On 11/12/2011 01:39 PM, David Cole wrote:
For reference, the bug Mike refers to is this one:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11258
I always use the manual technique of shutting down VS, running CMake,
and then re-opening VS. It's really not that bad, once you get used to
it.
For reference, the bug Mike refers to is this one:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11258
I always use the manual technique of shutting down VS, running CMake,
and then re-opening VS. It's really not that bad, once you get used to
it.
David C.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:48 PM,
On 12 November 2011 12:39, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
For reference, the bug Mike refers to is this one:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11258
I always use the manual technique of shutting down VS, running CMake,
and then re-opening VS. It's really not that bad, once
That's what we do to.
It basically comes down to the inconvenience of having to do that with
Visual Studio being outweighed (considerably!) by the cross-platform
benefits of CMake. (It does help that none of our developers use Windows
as their primary development platform, so it only comes up
It basically comes down to the inconvenience of having to do that with
Visual Studio being outweighed (considerably!) by the cross-platform
benefits of CMake. (It does help that none of our developers use Windows as
their primary development platform, so it only comes up when we make sure
On 11/12/2011 10:51 AM, John Drescher wrote:
It basically comes down to the inconvenience of having to do that with
Visual Studio being outweighed (considerably!) by the cross-platform
benefits of CMake. (It does help that none of our developers use Windows as
their primary development
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 11/12/2011 10:51 AM, John Drescher wrote:
It basically comes down to the inconvenience of having to do that with
Visual Studio being outweighed (considerably!) by the cross-platform
benefits of CMake. (It does
On Nov 12, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 11/12/2011 10:51 AM, John Drescher wrote:
It basically comes down to the inconvenience of having to do that with
Visual Studio being outweighed (considerably!) by the cross-platform
benefits of CMake. (It does help that none of our
I typically work in KDevelop which has CMake support, so if another
developer pushes some new files and changes to the CMakeLists.txt of
my project, I simply 'git pull' the project and then click Build and
it knows exactly what to do - it runs CMake and then builds the
project.
However, when
It is worse and better.
1: CMake will generate the VS projects and solutions every time it needs to
run. DO NOT EDIT the generated VS projects and solutions. Add the requirements
to the CMake files.
2: If you are on VS2007/VS2008 and you do a git pull and then switch to VS
and click build a
10 matches
Mail list logo