Hi all,
I got a simple question,
What is idea behind target property LINK_FLAGS?
When I add linker flag e.g --no-undefined then cmake is not alligning
it to real linker that will be used during linking.
for example --no-undefined is a valid ld switch, but when I specify it
LINK_FLAGS it will
On 04/18/2011 03:25 PM, Łukasz Tasz wrote:
Hi all,
I got a simple question,
What is idea behind target property LINK_FLAGS?
When I add linker flag e.g --no-undefined then cmake is not alligning
it to real linker that will be used during linking.
for example --no-undefined is a valid
I got a simple question,
What is idea behind target property LINK_FLAGS?
When I add linker flag e.g --no-undefined then cmake is not alligning
it to real linker that will be used during linking.
for example --no-undefined is a valid ld switch, but when I specify it
LINK_FLAGS it will not
Am Montag 18 April 2011, 15:25:24 schrieb Łukasz Tasz:
Hi all,
I got a simple question,
What is idea behind target property LINK_FLAGS?
When I add linker flag e.g --no-undefined then cmake is not alligning
it to real linker that will be used during linking.
for example --no-undefined
Hi,
Of course I read manual. But I'm a little bit confused. That's why I'm
asking about idea behind LINK_FLAGS,
Cmake is not consequent because when I'm adding:
add_library(test foo.cxx bar.cxx)
SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES( test PROPERTIES SOVERSION 1.2 VERSION 1.1)
it 'magicaly knows' how to build
On 04/18/2011 07:37 PM, Łukasz Tasz wrote:
Hi,
Of course I read manual. But I'm a little bit confused. That's why I'm
asking about idea behind LINK_FLAGS,
Cmake is not consequent because when I'm adding:
add_library(test foo.cxx bar.cxx)
SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES( test PROPERTIES SOVERSION
