Hello CMake devs,
At what stage is it OK to go ahead and merge codeite-ide-generator topic to
the next branch as described by the wiki:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake/Git/Develop#Merge_a_Topic_for_Testing ?
Or can I go ahead and merge it for testing?
Thanks,
Eran
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:22
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14690
==
Reported By:Arunmozhi
Assigned To:
If all the tests pass for you locally, and you are pretty sure they
will all pass on other machines too, then you can do it whenever you
think it's ready. (Unless somebody else has given you feedback that you
need to address first...)
The primary thing is to monitor the Continuous dashboards
On Wednesday 08 January 2014, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 07 January 2014, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Is there a design issue here?
I run cmake-gui and select the one I want from a list.
What is the problem, the length of the list ?
More the combinatorial
On Tuesday 07 January 2014, Stephen Kelly wrote:
David Cole wrote:
There's been a design issue since extra generators were introduced...
The question is: is it possible to resolve it with a better design and
still keep the existing functionality?
Hence this mail :), and my mail to
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:21 PM, David Cole dlrd...@aol.com wrote:
If all the tests pass for you locally, and you are pretty sure they will
all pass on other machines too, then you can do it whenever you think it's
ready
Thanks, I merged it as described here:
On 09.01.2014 19:34, Eran Ifrah wrote:
Can you give a link to monitor?
See #3 on http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Module_Maintainers
for e-Mail notifications.
Direct link to the CMake Dashboard:
http://open.cdash.org/index.php?project=CMake
Nils
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other
Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Nils Gladitz nilsglad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09.01.2014 19:34, Eran Ifrah wrote:
Can you give a link to monitor?
See #3 on http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Module_Maintainers
for e-Mail notifications.
Direct link to the CMake Dashboard:
On 01/09/2014 01:43 PM, Eran Ifrah wrote:
Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Nils Gladitz nilsglad...@gmail.com
mailto:nilsglad...@gmail.com wrote:
Direct link to the CMake Dashboard:
http://open.cdash.org/index.php?project=CMake
FYI, there are a few problems with the topic on the
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14691
==
Reported By:tron_thomas
Assigned To:
This looks like a reasonable patch to me (just by eye, have not tried
it personally). *Although* it would be even better if there were an
additional case added in the ExternalProject test that handles passing
in (1) an empty git submodule list, and (2) a valid list. Although,
unless you add
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 01/09/2014 01:43 PM, Eran Ifrah wrote:
Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Nils Gladitz nilsglad...@gmail.commailto:
nilsglad...@gmail.com wrote:
Direct link to the CMake Dashboard:
On Wednesday 08 January 2014, you wrote:
On 11/20/2013 07:22 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
The solution is still to re-implement the --help-custom-modules
myman.1 command-line behavior as a special case with warnings. Alex
and Steve will have to work out who takes responsibility for that.
On 01/09/2014 03:39 PM, Eran Ifrah wrote:
How do I revert a topic? I can't seem to find it on the wiki
There are a few approaches depending on the complexity
of the topic. It is a bit tricky, especially if there
are merges in the topic. Explaining all the possibilities
would take too much
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 01/09/2014 03:39 PM, Eran Ifrah wrote:
How do I revert a topic? I can't seem to find it on the wiki
There are a few approaches depending on the complexity
of the topic. It is a bit tricky, especially if there
are
On 01/09/2014 04:21 PM, Eran Ifrah wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Brad King wrote:
I reverted the topic from 'next' for you so that you can
merge the rebased topic. Since it is coming back in as a
brand new topic you can safely squash the fixup changes
back into the
Hi,
I have this patch:
diff --git a/Modules/Platform/QNX.cmake b/Modules/Platform/QNX.cmake
index 8d45360..58ec112 100644
--- a/Modules/Platform/QNX.cmake
+++ b/Modules/Platform/QNX.cmake
@@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
set(QNXNTO 1)
-# Revise
-# The QNX GCC does not seem to have -isystem so remove the
Brad King wrote:
If you want CMake 3.0 to do anything better than this then
please work on the minimal re-implementation ASAP. Much of
the logic can be extracted from old versions and refactored
into an isolated compatibility implementation.
I think this suffices for now. I'm not aware of
Thanks Brad.
I had created my second attempt this morning and merged it with 'next' -
topic name support-codelite-ide-generator
I will keep an eye on the contentious build to make sure nothing is broken
Eran
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14692
==
Reported By:Micha Hergarden
Assigned To:
20 matches
Mail list logo
