The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.itk.org/Bug/view.php?id=12589
==
Reported By:Andreas Mohr
Assigned To:
2011/11/22 Peter Collingbourne pe...@pcc.me.uk
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:02:54AM +0100, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:05 PM, OKUMURA Yuki m...@cltn.org wrote:
(Sorry Bill, i repost here..)
2011/11/16 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com:
- snip -
What
On 11/22/2011 4:39 PM, Brad King wrote:
It is tempting to always require explicit requests for new TRE behavior,
such as using TRE instead of REGEX in keyword locations, but one
advantage of using a policy is that over time the old behavior will
disappear completely from usage.
I am pretty
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
On 11/22/2011 4:39 PM, Brad King wrote:
It is tempting to always require explicit requests for new TRE behavior,
such as using TRE instead of REGEX in keyword locations, but one
advantage of using a policy is that
On 11/23/2011 11:43 AM, James Bigler wrote:
Why can't this be solved with a policy? One problem of using an
explicit TRE command is that if you want to write code that *could* be
used in an older version of CMake you won't be able to use it.
It could be, but that will not come without pain.
On 11/23/2011 12:06 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 11/23/2011 11:43 AM, James Bigler wrote:
Why can't this be solved with a policy? One problem of using an
explicit TRE command is that if you want to write code that *could* be
used in an older version of CMake you won't be able to use it.
It
Hi Bill,
On 2011-11-23, at 10:36 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
I am pretty sure the last time we talked about adding a new regex we talked
about requiring explicit requests. I think this would be a much safer
approach. I am really scared that this regex will not be compatible with the
old
On 11/23/2011 12:20 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
to compile ITK using CMake+TRE. And there was at least one regex that
TRE refused to compile.
What was it, and where in the ITK code is it?
Thanks,
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
On 2011-11-23, at 12:24 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:20 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
to compile ITK using CMake+TRE. And there was at least one regex that
TRE refused to compile.
What was it, and where in the ITK code is it?
The regex in question is:
^[^][:/*?]+\$
And it
On 11/23/2011 12:34 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
The regex in question is:
^[^][:/*?]+\$
And it appears at this location in the ITK source tree:
CMake/ExternalData.cmake:347
And the expression is correct, because you're allowed to have the ]
metacharacter inside a [^xyz] class if
On 11/23/2011 12:43 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:34 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
The regex in question is:
^[^][:/*?]+\$
And it appears at this location in the ITK source tree:
CMake/ExternalData.cmake:347
And the expression is correct, because you're allowed to have the
On 11/23/2011 12:48 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:43 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:34 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
The regex in question is:
^[^][:/*?]+\$
To include a literal ] in the list, make it either the first item
It must be the [: in this regex that TRE sees as
On 11/23/2011 12:51 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:48 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:43 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:34 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
The regex in question is:
^[^][:/*?]+\$
To include a literal ] in the list, make it either the first item
It
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:51 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:48 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:43 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:34 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
The regex in question is:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:51 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:48 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:43 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:34 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
The regex in question is:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:09 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:51 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:48 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:43 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Sean McBride s...@rogue-research.com wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:03:20 -0500, Bill Hoffman said:
For 99% of folks the current regex is just fine.
AFAICT, this performance bug affects 100% of Xcode generator users. Even
looking at CMake's dashboard, you can
On 11/23/2011 5:43 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:44 PM, Brad King wrote:
However, the above does not need to stand in the way of solving the
problem you're addressing. We can simply set that goal aside for
now by not exposing TRE in the CMake language anywhere. Use it
just for
On 11/24/2011 12:34 AM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 5:43 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:44 PM, Brad King wrote:
However, the above does not need to stand in the way of solving the
problem you're addressing. We can simply set that goal aside for
now by not exposing TRE in the CMake
19 matches
Mail list logo
