue might be the split between Fortran and C++ components,
in which case even CMAKE_LINKER might fail to help in all cases
(in that case perhaps there's a target-specific property to set
which defines the linker to use for the target).
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
way (though I still haven't tried it yet ;).
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
} or ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/...
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:10:37AM +0200, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
On 06/14/2010 05:00 PM, Andreas Mohr wrote:
Frankly the entire distinction between CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES
and CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE remains one of the more confusing things,
as can be witnessed in several confused postings about
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:00:47PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:54:58AM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
To be compatible with CMake, I would say a BSD license would be the
best. gitorious might be a good starting place. We tried the converter
here
manage to influence evaluation of the parent project's name.
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check
having to add exceptions to the CMake config in
the sub project whenever the parent project name / specifics change.
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
licensing as GPL seems out of the question (though not entirely sure
how a special script project would be affected by GPL regulations),
and LGPL seems to be the goal. Rrrright!?
Both scripts are attached.
Any comments or ideas?
Thank you for a great build environment,
Andreas Mohr
on how to add one's implementation to
the script ;)
Andreas Mohr
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
71 matches
Mail list logo